Literature DB >> 30514627

Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks.

Axel S Koopman1, Idsart Kingma2, Gert S Faber1, Michiel P de Looze3, Jaap H van Dieën1.   

Abstract

With mechanical loading as the main risk factor for LBP in mind, exoskeletons are designed to reduce the load on the back by taking over a part of the required moment. The present study assessed the effect of a passive exoskeleton on back and abdominal muscle activation, hip and lumbar flexion and on the contribution of both the human and the exoskeleton to the L5/S1 net moment, during static bending at five different hand heights. Two configurations of the exoskeleton (LOW & HIGH) differing in angle-torque characteristics were tested. L5/S1 moments generated by the subjects were significantly reduced (15-20% for the most effective type) at all hand heights. LOW generated 4-11 Nm more support than HIGH at 50%, 25% and 0% upright stance hand height and HIGH generated 4-5 Nm more support than LOW at 100% and 75%. Significant reductions (11-57%) in back muscle activity were found compared to WITHOUT for both exoskeletons for some conditions. However, EMG reductions compared to WITHOUT were highly variable across subjects and not always significant. The device allowed for substantial lumbar bending (up to 70°) so that a number of participants showed the flexion-relaxation phenomenon, which prevented further reduction of back EMG by the device and even an increase from 2% to 6% MVC in abdominal activity at 25% hand height. These results indicate that flexion relaxation and its interindividual variation should be considered in future exoskeleton developments.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-back pain; Mechanical loading; Passive exoskeletons; Static holding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514627     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  Using passive or active back-support exoskeletons during a repetitive lifting task: influence on cardiorespiratory parameters.

Authors:  M Schwartz; K Desbrosses; J Theurel; G Mornieux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Anna L Ármannsdóttir; Philipp Beckerle; Juan C Moreno; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Maria-Teresa Manrique-Sancho; Antonio J Del-Ama; Jan F Veneman; Kristín Briem
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Jan Babič; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Review of Current Spinal Robotic Orthoses.

Authors:  Siu Kei David Mak; Dino Accoto
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-13

Review 6.  Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Mattia Pesenti; Alberto Antonietti; Marta Gandolla; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Human Thermal Responses in Temperate and Cold Environments.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xiaoling Li; Jiarui Lai; Aibin Zhu; Xiaodong Zhang; Ziming Zheng; Huijin Zhu; Yueyang Shi; Long Wang; Zhangyi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Stiffening the human foot with a biomimetic exotendon.

Authors:  Ryan C Riddick; Dominic J Farris; Nicholas A T Brown; Luke A Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Passive Trunk Exoskeleton Acceptability and Effects on Self-efficacy in Employees with Low-Back Pain: A Mixed Method Approach.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; H Houdijk; J H van Dieën; J Th C M de Kruif
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2021-03

10.  [Association, expectations and barriers of the use of exoskeletons in small and medium-sized enterprises].

Authors:  Holger Hoffmann; Imke Pitz; Björn Adomssent; Christoph Russmann
Journal:  Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Ergon       Date:  2022-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.