Literature DB >> 26444053

Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.

Michiel P de Looze1,2, Tim Bosch1, Frank Krause1, Konrad S Stadler3, Leonard W O'Sullivan4.   

Abstract

The aim of this review was to provide an overview of assistive exoskeletons that have specifically been developed for industrial purposes and to assess the potential effect of these exoskeletons on reduction of physical loading on the body. The search resulted in 40 papers describing 26 different industrial exoskeletons, of which 19 were active (actuated) and 7 were passive (non-actuated). For 13 exoskeletons, the effect on physical loading has been evaluated, mainly in terms of muscle activity. All passive exoskeletons retrieved were aimed to support the low back. Ten-forty per cent reductions in back muscle activity during dynamic lifting and static holding have been reported. Both lower body, trunk and upper body regions could benefit from active exoskeletons. Muscle activity reductions up to 80% have been reported as an effect of active exoskeletons. Exoskeletons have the potential to considerably reduce the underlying factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal injury. Practitioner Summary: Worldwide, a significant interest in industrial exoskeletons does exist, but a lack of specific safety standards and several technical issues hinder mainstay practical use of exoskeletons in industry. Specific issues include discomfort (for passive and active exoskeletons), weight of device, alignment with human anatomy and kinematics, and detection of human intention to enable smooth movement (for active exoskeletons).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exoskeleton; discomfort; industry; physical workload

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26444053     DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2015.1081988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  41 in total

1.  Controlling a Lower-Leg Exoskeleton Using Voltage and Current Variation Signals of a DC Motor Mounted at the Knee Joint.

Authors:  Muhammad Al-Ayyad; Bashar Al-Haj Moh'd; Nidal Qasem; Mohammad Al-Takrori
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A System for Simple Robotic Walking Assistance With Linear Impulses at the Center of Mass.

Authors:  Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi; Prokopios Antonellis; Philippe Malcolm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Critical review on applications and roles of exoskeletons in patient handling.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Ashley L Hawke; Kimeran Evans
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 4.  Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Brian Lowe; Ashley L Hawke; John Z Wu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021

5.  Using passive or active back-support exoskeletons during a repetitive lifting task: influence on cardiorespiratory parameters.

Authors:  M Schwartz; K Desbrosses; J Theurel; G Mornieux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.346

6.  A Pilot Study of Varying Thoracic and Abdominal Compression in a Reconfigurable Trunk Exoskeleton During Different Activities.

Authors:  Maja Gorsic; Yubi Regmi; Alwyn P Johnson; Boyi Dai; Domen Novak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.

Authors:  Xianlian Zhou; Liying Zheng
Journal:  IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors       Date:  2021-07-26

8.  Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Richard F Sesek; Lora A Cavuoto
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.598

9.  Evaluation of two upper-limb exoskeletons during overhead work: influence of exoskeleton design and load on muscular adaptations and balance regulation.

Authors:  K Desbrosses; M Schwartz; J Theurel
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Soft pneumatic elbow exoskeleton reduces the muscle activity, metabolic cost and fatigue during holding and carrying of loads.

Authors:  John Nassour; Martin Grimmer; Guoping Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.