Literature DB >> 26851481

The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.

Tim Bosch1, Jennifer van Eck2, Karlijn Knitel2, Michiel de Looze3.   

Abstract

Exoskeletons may form a new strategy to reduce the risk of developing low back pain in stressful jobs. In the present study we examined the potential of a so-called passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in prolonged forward-bended working postures. Eighteen subjects performed two tasks: a simulated assembly task with the trunk in a forward-bended position and static holding of the same trunk position without further activity. We measured the electromyography for muscles in the back, abdomen and legs. We also measured the perceived local discomfort. In the static holding task we determined the endurance, defined as the time that people could continue without passing a specified discomfort threshold. In the assembly task we found lower muscle activity (by 35-38%) and lower discomfort in the low back when wearing the exoskeleton. Additionally, the hip extensor activity was reduced. The exoskeleton led to more discomfort in the chest region. In the task of static holding, we observed that exoskeleton use led to an increase in endurance time from 3.2 to 9.7 min, on average. The results illustrate the good potential of this passive exoskeleton to reduce the internal muscle forces and (reactive) spinal forces in the lumbar region. However, the adoption of an over-extended knee position might be, among others, one of the concerns when using the exoskeleton.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discomfort; Electromyography; Endurance; Exoskeleton; Industry; Trunk bending

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851481     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  33 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends.

Authors:  Pranav Madhav Kuber; Masoud Abdollahi; Mohammad Mehdi Alemi; Ehsan Rashedi
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Critical review on applications and roles of exoskeletons in patient handling.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Ashley L Hawke; Kimeran Evans
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 3.  Evaluation and Test Methods of Industrial Exoskeletons In Vitro, In Vivo, and In Silico: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Liying Zheng; Brian Lowe; Ashley L Hawke; John Z Wu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2021

4.  Barriers to the Adoption of Wearable Sensors in the Workplace: A Survey of Occupational Safety and Health Professionals.

Authors:  Mark C Schall; Richard F Sesek; Lora A Cavuoto
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.598

5.  Assessing the Involvement of Users During Development of Lower Limb Wearable Robotic Exoskeletons: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Anna L Ármannsdóttir; Philipp Beckerle; Juan C Moreno; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Maria-Teresa Manrique-Sancho; Antonio J Del-Ama; Jan F Veneman; Kristín Briem
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Wearable Monitoring Devices for Biomechanical Risk Assessment at Work: Current Status and Future Challenges-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ranavolo Alberto; Francesco Draicchio; Tiwana Varrecchia; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Development and Investigation of a Wearable Aid for a Load Carriage Task.

Authors:  Saad A Alabdulkarim; Abdulsalam M Farhan; Mohamed Z Ramadan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Soft pneumatic elbow exoskeleton reduces the muscle activity, metabolic cost and fatigue during holding and carrying of loads.

Authors:  John Nassour; Martin Grimmer; Guoping Zhao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Development and evaluation of a passive trunk support system for Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients.

Authors:  Mohammad Nauzef Mahmood; Laura H C Peeters; Micha Paalman; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Feasibility of a Biomechanically-Assistive Garment to Reduce Low Back Loading During Leaning and Lifting.

Authors:  Erik P Lamers; Aaron J Yang; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.