Literature DB >> 31718821

Effects of a passive back exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low-back during symmetric lifting.

Axel S Koopman1, Idsart Kingma2, Michiel P de Looze3, Jaap H van Dieën1.   

Abstract

Low-back pain is the number one cause of disability in the world, with mechanical loading as one of the major risk factors. Exoskeletons have been introduced in the workplace to reduce low back loading. During static forward bending, exoskeletons have been shown to reduce back muscle activity by 10% to 40%. However, effects during dynamic lifting are not well documented. Relative support of the exoskeleton might be smaller in lifting compared to static bending due to higher peak loads. In addition, exoskeletons might also result in changes in lifting behavior, which in turn could affect low back loading. The present study investigated the effect of a passive exoskeleton on peak compression forces, moments, muscle activity and kinematics during symmetric lifting. Two types (LOW and HIGH) of the device, which generate peak support moments at large and moderate flexion angles, respectively, were tested during lifts from knee and ankle height from a near and far horizontal position, with a load of 10 kg. Both types of the trunk exoskeleton tested here reduced the peak L5S1 compression force by around 5-10% for lifts from the FAR position from both KNEE and ANKLE height. Subjects did adjust their lifting style when wearing the device with a 17% reduced peak trunk angular velocity and 5 degrees increased lumbar flexion, especially during ANKLE height lifts. In conclusion, the exoskeleton had a minor and varying effect on the peak L5S1 compression force with only significant differences in the FAR lifts.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compression forces; Lifting; Low-back pain; Mechanical loading; Passive exoskeletons

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31718821     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.109486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Subjective Responses of Low Back Pain Patients and Asymptomatic Controls to Use of Spinal Exoskeleton during Simple Load Lifting Tasks: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Jan Babič; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.

Authors:  Mattia Pesenti; Alberto Antonietti; Marta Gandolla; Alessandra Pedrocchi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.

Authors:  Christian Di Natali; Giorgia Chini; Stefano Toxiri; Luigi Monica; Sara Anastasi; Francesco Draicchio; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Effects of a Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton on Knee Joint Loading during Simulated Static Sorting and Dynamic Lifting Tasks.

Authors:  Mona Bär; Tessy Luger; Robert Seibt; Julia Gabriel; Monika A Rieger; Benjamin Steinhilber
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.