| Literature DB >> 33238416 |
Steve O'Hagan1,2, Douglas B Kell3,4.
Abstract
It is known that at least some fluorophores can act as 'surrogate' substrates for solute carriers (SLCs) involved in pharmaceutical drug uptake, and this promiscuity is taken to reflect at least a certain structural similarity. As part of a comprehensive study seeking the 'natural' subst<span class="Species">rates of 'orphan' transporters that also serve to take up pharmaceutical drugs into cells, we have noted that many drugs bear structural similarities to natural products. A cursory inspection of common fluorophores indicates that they too are surprisingly 'drug-like', and they also enter at least some cells. Some are also known to be substrates of efflux transporters. Consequently, we sought to assess the structural similarity of common fluorophores to marketed drugs, endogenous mammalian metabolites, and natural products. We used a set of some 150 fluorophores along with standard fingerprinting methods and the Tanimoto similarity metric.Entities:
Keywords: Tanimoto distance; cheminformatics; drugs; fingerprinting; fluorophores; natural products; rdkit; similarity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33238416 PMCID: PMC7700180 DOI: 10.3390/md18110582
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Principal components and t-SNE plots of the principal components of the variance in calculated properties of the molecules used. (A) The first two principal components of the variance in calculated properties of the four classes fluorophores, drugs, metabolites and natural products. Molecules are as in Supplementary Fluorophores SI.xlsx, with the drugs and metabolites those given in [45]. A sampling of 2000 natural products from our download [55] of UNPD was used. Descriptors were z-scores normalised and correlation filtered (threshold 0.98). (B) t-SNE plot of the data in (A), using the same colour-coding. (C). Plot of the first two principal components of the variance in the fluorophores alone. The excitation wavelength is encoded in the colour of the markers. The size of the symbol encodes the molecular weight, indicating that much of the first PC is due to this (plus any other covarying properties).
Figure 2Ranked order of Tanimoto similarity for fluorophores vs. marketed drugs (green line/), fluorophores vs. Recon2 metabolites (red line/), and fluorophores vs. a 2000-member sampling of UNPD (blue line/). Each fluorophore was encoded using the RDKit ‘Patterned’ encoding, then the Tanimoto similarity for it was calculated against each drug, metabolite or natural product sample. The highest value of TS for each fluorophore was recorded and those values ranked. Read from right to left.
Figure 3Heat maps illustrating the Tanimoto similarities (using the RDKit patterned encoding) between our selected fluorophores and (A) Recon2 metabolites, (B) Drugs, and (C) a subset of 2000 natural products from UNPD.
Figure 4Observable structural similarities between selected fluorophores and drugs. The chosen molecules are (A) fluorescein, (B) dapoxyl (both fluorophores) and (C) nitisinone (a drug). Data are annotated and/or zoomed from those in Figure 1B.
Figure 5Distribution of quantitative estimate of drug-likeness (QED) values in different classes of molecule. (A). Cumulative distributions for the four classes. (B). Relationship between QED and aromaticity for the four classes as encoded by the fraction of C atoms exhibiting sp3 bonding. QED values were calculated using the RDKit Python code as described in Methods and plotted in (A) using ggplot2 and in (B) using Spotfire. (C). Density distribution of fraction of C atoms with sp3 bonding. (D). Histogram of distributions of numbers of aromatic rings in the four given classes.
Some examples in which fluorescent dyes have been found to interact with uptake transporters directly as substrates or inhibitors. We do not include known non-fluorescent substrates to which a fluorescent tag has been added (see, e.g., [131,132,133]).
| Dye | Transporter | Comments | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amiloride | OCT2 (SLC22A2) | A drug. Rhodamine 123 and 6G also served as substrates. | [ |
| 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindol (DAPI) | OCT1 (SLC22A1) | Potently inhibited by desipramine and also by various organophosphate pesticides. | [ |
| DiBAC(4)3 | Na+/HCO3− NBCe1-A SLC4A4 | Competes with 4,4′-Diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid | [ |
| 5-carboxyfluorescein | OAT3 (SLC22A8 | Very high Vmax | [ |
| 6-carboxyfluorescein | OAT1 (SLC22A6) | [ | |
| 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein | OATP1B1 (SLCO1B1) | Good substrate | [ |
| 4-(4-(Dimethylamino) styryl)-N-methylpyridinium (ASP+) | Dopamine transporter (SLC6A3) | [ | |
| Noradrenaline transporter (SLC6A2) | [ | ||
| Serotonin transporter SLC6A4 | [ | ||
| Various monoamine transporters | [ | ||
| OCT1/OCT2 (SLC22A1/2); | Seen as a model substrate | [ | |
| Various OCT transporters | [ | ||
| Other, unknown (non-OCT1/2) transporters with low affinity | [ | ||
| Ethidium | OCT1/2/3 (SLC22A1/2/3) | Substrate | [ |
| FFN511 | VMAT2 (SLC18A2) | ‘False fluorescent neurotransmitter’ (i.e., surrogate substrates) concept | [ |
| FFN54/246 | SLC6A4, SLC18 | ‘False’ fluorescent substrates for serotonin and VMAT transporters. Potent inhibition by imipramine and citalopram | [ |
| FFN270 | SLC6A4, SLC18 | Another example of a fluorescent false neurotransmitter | [ |
| Fluorescein | SLCO1B1/3B1 | Effective substrate; analysis of inhibitors | [ |
| OAT6 (SLC22A20) | [ | ||
| SLC16A1, SLC16A4 | [ | ||
| Many OATPs (SLCO family) expressed in insect cells | [ | ||
| Lucifer yellow | Sodium-dependent anion transporters | Inhibited by probenecid | [ |
| Rhodamine 123 | OCT1/OCT2 (SLC22A1/2) | Potent substrate | [ |
| Stilbazolium dyes | Norepinephrine transporter (SLC6) | Dyes related to ASP+ | [ |
| Zombie Violet, Live/Dead Green, Cascade Blue, Alexa Fluor 405 | OATP (SLCO) 1B1/1B3 and 2B1 | All shown to be direct substrates, and uptake inhibited by known transporter inhibitors | [ |
Figure 6UMAP projection into two dimensions of the four classes of molecules, annotated by the type of molecular structure in the various clusters.