The Melanocortin System behind the Dysfunctional Eating Behaviors.

The dysfunction of melanocortin signaling has been associated with obesity, given the important role in the regulation of energy homeostasis, food intake, satiety and body weight. In the hypothalamus, the melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) and melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) contribute to the stability of these processes, but MC3R and MC4R are also localized in the mesolimbic dopamine system, the region that responds to the reinforcing properties of highly palatable food (HPF) and where these two receptors seem to affect food reward and motivation. Loss of function of the MC4R, resulting from genetic mutations, leads to overeating in humans, but to date, a clear understanding of the underlying mechanisms and behaviors that promote overconsumption of caloric foods remains unknown. Moreover, the MC4R demonstrated to be a crucial modulator of the stress response, factor that is known to be strictly related to binge eating behavior. In this review, we will explore the preclinical and clinical studies, and the controversies regarding the involvement of melanocortin system in altered eating patterns, especially binge eating behavior, food reward and motivation.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the increased consumption of food highly rich in fat, sugar and palatable components has fueled the so called Western diet, leading to excessive and non-homeostatic feeding behavior that impacts the quality of life [1,2]. The melanocortin system, known to be a key pathway in the regulation of food intake, body weight and energy balance [3,4,5,6], has been proposed as a possible underlying factor not only in obesity, in which there is evidence of a consistent relationship [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], but also in several dysfunctional eating patterns [15,16,17,18,19,20] that can lead to obesity, modulating the motivation for hedonic properties of food [21,22,23]. Among the altered feeding patterns, binge eating behavior is one of the most studied, due to the overlaps that exist with obesity [24,25,26], and melanocortin signaling can influence reward-related behaviors, given the presence of melanocortin receptors (MCRs) not only in the hypothalamus, but also in reward-related brain areas such as in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway [27,28].

Binge eating is a typical feature in eating disorders, in particular Bulimia Nervosa, binge/purging subtype of Anorexia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorder (BED). A binge eating episode is characterized by an unusual consumption of a large amount of food that most people would not eat in the same discrete period of time, connected with the inability to stop overeating, accompanied by feelings of guilt, shame and regret [29]. Differently from Bulimia Nervosa and Anorexia Nervosa, BED is characterized by recurrent episodes of binge eating not followed by inappropriate compensatory behaviors, such as vomiting, prolonged fasting, or excessive exercise for controlling weight gain [29]. BED is the most prevalent eating disorder in adolescents and young women [24,25,30], and it is associated in some instances with overweight or obesity [31,32]. The subgroup of obese individuals that suffers also from BED seems to increase food-related impulsivity and reward sensitivity in comparison to obese people without BED [33,34]. Additionally, food craving is significantly higher under negative emotional states (including disappointment, anger, guilt, depressive symptoms) [35,36] and stress exposure [37,38,39] in obese binge eaters rather than obese. Thus, binge eating is a risk factor for obesity and, at the same time, overweight and obesity might enhance the possibility to engage binge eating behavior [40]. In light of these interconnected aberrant feeding patterns and the involvement of the MCRs in overeating and stress, the aim of this review is to revise the current literature on PubMed, regarding the role of the melanocortin system as a mutual underlying factor that may increase the susceptibility to develop aberrant eating behaviors. After a brief summary of the localization and the physiological functions of the melanocortin system, we will describe the role of melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) and melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) on food intake, focusing on their interaction with the brain reward system. Subsequently, we will highlight the impact of genetic mutations of MC4R on food consumption in humans. Finally, the melanocortin system, principally via MC4R, will be explored in stress response, considering stress as a key factor triggering altered feeding patterns.

2. An Overview of the Melanocortin Receptors in the Control of Food Intake

Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) is the precursor molecule of α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH), one of its proteolytic cleavage products, which has a regulatory role in feeding related behavior and satiety; the other active peptides are β-MSH, γ-MSH, adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and β-endorphin [3,4,9]. Localization of POMC neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) is in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus (ARC) and in the nucleus of the tractus solitarius (NTS) of the brainstem, areas implicated in body weight loss, energy homeostasis and signaling of satiety, showing anorexigenic effects [4]. Adjacent to POMC cells, in the hypothalamic ARC, are localized agouti-related protein (AgRP) neurons and the neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons producing, respectively, the endogenous antagonist of MCRs AgRP and the orexigenic neuropeptide NPY, both able to increase food intake [3,41,42]. In the 1990s, the first MCRs were initially cloned, and, subsequently, all five MCRs, members of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, have been identified [43,44,45,46]. MC3R and MC4R are widely expressed in CNS, and, binding the endogenous MCRs agonist, α-MSH, are able to activate adenylate cyclase to elevate intracellular cAMP levels, generating an anorexigenic signal [41,47], regulating the homeostasis of energy intake and feeding behavior and suppressing food consumption [4,6,16]. Conversely, MC1R, MC2R and MC5R are primarily found in the periphery: the MC1R especially in the melanocytes, the MC2R in the adrenal cortex and MC5R in the exocrine glands [4,48].

The MC3R is predominantly expressed in the brain within the hypothalamus, mainly in the ARC and less in the dorsomedial portion of the ventromedial nucleus, anteroventral preoptic area, posterior hypothalamic area, the medial preoptic area and paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus, but there is evidence of MC3R moderately localized also in the limbic system, in ventral tegmental area (VTA), central linear nucleus of raphe, in the lateral nucleus of the septum and in the medial habenula nucleus of the thalamus [43,46,48,49].

In contrast with MC3R, the MC4R has a more widespread expression in the CNS; indeed, the MC4R shows high prevalence in hypothalamic sites including PVN, the medial preoptic area, anterior hypothalamic nucleus, ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, dorsomedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, tuberomammillary nucleus and other several hypothalamic areas, but it is also strongly expressed in the brainstem and moderately in the cortex, hippocampus, corpus striatum, amygdala, thalamus, spinal cord and also detected in the peripheral nervous system [27,43,48,50,51].

In the brain, the distinct localization, more widely for MC4R than for MC3R, also reflects a different binding with the peptides deriving from POMC cleavage: α-MSH and γ-MSH have high affinity for MC3R; meanwhile, MC4R is preferentially bound by α-MSH and less by γ-MSH [44,46,50,51]. Moreover, AgRP, endogenous antagonist of MCRs, has high affinity for both these receptors [41,42], reflecting a differential regulation of the metabolic response and food consumption [7,42,52]. Furthermore, in the hypothalamus, the melanocortin pathway interacts with other crucial hormones, such as leptin and insulin, which promote the processing of POMC to the anorexigenic α-MSH, signaling a decreased energy intake and contributing to the fed state (for details see ref. [12,53,54,55]). In addition, another functional interaction of the melanocortin system in the ARC nucleus is with the orexigenic neuropeptide Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ [56,57], which exerts an inhibitory influence on α-MSH cells [58], and is strictly involved in stress mechanisms [59,60] and binge eating behavior [56,61,62,63,64].

Preliminary information about the functions and physiological role related to feeding of MC3R and MC4R was provided by studies with the deletion of these MCRs in mice, which developed obesity, increased adipose mass, hyperphagia and lack of appetite control, in particular more pronounced in MC4R knockout (KO) mice rather than MC3R KO mice, even though mice lacking both receptors become significantly heavier than MC4R KO [11,16,65,66,67,68]. Additionally, all the previous effects, characteristic of severe obesity, are predominantly linked to MC4R mutations and defects in MC4R signaling in humans, compared to the alterations of MC3R, which frequently cause only moderate obesity or limited hyperphagia; to date, the role of MC3R remains an element that needs to be clarified [11,13,14,69,70,71,72]. Taking into account all these findings, it is interesting to explore the studies conducted so far regarding the association of MCRs with compulsive eating, food reward and motivation, and to support the possibility of their implication in binge eating behavior.

3. Melanocortin Receptors in Feeding

3.1. MC3R

3.1.1. MC3R: Preclinical Studies on Eating Behavior

The MC3R, compared to the MC4R subtype, exhibits a more limited distribution in the brain, being predominantly found in the hypothalamic nuclei and limbic regions, with dense expression in the ARC, ventromedial hypothalamus, VTA and medial habenula, structures in which it is supposed to regulate energy homeostasis and food seeking behavior [46,50,73,74,75]. MC3R and MC4R KO mice have been used to investigate the role of each receptor in regulating energy homeostasis, and many studies revealed that MC3Rs and MC4Rs might function independently, playing a complementary but non-redundant role in the regulation of energy balance [65,66,68,76]. Targeted deletion of the MC3R gene in mice promotes a modest obesity syndrome and increased accumulation of fat mass that is not related to hyperphagia, with a normal anorectic response to melanocortin agonists [65,66], suggesting that this receptor could be mostly involved in the regulation of energy homeostasis and metabolic processes, rather than in the control of feeding behavior. However, a study by Zhang et al. showed that MC3Rs and MC4Rs are of approximately equal importance in preventing weight gain during a high-fat chow diet, and that the absence of MC3Rs compromises leptin’s ability to decrease food consumption [76], evidencing an altered anorectic response in MC3R null mice. Moreover, male MC3R KO mice, backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J background, showed a mild hyperphagia after exposure to a purified high-fat diet [6]. Sutton et al. demonstrated that obesity associated with MC3R deficiency is dependent on the dietary fat, considering that, if exposed to a low-fat diet, MC3R KO mice exhibited a modest increase in adiposity and a normal body weight, while during a high-fat diet, fat mass was comparable to that of MC4R KO littermates [68]. Additionally, MC3R KO mice were not hyperphagic under a low-fat diet, but showed a modest increase in food consumption under the high-fat diet, an effect that was gender specific, being mainly observed in male mice [68]. A recent experiment in mice with “humanized” MC3Rs further evidenced the role of the MC3R in appetite control: in this mouse model, the murine MC3R was replaced with the Wild Type (WT) human MC3R (MC3RhWT/hWT) or the double-mutant C17A (Thr6Lys) + G241A (Val81Ile) human MC3R (MC3RhDM/hDM) [77], characterized by a reduced receptor binding, signaling transduction and less protein expression, and associated with a greater risk of childhood obesity in human homozygous carriers [78,79,80]. Mutant homozygous mice with the double mutation (MC3RhDM/hDM) had an increased adiposity and energy intake, compared to WT human MC3R (MC3RhWT/hWT) littermates and were also hyperphagic [77], highlighting the contribution of MC3R signaling to energy homeostasis, metabolism and feeding behavior.

The behavioral phenotype linked to MC3R-deficiency may be also contextual and dependent on energy balance. In fact, MC3R-deficient mice appear to be less sensitive to the “pain” of hunger, and are not motivated to avoid unpleasant experiences associated with nutrient scarcity [81], as described by investigations using hypocaloric restricting feeding protocols. In this context, MC3Rs seem to be essential for entrainment of anticipatory behavior toward feeding time [81,82]. Food anticipatory behavior, consisting of a progressive rise of activity preceding food presentation, assessed using running wheels and measuring home cage activity, is attenuated in MC3R KO mice, compared to WT, under a restricting feeding protocol [73,82,83]. Moreover, the same mice did not exhibit the increased wakefulness generally coincident with food presentation and normally observed in non-mutant rodents [82]. Hypocaloric feeding protocols are known to promote binge-like eating behavior in WT mice, which reduce meal frequency but increase meal size and duration, with most of the food consumed within the first hour of presentation [21,83,84]. This behavioral phenotype is markedly attenuated in MC3R KO mice, without compensation in the feeding cycle later or changes in the meal structure, a finding that supports the essential role of an intact MC3R signaling in the compulsive eating response, observed after exposure to situations of poor nutrient availability and prolonged negative energy balance [83,84]. Additionally, the motivation to self-administer a food reward is markedly attenuated in MC3R-deficient mice, exposed to a caloric restriction protocol, while being normal if mice are fed in ad libitum conditions, reducing self-administration of chocolate flavored pellets [21]. The abnormal behavioral features associated with the deletion of MC3Rs could be partially explained by the neuroendocrine alterations found in the brain of MC3R-deficient mice, which failed to present the increase in the potent orexigenic neuropeptides AgRP and NPY during fasting and hypocaloric conditions [5,84,85]. Intriguingly, MC3R-deficient mice also exhibit altered responses of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis during caloric restriction, showing a lack of corticosterone serum increase in response to fasting, which instead is found in WT mice [84,85]. Furthermore, the dysregulation of fasting-induced corticosterone release was accompanied by a defect in the upregulation of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) mRNA in the MC3R KO mice [85], indicating that both hypothalamic and adrenal functions are compromised by the absence of this receptor. Considering both the dysfunctional eating behaviors and the altered activity of the HPA axis observed in MC3R KO mice during fasting, future studies should be conducted to investigate if deletion or antagonism of the MC3R could reduce the compulsive-like eating in a preclinical model of binge eating, where a binge eating episode is elicited by the combination of food restriction and stress, trying to further characterize the role of this receptor in both homeostatic and non-homeostatic eating [86,87].

The information obtained from studies with MC3R KO mice are in accordance with the putative role of the MC3R as an inhibitory autoreceptor on POMC neurons [49,88,89], where α- and γ-MSH, released by POMC nerve terminals within the ARC, are supposed to regulate the activity of POMC neurons through activation of MC3R subtypes, and studies with selective MC3R agonists confirmed this observation. Indeed, Marks et al. found that stimulation of the MC3R, by peripheral administration of the selective MC3R agonist [D-trp8]-γ-MSH, results in the inhibition of POMC neuronal activity, which in turn leads to an increase in food intake in WT mice, while having no effect on feeding in MC3R KO littermates [90]. The suppression of POMC neuronal activity, after injection of [D-trp8]-γ-MSH, was demonstrated to be a consequence of an increased inhibitory synaptic transmission, due to the activation of GABAergic NPY neurons in the ARC, releasing GABA on POMC neurons [88,89]. Considering the highly potent orexigenic activity of NPY [91], this can explain the observed increase in food intake after stimulation of the MC3R [90], as reported in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The potential MC3R mechanisms leading to increase food intake and motivation for highly palatable food (HPF) in preclinical studies. ↓: decrease; ↑: increase; ARC: Arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus; HPF: Highly palatable food; MC3R: Melanocortin-3 receptor; NPY: neuropeptide Y; POMC: Pro-opiomelanocortin; VTA: Ventral Tegmental Area.

However, the study by Marks et al. had the limitation of investigating the effect of the MC3R agonist only by a peripheral administration, not clearly explaining if the results obtained were due to a peripheral or central action. Subsequently, Lee et al., using a rat model, obtained a similar finding, analyzing the effect of the same compound directly injected in the CNS, through intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections, resulting in an increased food intake in treated rats, confirming a central mechanism of action [92]. Interestingly, it was examined if antagonism at MC3R would have the opposite effect, inhibiting feeding, but a strange result was obtained, observing that the MC3R antagonist PG-932, at a low dose, suppressed food intake, while at a higher dose significantly increased food consumption and body weight. These effects could be explained with the possible antagonism profile of PG-932 even at MC4R, when injected at high doses in rats [92].

Taken together, these studies confirm that the MC3Rs, despite their functions are still not completely understood, could represent important targets for the treatment of obesity and could also play a role in the aberrant feeding patterns that characterize eating disorders.

3.1.2. MC3R: Preclinical Studies in Food Reward

The melanocortin system interacts with several nuclei of the brain and neural circuits, among which, one of the most relevant in the control of food intake and body weight is the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system [93], connecting the VTA with the Nac, amygdala and PFC, regions particularly involved in reward, motivational processes and food consumption [94,95,96]. Dopamine has an essential role in food intake and reward, and thus, it is supposed that the melanocortin system can also influence feeding by modulating dopamine transmission in areas that are implicated in eating behaviors, satiety perception and reward processes. Indeed, α-MSH may affect food intake and reward, principally regulating dopamine neuronal activity in the VTA, which is part of the mesolimbic system that includes dopamine cells of the VTA projecting to the NAc [97], a key region for the reinforcing properties of highly palatable food (HPF). HPF, which consists of aliments rich in fat, sugar or both, is a potent reward and has been demonstrated to induce dopamine transmission in the NAc in both human and animal studies, increasing motivation to overconsume this type of food [94,95]. It is well documented that intra-VTA injections of α-MSH stimulate dopamine release in the NAc and dopamine-related behaviors, confirming that α-MSH increases dopamine neuronal activity in the VTA [98,99,100,101], and that POMC and AgRP neurons send projections to the VTA [102,103]. In this brain region, there is expression of both MC3Rs and MC4Rs in dopamine and non-dopamine neurons, but MC3Rs are expressed at a much higher level, compared to MC4Rs [22,46,74,104]. Conversely, the NAc shell shows a prominent concentration of MC4Rs that are found on both D1 and D2 receptor-expressing neurons [23], suggesting a differential action of MCRs on dopamine signaling in these brain areas. In light of the high expression of the MC3Rs in the VTA, the role of these receptors in the hedonic aspect of food intake was evaluated via activation of the reward circuitry. Accordingly, MC3R KO female mice, in a sucrose preference test, showed a significant reduction in the sucrose solution intake at all concentrations used (ranged from 1 to 2%), relative to WT littermates, and this was also accompanied by a decrease in sucrose preference at concentration of 1% [74]. Given the critical role of an intact VTA for sucrose preference and intake [105,106], and considering the high concentration of the MC3Rs in this region, it was hypothesized that the defect in sucrose intake in MC3R KO female mice was due to MC3R-related alterations in dopaminergic signaling in the VTA. Deletion of MC3Rs in mice was accompanied by changes in dopamine levels and its metabolites, DOPAC and homovanillic acid, in the VTA, but, interestingly, these parameters were restored in ovariectomized mice, suggesting an interaction between the melanocortin system and estrogens in the regulation of midbrain dopamine levels [74], a factor that could have an impact on food intake, taking into account the important relationship between ovarian hormones and emotional eating and binge eating, in both rodents and humans [107,108,109,110].

A following study, using MC3Rtm1Butl (MC3RTB/TB) mice, the strain in which the expression of MC3R is suppressed by insertion of a loxP-flanked transcription blocker (TB) into the genes 5′ UTR [8], reported that the absence of MC3R signaling reduced self-administration of food reward (20 mg chocolate flavored food pellet) under a progressive ratio protocol in mice subjected to caloric restriction. The result of this study suggests that the motivation to obtain a food reward in MC3RTB/TB mice might be related to conditions of negative energy balance and nutrient scarcity, considering that this behavioral phenotype was not observed in mice with the same genotype, but with ad libitum access to food [21]. Moreover, acute refeeding after fasting did not induce neuronal activity (assessed by c-fos immunoreactivity) in the NAc of MC3RTB/TB mice, the region associated with reward and motivation for food [21], indicating the critical role performed by the MC3R in the appetitive responses to weight loss. Rescuing the expression of the endogenous MC3Rs in the VTA partially re-established the reduced motivation to work for food reward that characterized MC3RTB/TB mice, suggesting that MC3Rs expressed in the VTA could influence motivational responses to caloric restriction and have an important function in the defense of body weight during situations of poor nutrient availability [21].

Pandit et al. observed that pharmacological stimulation of the MC3Rs in the VTA increases the motivation to consume HPF, through a mechanism that involves dopaminergic transmission. Indeed, intra-VTA injection of the selective MC3R agonist γ-MSH increased response to sucrose in rats, evaluated under a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, an effect demonstrated by the increased number of active lever presses for sucrose. Conversely, when rats had free access to the sucrose pellet, the same treatment did not enhance free intake of both sucrose pellet or chow, indicating that MC3R stimulation selectively increases the incentive motivation for HPF and not its actual intake [22]. In the same study, i.c.v. administration of α-MSH, a MC3R/MC4R agonist, as expected, decreased the number of active lever presses, reducing response to sucrose, but when α-MSH was co-administrated with the MC4R antagonist HS014, motivation for sucrose was enhanced, supporting the role of MC3Rs in the motivation to obtain a food reward [22]. Interestingly, pretreatment with the dopamine receptors antagonist α-flupenthixol blocked the γ-MSH increased response to sucrose, and this confirms that MC3Rs in the VTA could affect food reward in a dopamine-dependent manner [22].

The result of this study is particularly interesting because it suggests that the melancortin system could fine tune motivation for HPF, depending on the type of MCR expression in different brain nuclei, considering that MC3R signaling in the VTA promotes the motivation-enhancing effects of food rewards (see Figure 1), while MC4R signaling in the NAc shell has the opposite effect, decreasing motivation for HPF [23].

3.2. MC4R

3.2.1. MC4R: Preclinical Studies on Food Preference and Motivation

As previously mentioned, the role of the MC4R in energy homeostasis and obesity is well established, and many preclinical and clinical studies investigated the implication of this receptor in preventing weight gain and regulating energy balance. However, it has been observed that MC4R could affect feeding behaviors also modulating the brain reward circuitry, in particular by influencing neural transmission in areas sensitive to reinforcing properties of HPF [28,111,112,113].

Indeed, central administration of the endogenous MCRs antagonist AgRP in rats has been demonstrated to preferentially increase intake of a high-fat diet, over a low-fat diet, with a mechanism involving opioid transmission, considering that Naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, was found to selectively counteract the consumption of high-fat pellets [112]. Additionally, a selective reduction in fat consumption was found in MC4R +/+ mice treated with intraperitoneally injection of melanotan II (MTII), a MC3R and MC4R agonist, without affecting the intake in MC4R −/− littermates and, in the same study, administration of the selective MC4R agonist (pentacyclo(d-K)-Asp-cis Apc-(d)Phe-Arg-Trp-Lys-NH2) had the same effect, suggesting that the MC4R is the necessary mediator for the reduction in fat intake [114]. When administered into the Central Amygdala, a region connected with hypothalamic areas that affect eating behavior, MTII strongly reduced the high-fat diet intake, but only moderately the low-fat or standard diet, conversely to injections of SHU-9119 and AgRP, antagonists of the MCRs, in the same brain area, that increased rat preference for the high-fat diet [115].

These findings were confirmed by the study of Tracy et al., in which rats, under operant and Pavlovian conditioning paradigms, after receiving i.c.v. injections of 1 nmol AgRP, enhanced active response to earn a peanut oil emulsion (100% fat) reinforcer, but not to obtain a sucrose (100% carbohydrate) reinforcer and increased responses to cues predictive of fat delivery [113]. These results extended previous evidence that melanocortins, via MC4Rs, are probably selective for the intake of high-fat food. Accordingly, Davis et al. observed that treatment with AgRP was able to support conditioned place preference for a high-fat diet compared to standard chow, while blocking the acquisition of place preference for sucrose pellets [111], indicating a selective reinforcement effect of melanocortin antagonism directed toward fat-rich food.

The ability of AgRP to modulate food intake is supposed to be mediated, at least in part, by its influence on dopaminergic signaling in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine circuitry, and central administration of AgRP promotes activation of c-fos immunoreactivity within tyrosine-hydroxylase midbrain dopamine neurons, indicating that melanocortin antagonists are able to elicit neuronal activation in these brain areas [111]. Furthermore, AgRP-treated rats increased dopamine turnover in the medial PFC, one of the major target of dopaminergic projections from the VTA, and it is known that dopaminergic neurons in the medial PFC respond to the positive hedonic aspect of HPF [111,116,117,118]. Activation of dopamine activity in the medial PFC could also be related to the AgRP ability to promote activation of orexin-A neurons in the lateral hypothalamus [119], strictly involved in the integration of rewarding stimuli, and orexin neurons in this area send projections to the VTA [120], which in turn could stimulate dopamine activity in the medial PFC. Orexin-A neurons are thought to principally regulate arousal, but also feeding and reward-related behaviors [120], and antagonism at the orexin-1 receptor has been demonstrated to block the compulsive-like eating episode in female rats, in a preclinical model of binge eating [121]. In light of these observations, the melanocortin system could be able to promote consumption of high-fat foods in a mechanism involving opioid, dopaminergic and orexin transmissions, and future investigation should be conducted to better understand how these neurotransmitter systems interact in order to facilitate the development of dysregulated eating behaviors.

Subsequent studies, testing MCRs agonists and antagonists, evaluated whether a direct injection of these compounds into the VTA was able to change feeding behavior, altering the activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Intra-VTA administration of MTII (a non-selective MC3R/MC4R agonist) dose-dependently suppressed the intake of standard chow in male rats, conversely to the MC3R/MC4R antagonist SHU-9119, which significantly stimulated 24-h food intake. Furthermore, a prolonged blockade of MCRs with the same MCRs antagonist, chronically injected for 5 days, increased total body weight, food intake and caloric efficiency, confirming that stimulation or blockade of MCRs might influence feeding behavior, by modulation of the mesolimbic dopamine transmission [122].

Taking into account this study, it was investigated if pharmacological stimulation of the MCRs in the VTA could also affect the intake of a rewarding sugar solution, under a two-bottle choice paradigm, a procedure in which rats had access to two identical drinking bottles, one containing normal water, and the other one filled with 1, 2 and 10% sucrose solutions. Intra-VTA administration of MTII dose-dependently decreased consumption of a 1 and 2% sucrose solutions, without affecting water intake in the 24-h prolonged access paradigm, while only the highest dose of MTII (50 pmol/side) reduced intake of the more appetizing 10% sucrose solution [123]. However, MTII treatment reduced not only sugar consumption in the two-bottle choice test, but also baseline 24-h food intake, raising the question of whether the effect of MCR stimulation in the mesolimbic pathway is specific or not to the hedonic aspect of food intake over the homeostatic level [123].

Additional studies have been performed to further investigate the role of the MC4Rs in the context of food reward, using self-administration paradigms, in order to evaluate if the melanocortin system could selectively affect food motivation. In light of the high expression of the MC4Rs in the NAc shell, α-MSH (0.2 nmol) and AgRP (0.1 nmol) were directly injected in this brain area, and they, respectively, decreased and increased food self-administration of 45 mg sucrose pellets, as indicated by the number of active lever presses and reinforcers earned in the operant conditioning chambers. This effect was demonstrated to be dopamine-dependent, considering that pretreatment with the dopamine receptors antagonist α-flupentixol, attenuated both active lever presses and reinforcers earned induced by AgRP [23]. Interestingly, α-MSH and AgRP, when administered in rats with free access to the sucrose pellets, did not influence feeding of the HPF, indicating that MC4Rs in the NAc shell are selectively involved in the motivation to obtain food reward [23]. A recent study, always using self-administration of sucrose pellets, under both a fixed and a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement, obtained a similar result, considering that stimulation of MCRs with intra-VTA injections of MTII dose-dependently reduced sucrose self-administration on both schedules, while blockade of melanocortin signaling in the same area, with the MCRs antagonist SHU-9119, increased self-administration, but only under fixed ratio protocol [124].

These studies had the limit of using compounds that are not selective for MC3R or MC4R and are not in accordance with a recent finding by Pandit et al., who reported that the selective MC3R agonist γ-MSH increased sucrose self-administration when injected in the VTA [23]. This discrepancy can be explained by the activation of distinct pathways, depending on the selectivity of the agonist that activates MC3R or MC4R [124], confirming the different roles played by these MCRs in the mesolimbic dopamine system to regulate food reward and motivation, as shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Summary of studies regarding MC3R and MC4R on food reward and motivation.

Species	Experiment	Result	Ref.
MC3R KO vs.WT mice	Sucrose preference test	↓ sucrose intake and preference in female MC3R KO mice	[74]
MC3Rtm1Butl (MC3RTB/TB) vs. WT mice	Food self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio protocols	↓ self-administration of a food reward in MC3RTB/TB mice exposed to caloric restriction	[21]
Rats	Food self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio protocols	↑ operant response, but not free access to sucrose after injection of the MC3R agonist γ-MSH	[22]
Rats	Consumption of a high-fat vs. low-fat diet	↑ intake of a high-fat diet vs. a low-fat diet after i.c.v. injection of AgRP	[112]
MC4R +/+ vs. MC4R −/− mice	Consumption of a three-choice diet (fat, protein, carbohydrate)	↓ fat intake in MC4R +/+, but not in MC4R −/− mice after injections of the MC3R/MC4R agonist MTII and the MC4R agonist (pentacyclo(D-K)-Asp-cis Apc-(D)Phe-Arg-Trp-Lys-NH2)	[114]
Rats	High-fat vs. low-fat diet paradigm	↓ the high-fat diet intake after injection of MTII in the CeA;↑ high-fat diet consumption after the injection MCRs antagonists SHU-9119 and AgRP	[115]
Rats	Fat and sugar consumption under an operant conditioning paradigm	↑ active response to earn a peanut oil emulsion (100% fat) reinforcer, but not a sucrose (100% carbohydrate) reinforcer after i.c.v. injection of AgRP	[113]
Rats	Conditioned place preference for high-fat diet and sucrose pellets	AgRP supports conditioned place preference for a high-fat diet, while blocks the acquisition of place preference for sucrose pellets	[111]
Rats	Consumption of standard chow	↓ intake of standard chow after intra-VTA injection of MTII;↑ 24-h food intake with SHU-9119	[122]
Rats	Two-bottle choice paradigm for a sucrose solution	↓ consumption of a 1 and 2% sucrose solutions with intra-VTA injections of MTII;↓ intake of the more appetizing 10% sucrose solution only at the highest dose of MTII	[39]
Rats	Food self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio protocols	↓ operant response with α-MSH and↑ operant response with AgRP injected in the NAc shell;no influence on free consumption of sucrose pellets	[23]
Rats	Food self-administration under fixed and progressive ratio protocols	↓ sucrose self-administration on both fixed and progressive ratio schedules with intra-VTA injections of MTII;↑ self-administration, only under fixed ratio protocols with SHU-9119	[124]

↓: decrease; ↑: increase; AgRP: Agouti-related protein; α-MSH: α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; γ-MSH: γ-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; CeA: Central Amygdala; i.c.v.: Intracerebroventricular; KO: Knock-out; MCRs: Melanocortin receptors; MC3R: Melanocortin-3 receptor; MC4R: Melanocortin-4 receptor; MTII: Melanotan II; NAc: Nucleus Accumbens; VTA: Ventral Tegmental Area; WT: Wild-Type.

Finally, from these observations, it was demonstrated that the melanocortin system is able to affect different aspects of feeding behavior (from standard chow intake to self-administration of HPF) in light of its ability to interact with many other brain pathways implicated in the control of appetite and eating. Moreover, the identification of how this system is altered in aberrant eating patterns, including binge eating behavior, would be useful for a better understanding of these disorders and the discovery of new potential treatments.

3.2.2. Clinical Studies on MC4R Mutations

Several human studies suggested that the dysfunction of the central melanocortin system, well established in the etiology of obesity, may be a potential mechanism underlying the development of altered eating patterns, due to its contribution to food seeking and consumption, appetite, hyperphagia and body weight control.

The majority of MC4R mutations [10], principally including missense and synonymous mutations, have demonstrated partial or complete no activity of MC4R through in vitro study [70], and this loss of function was associated with early-onset obesity in children, manifested particularly in homozygotes rather than heterozygotes, with a higher percentage of body fat mass, increased appetite and food seeking behavior during meals and hyperphagia [70]. Indeed, obese individuals, carriers of different MC4R mutations, compared with obese and normal weight participants without these variants, were diagnosed with BED through the completion of a validated questionnaire, thus resulting in the co-existence between obesity and BED [15,125]. In one of the first studies, despite a large number of obese children and adolescent carriers of MC4R gene mutations, only one girl met criteria for BED [126]. Conversely, Branson et al. found that obese individuals, carriers of MC4R gene mutations, met diagnostic criteria for BED, completing a validated eating disorder questionnaire [127] based on the fourth edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DMS-IV), defining BED as the major phenotype of MC4R genetic variants [15]. However, a significant controversy surrounded these findings [128], considering that other studies did not find an association between MC4R mutations and episodes of binge eating [129,130], and, in addition, no differences were detected in body mass index (BMI) or specific phenotype between adult carriers and non-carriers of the MC4R mutations [130]. In contrast to the study of Hebebrand et al., in which there were no strong associations between BED and MC4R mutations, Tao et al. identified BED in obese patients with specific mutations in this receptor (T11A, F51L, T112M and M200V), without being able to explain the possible pathogenesis of the development of this eating disorder in relation to MC4R mutations [131]. Additionally, variability of MC4R gene was also investigated in non-obese patients with binge eating behavior, showing a lower presence of MC4R mutation in this group in contrast to obese patients; however, the study was performed in a very small number of individuals with binge eating behavior and this limitation, together with the lack of a control group, might have affected the result [132].

The variants of MC4R were additionally considered for their possible association with the outcomes of bariatric surgery: in the study of Potoczna et al., obese patients, carriers of MC4R variants that presented an aggressive form of BED, were less responsive to weight loss after laparoscopic gastric banding treatment [125], while Vallette et al. did not find an influence of these genetic mutations in weight loss and body composition after the same surgical treatment [133]. A recent study evidenced that the presence of functional variants of MC4R significantly affected the efficacy of different laparoscopic operations in obese Swiss patients with BED, increasing the risk of reoperation due to a failure in postoperative weight loss [134].

These observations have encouraged further investigations of a possible involvement of MC4R mutations in different eating patterns, particularly in obese subjects, to explain and document the food attitudes leading to weight gain, hedonic overeating and behavioral addiction to obtain food rewards.

Valette et al. discussed how mutations could influence the choice and the preference for macronutrients: in obese adults, carriers of different functional mutations of MC4R, an increased carbohydrate intake compared to fat intake was reported. In the same study, using interviews with standardized questionnaires and binge eating scales, no statistical difference was found in eating behaviors in both carriers and non-carriers of MC4R mutations [135].

To investigate the impact of the complete loss of function of MC4R signaling on the brain response to anticipatory food reward, van der Klaauw et al. performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a small group of obese individuals with heterozygous MC4R mutations and in obese and lean individuals without mutations in satiated state. After seeing images of HPF, surprisingly, no group difference was found in the amygdala or orbitofrontal cortex, but a hyporesponsivity to visual food cues was reported in the dorsal and ventral striatum in obese controls, compared to the response of MC4R-deficient obese patients and lean controls [136]. The result of this study is particularly relevant, knowing that dorsal striatum is a brain region involved in compulsive food seeking behavior and BED, even in a sated state [137,138]. Indeed, the understanding of how different brain responses and behavioral factors are involved in rewarding food cues may explain the reason for the development of HPF overconsumption.

3.2.3. The Polymorphism rs17782313 Nearby MC4R Gene and Eating Behavior

Recently, a genomewide association study (GWAS) identified several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the MC4R gene, associated with high BMI and the risk of the development of obesity [139]. Among them, the SNP rs17782313, mapping to a locus 188kb downstream from the coding sequence of MC4R gene region, has become increasingly relevant in relation to obesity and aberrant eating behaviors [140]. Additionally, this SNP rs17782313 seems to affect expression and function of the MC4R and it has been proposed, in several studies, as a factor leading to altered eating behavior patterns, increased vulnerability to higher BMI and changes in human brain regions, especially in women and children [141,142,143,144].

In the study of Qi et al., high preference and intake of nutrients rich in fat, saturated fat and partly protein, without any appetite deregulation regarding carbohydrate, were found in women carriers of this SNP compared to the non-carrier participants [142], leading to an elevated risk of severe obesity. Moreover, the following works have tried to clarify the possible implication of this MC4R SNP in feeding behavior: Stutzmann et al. revealed an excessive appetite in a large cohort of European populations, especially eating a large amount of food during meals with a higher frequency of snacking in children and teenagers carriers of this SNP, and a greater hunger in adults carriers of the same polymorphism [143]. Snacking is a particular dietary pattern, principally during childhood, in which energy-dense and nutrient-poor food is consumed between meals exhibiting a recurrent “snack episode”, which can be translated into a bad feeding style and a risk factor for altered eating behavior and elevated BMI [145,146].

Furthermore, another study evidenced less postprandial satiation symptoms after a fully caloric satiating meal in obese individuals, carriers of rs17782313 polymorphism, promoting to eat more frequently and to increase the caloric intake in the subsequent meal, leading to higher BMI [147]. In addition, the presence of this genotypic variant demonstrated low satiety responsiveness scores, and high scores for enjoyment of food in Chilean obese children compared to the non-carrier participants [148], assessed through the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) [149] and 19-item Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire Parent (TFEQP-19) Chilean version of the TFEQ-R18 [150]. A following study, always conducted in a Chilean population, focused on obese children carriers of SNP rs17782313 revealing, in addition to lower satiety responsiveness and elevated enjoyment of food, even an overconsumption of snacks after a standard meal, using the Eating in the Absence of Hunger (EAH) Test and the CEBQ [17]. Moreover, in a three-generation Chilean family of obese women, the presence of a genetic variant of MC4R, generating an amino acid substitution Thr150Ile, characterized by a decreased activity of the MC4R, led to an elevated BMI and remarkable scores of cognitive restraint (CR), uncontrolled eating (UE) and emotional eating (EE), measured by TFEQ-R18 [19]. These three parameters indicate respectively: conscious lower consumption of HPF but higher intake of vegetables and proteins in order to control BMI; the tendency to eat unhealthy food more than usual in response to external stimuli with loss of control and hunger for extreme unstoppable appetite; and, finally, the inability to resist stress events, negative emotions and mood states, which often cause binge eating episodes [150,151,152]. These paradigms were also evaluated in Chilean adults, carriers of SNP rs17782313, presenting higher EE scores compared with non-carriers, while only women showed UE, evidencing a difference between women and men with this SNP [20].

Recent studies in obese, overweight and normal weight Chilean children extended the evidence about the SNP rs17782313, investigating how this genetic variant affects the ingestive behaviors related to reward properties of food [153]. Eating behavior scores were calculated from the EAH Test, CEBQ, TFEQ and Food Reinforcement Value Questionnaire (RVFQ), reporting differences between gender in eating patterns, but not in elevated BMI: in obese boys, carriers of the SNP, a significantly lower reinforcing value of food was observed compared to the non-carriers; meanwhile, obese girls, carriers of this polymorphism, showed lower satiety responsiveness, and UE with respect to obese girls without the SNP. These results are in accordance with the study of Vega et al., in which Chilean obese adults showed UE, suggesting the involvement of MC4R in dopamine pathways relating to food reward [153]. The hypothesis of a possible link between dopamine and melanocortin pathways has also been proposed by Yilmaz et al., underlying that this interaction could be responsible for the results of the study, in which, through the use of several questionnaires, significant EE, food craving, elevated BMI and depressive mood in European adult carriers of SNP rs17782313 were found [144]. Furthermore, the results of the case control comparisons with a group of female participants who had Anorexia or Bulimia Nervosa did not find any evidence that linked the genetic variant with these eating disorders [154].

The evidence concerning this specific polymorphism that might contribute to overweight and altered feeding patterns is not limited to the populations mentioned above, but it has been also investigated and found in subjects of different nationalities and ethnic origins [147,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162], where the majority of these studies addressed the vulnerability of women and children to moderate and severe obesity and aberrant eating behaviors [141,157,161,163].

Horstmann et al. suggested that the genetic variation rs17782313 could affect reward mechanisms, showing that only women, homozygous carriers of the risk SNP, demonstrated EE and Disinhibition of Eating (loss of control over feeding, possibly due to external stimuli) measured by TFEQ-R18 and TFEQ-51. Moreover, through Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), a sex-specific association was found between rs17782313 and an increased gray matter volume in the right amygdala, the anterior hippocampus, the medial orbitofrontal cortex and the left and the right PFC [141], crucial regions known to be involved in eating behavior [164,165].

All the studies discussed in this section (summarized in Table 2) highlighted that the partial or total loss of MC4R function, due to MC4R mutations, as well as the SNP rs17782313, are positively correlated with altered appetite and dysfunctional eating patterns, promoting obesity and elevated BMI.

Table 2

MC4R variant rs17782313 and manifestation of altered eating behavioral phenotype.

Subjects with the MC4R Variant rs17782313	Result	Ref.
Normal weight vs. obese children of both sexes	Obese children present high scores of Enjoyment of Food, Emotional Overeating, Food Responsiveness and lower Satiety Responsiveness	[17]
Adult participants	In both genders high scores of Emotional Eating associated with BMI were found, while only in women the Uncontrolled Eating scores were associated with BMI.	[20]
Healthy adult volunteers	Only women, especially homozygous carriers of MC4R variant rs17782313, demonstrated Emotional Eating and Disinhibition of Eating.	[141]
Adult women	Women had significantly higher intake of energy from fat, compared to carbohydrate.	[142]
Children, teenagers and adults	Children and teenagers presented snacking and eating large amounts of food during meals. Adults presented a greater hunger score	[143]
Adults between the ages of 24 and 50 years	Overeating behaviors, Emotional Eating and Food Cravings.	[144]
Overweight or obese participants	Less postprandial satiation symptoms after a fully caloric meal	[147]
Obese children	Low Satiety Responsiveness scores and high scores for the Enjoyment of Food	[148]
Obese, overweight and normal weight children	In obese girls were found significant lower scores of the Satiety Responsiveness and higher scores of the Uncontrolled Eating	[153]
Women	Association with increased BMI and obesity	[160,161,163]
Lean, overweight, andobese children	Association with increased BMI and obesity	[155,159]
Normal weight vs. obese adults	Association with increased BMI and obesity	[156,162]
Normal weight vs. obese adults	Association with increased BMI and obesity and a significant higher intake of energy from fat compared to carbohydrate.	[158]

BMI: Body Mass Index; MC4R: Melanocortin-4 receptor.

4. Melanocortin System and Stress Responses

Dieting, stress and negative affect are considered potential factors able to trigger binge eating episodes in patients with BED or Bulimia Nervosa [37,166,167]. Indeed, dieting periods are commonly observed in the history of binge eaters, but hunger alone appears to be non-sufficient to induce a compulsive-like eating, if not accompanied by conditions of stress or negative affect [168,169]. Stress has a central role in the etiology of binge eating, considering that obese individuals with BED, compared to those without, show a higher activity of the HPA axis and cortisol/corticosterone plasma level [170,171,172,173]. Additionally, higher cortisol levels, induced by stress, are able to promote a greater consumption of sweet foods [174], and are also positively correlated with the severity of binge eating [175].

The melanocortin system, principally via MC4R, has been demonstrated to play a central role in stress response and negative emotional states, including anxiety and depression [176,177], suggesting the MC4R as a possible target to treat these psychiatric conditions. In fact, MC4Rs are expressed in the limbic system, mainly in several nuclei of the amygdala, such as the central and basolateral nuclei, lateral septal nucleus, hippocampus and in the entorhinal cortex [50]; thus, the distribution of the MC4R in the brain indicates an important involvement of this receptor in promoting negative emotional states [176,177]. Moreover, the MC4R, contrary to MC3R, has been highly detected in the PVN of the hypothalamus, where it is supposed to regulate the activity of the HPA axis, via arginine vasopressin (AVP) and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) neurons [50,176]. Initial evidence linking the MC4R and stress-related responses comes from studies in which the administration of α-MSH and ACTH in rats was able to increase grooming behavior [99,100,101,178,179], characterized by many activities directed to the animal body surface, such as face washing, body grooming, licking, scratching and genital grooming, and proposed as a rodent behavioral response to stress and novel environments [178,180]. The effect of α-MSH on grooming is principally due to its agonistic activity on MC4Rs, as demonstrated by Adan et al., who found that grooming behavior, induced by MCR agonists, was positively correlated with a greater affinity and potency for MC4R, rather than for MC3R. On the contrary, the antagonist SHU-9119 attenuated grooming induced by both melanocortins and by exposure to a novel environment [178]. This finding is further confirmed by the fact that the MC4R agonist MTII increased grooming in WT, but not in mutant rats deficient in MC4Rs, confirming that this behavior is principally mediated by MC4Rs, and not by MC3R subtypes [181].

Stress has been demonstrated to have profound effects on MC4R expression and activity in the brain. In fact, the exposure to electric foot shock stress in rats increased the expression of POMC and MC4R mRNA in the hypothalamus and in the amygdala [182], region implicated in the modulation of emotional- and fear-related behaviors [183] and binge eating episodes [184,185].

Furthermore, rats exposed to chronic restraint stress had increased MC4R mRNA expression in the ARC of the hypothalamus, compared to control rats, not exposed to stress [186]. The effect of stress on MC4R and on feeding behavior and appetite may be also dependent on the intensity and duration of the stressor, as supported by the study of Chagra et al., in which chronic exposure to a stress induced a significant decrease in c-fos- and MC4R-expressing cells in the ARC, indicating a shift toward more orexigenic behaviors, differently from control and acutely stressed rats [187].

Pharmacological stimulation of the MC4R is able to promote the activity of the HPA axis, as reported by the study of Von Frijtag et al., in which i.c.v. injection of ACTH1-24 (the N-terminal bioactive fragment of ACTH) in rats, significantly increased plasma concentrations of ACTH and corticosterone, an effect inhibited by pretreatment with the non-selective antagonist SHU-9119 and by the selective MC4R antagonist [D-Arg8] ACTH4-10 [188]. The influence of the melanocortin system on HPA axis tone and activity can be explained considering that MC4Rs are highly expressed in the parvocellular division of the PVN [50,189], the region in which CRF neurons are also predominantly localized and where they receive α-MSH neuronal terminals [190,191].

In fact, activation of MC4Rs by i.c.v. injections of α-MSH or MTII increases gene expression of CRF in the PVN [189,192] and enhances corticosterone plasma levels in rats, suggesting a functional interaction between CRF and the melanocortin system [189]. In the same study, the pretreatment with the CRF antagonist α-helical-CRH9–41 was able to prevent MTII-induced suppression of food intake, evidencing that the melanocortin system can alter endogenous CRF levels in order to modulate appetite [189].

A stress procedure that has been demonstrated to promote activation of the melanocortin neurons, and, consequently, of the HPA axis, is the acute restraint stress. Rats exposed to this stress had a robust c-fos mRNA expression in the medial amygdala (MeA) [18,193], a brain region with high levels of MC4Rs [50], and particularly sensitive to psychological stressors, characterized by an emotional component, such as restraint [194,195]. Lesions of the MeA result in a blunted response of the HPA axis to psychogenic stressors [196], conversely to pharmacological stimulation of the MC4R-expressing neurons in the MeA, which promotes corticosterone release [18]. Moreover, both stress-induced anorexia and corticosterone release, in response to the acute restraint stress, can be prevented by administration of a MC4R antagonist directly in the MeA [18,193]. The interaction between MC4Rs in the MeA and the CRF system is probably mediated by the efferents from the MeA to the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis (BNST), brain region enriched in CRF neurons [197], and involved in stress-induced emotional responses and activation of the HPA axis [198,199]. The BNST has been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in stress-induced binge eating for HPF, evoked by a combination of frustration stress and food restriction [200,201], and injection of a non-selective CRF receptor antagonist directly into the BNST was able to counteract this compulsive-like eating episode for HPF selectively in rats exposed to both stress and restriction [200]. These findings support the hypothesis that MC4R can also influence the activation of the HPA axis via extrahypothalamic sites, and thus could represent an important factor for the development of aberrant feeding behaviors in response to stress exposure. Consistently with this evidence, acute stress-induced release of ACTH and corticosterone, as well as neuronal activation in the PVN and MeA, were significantly attenuated in male rats with a MC4R mutation, producing a less functional receptor, compared to the WT littermates [202,203]. Intriguingly, it was observed that female rats with the same mutation revealed an unexpected and exaggerated acute stress-induced corticosterone release, contrary to mutant males, highlighting a difference in stress reactivity between male and female rats with the MC4R loss of function [202]. The result of this study suggests a sex-dependent responsivity in the basal HPA axis tone and acute stress-induced corticosterone in rodents with MC4R mutation [202]. Considering the heightened stress reactivity found in female rats with deficient MC4R activity [202], and that stress has been associated with EE [37,38] and binge eating behavior [38,204,205,206], it would be interesting in the future to evaluate the potential involvement of MC4R signaling in a female rat model of binge eating, in which the binge eating episode is elicited by a combination of food restriction plus stress [86,87] and by using HPF, in order to promote the aberrant feeding behavior and to increase the motivation to overconsume food [38,87,207,208,209].

5. Conclusions

The pivotal role played by melanocortin system in controlling feeding behavior, appetite, energy balance and motivation for rewarding properties of food can explain why dysfunction of this system, in both human and rodent studies, results in a breakdown of normal regulatory processes and in more vulnerability to the loss of control in food intake, possibly leading to altered eating patterns, as summarized in Figure 2. Further research needs to highlight the mechanisms driving the hyperphagia in melanocortin-associated obesity, evidencing whether the exaggerated food consumption is accompanied by the loss of behavioral control, food seeking and/or binge eating episodes. Recent studies concerning MC3R and MC4R revealed that melanocortin signaling can exert functional effects in reward-related behaviors, due the hedonic properties of HPF, which is a potent natural reinforcer, and it has been postulated that in humans, low melanocortin activity could predispose individuals to pathological overeating, developing obesity and altered feeding behavior. Finally, the consistent relationship between the MC4R and stress response can be considered an additional factor linking melanocortin signaling to binge eating episodes, given the key role of stress in the etiology of this compulsive behavior. More preclinical studies are needed to investigate the biological mechanisms underlying dysfunctional eating patterns and clarify the possible connection between MCRs and binge eating behavior.

Figure 2

An overview of the altered eating patterns associated with the genetic variation of MC4R. ↓: decrease; ↑: increase; BMI: Body mass index; MC4R: Melanocortin-4 receptor.