Stephen J Nicholls1, A Michael Lincoff2, Michelle Garcia2, Dianna Bash2, Christie M Ballantyne3, Philip J Barter4, Michael H Davidson5, John J P Kastelein6, Wolfgang Koenig7, Darren K McGuire8, Dariush Mozaffarian9, Paul M Ridker10, Kausik K Ray11, Brian G Katona12, Anders Himmelmann13, Larrye E Loss12, Martin Rensfeldt13, Torbjörn Lundström13, Rahul Agrawal13, Venu Menon2, Kathy Wolski2, Steven E Nissen2. 1. Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Victorian Heart Institute, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 4. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 5. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 7. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany and Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 8. Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. 9. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 10. Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Imperial College of London, London, United Kingdom. 12. AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Late-stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic, Gaithersburg, Maryland. 13. AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Late-stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
Importance: It remains uncertain whether the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) reduce cardiovascular risk. Objective: To determine the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of a carboxylic acid formulation of EPA and DHA (omega-3 CA) with documented favorable effects on lipid and inflammatory markers in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia and high cardiovascular risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (enrollment October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last patient visit May 14, 2020) comparing omega-3 CA with corn oil in statin-treated participants with high cardiovascular risk, hypertriglyceridemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). A total of 13 078 patients were randomized at 675 academic and community hospitals in 22 countries in North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive 4 g/d of omega-3 CA (n = 6539) or corn oil, which was intended to serve as an inert comparator (n = 6539), in addition to usual background therapies, including statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Results: When 1384 patients had experienced a primary end point event (of a planned 1600 events), the trial was prematurely halted based on an interim analysis that indicated a low probability of clinical benefit of omega-3 CA vs the corn oil comparator. Among the 13 078 treated patients (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [9.0] years; 35% women; 70% with diabetes; median low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level, 75.0 mg/dL; median triglycerides level, 240 mg/dL; median HDL-C level, 36 mg/dL; and median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level, 2.1 mg/L), 12 633 (96.6%) completed the trial with ascertainment of primary end point status. The primary end point occurred in 785 patients (12.0%) treated with omega-3 CA vs 795 (12.2%) treated with corn oil (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.90-1.09]; P = .84). A greater rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was observed in the omega-3 CA group (24.7%) compared with corn oil-treated patients (14.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk, the addition of omega-3 CA, compared with corn oil, to usual background therapies resulted in no significant difference in a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings do not support use of this omega-3 fatty acid formulation to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.
RCT Entities:
Importance: It remains uncertain whether the omega-3 fatty acidseicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) reduce cardiovascular risk. Objective: To determine the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of a carboxylic acid formulation of EPA and DHA (omega-3 CA) with documented favorable effects on lipid and inflammatory markers in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia and high cardiovascular risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (enrollment October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last patient visit May 14, 2020) comparing omega-3 CA with corn oil in statin-treated participants with high cardiovascular risk, hypertriglyceridemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). A total of 13 078 patients were randomized at 675 academic and community hospitals in 22 countries in North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive 4 g/d of omega-3 CA (n = 6539) or corn oil, which was intended to serve as an inert comparator (n = 6539), in addition to usual background therapies, including statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Results: When 1384 patients had experienced a primary end point event (of a planned 1600 events), the trial was prematurely halted based on an interim analysis that indicated a low probability of clinical benefit of omega-3 CA vs the corn oil comparator. Among the 13 078 treated patients (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [9.0] years; 35% women; 70% with diabetes; median low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level, 75.0 mg/dL; median triglycerides level, 240 mg/dL; median HDL-C level, 36 mg/dL; and median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level, 2.1 mg/L), 12 633 (96.6%) completed the trial with ascertainment of primary end point status. The primary end point occurred in 785 patients (12.0%) treated with omega-3 CA vs 795 (12.2%) treated with corn oil (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.90-1.09]; P = .84). A greater rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was observed in the omega-3 CA group (24.7%) compared with corn oil-treated patients (14.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk, the addition of omega-3 CA, compared with corn oil, to usual background therapies resulted in no significant difference in a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings do not support use of this omega-3 fatty acid formulation to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.
Authors: Soon Ae Lee; Hye Jung Kim; Ki Churl Chang; Jong Chul Baek; Ji Kwon Park; Jeong Kyu Shin; Won Jun Choi; Jong Hak Lee; Won Young Paik Journal: Korean J Physiol Pharmacol Date: 2009-08-31 Impact factor: 2.016
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; William Christen; Shari S Bassuk; Samia Mora; Heike Gibson; Christine M Albert; David Gordon; Trisha Copeland; Denise D'Agostino; Georgina Friedenberg; Claire Ridge; Vadim Bubes; Edward L Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Julie E Buring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Irena B King; Xiaoling Song; Hongyan Huang; Frank M Sacks; Eric B Rimm; Molin Wang; David S Siscovick Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; A Michael Lincoff; Dianna Bash; Christie M Ballantyne; Philip J Barter; Michael H Davidson; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Darren K McGuire; Dariush Mozaffarian; Terje R Pedersen; Paul M Ridker; Kausik Ray; Björn W Karlson; Torbjörn Lundström; Kathy Wolski; Steven E Nissen Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Louise Bowman; Marion Mafham; Karl Wallendszus; Will Stevens; Georgina Buck; Jill Barton; Kevin Murphy; Theingi Aung; Richard Haynes; Jolyon Cox; Aleksandra Murawska; Allen Young; Michael Lay; Fang Chen; Emily Sammons; Emma Waters; Amanda Adler; Jonathan Bodansky; Andrew Farmer; Roger McPherson; Andrew Neil; David Simpson; Richard Peto; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Sarah Parish; Jane Armitage Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Liana C Del Gobbo; Fumiaki Imamura; Stella Aslibekyan; Matti Marklund; Jyrki K Virtanen; Maria Wennberg; Mohammad Y Yakoob; Stephanie E Chiuve; Luicito Dela Cruz; Alexis C Frazier-Wood; Amanda M Fretts; Eliseo Guallar; Chisa Matsumoto; Kiesha Prem; Tosh Tanaka; Jason H Y Wu; Xia Zhou; Catherine Helmer; Erik Ingelsson; Jian-Min Yuan; Pascale Barberger-Gateau; Hannia Campos; Paulo H M Chaves; Luc Djoussé; Graham G Giles; Jose Gómez-Aracena; Allison M Hodge; Frank B Hu; Jan-Håkan Jansson; Ingegerd Johansson; Kay-Tee Khaw; Woon-Puay Koh; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Lars Lind; Robert N Luben; Eric B Rimm; Ulf Risérus; Cecilia Samieri; Paul W Franks; David S Siscovick; Meir Stampfer; Lyn M Steffen; Brian T Steffen; Michael Y Tsai; Rob M van Dam; Sari Voutilainen; Walter C Willett; Mark Woodward; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: B Mihaylova; J Emberson; L Blackwell; A Keech; J Simes; E H Barnes; M Voysey; A Gray; R Collins; C Baigent Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-05-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: George Thanassoulis; Ken Williams; Keying Ye; Robert Brook; Patrick Couture; Patrick R Lawler; Jacqueline de Graaf; Curt D Furberg; Allan Sniderman Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Steven E Nissen; A Michael Lincoff; Kathy Wolski; Christie M Ballantyne; John J P Kastelein; Paul M Ridker; Kausik K Ray; Darren K McGuire; Dariush Mozaffarian; Wolfgang Koenig; Michael H Davidson; Michelle Garcia; Brian G Katona; Anders Himmelmann; Larrye E Loss; Matthew Poole; Venu Menon; Stephen J Nicholls Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Marco Lombardi; Salvatore Carbone; Marco Giuseppe Del Buono; Juan Guido Chiabrando; Giovanni Maria Vescovo; Massimiliano Camilli; Rocco Antonio Montone; Rocco Vergallo; Antonio Abbate; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Dave L Dixon; Filippo Crea Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother Date: 2021-07-23
Authors: Guo-Chong Chen; Rhonda Arthur; Li-Qiang Qin; Li-Hua Chen; Zhendong Mei; Yan Zheng; Yang Li; Tao Wang; Thomas E Rohan; Qibin Qi Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 19.112