| Literature DB >> 35467096 |
Christopher Blaum1, Natalie Arnold1,2, Christoph Waldeyer3,4.
Abstract
Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease have a high risk for subsequent cardiovascular events despite optimal drug treatment including statins and ezetimibe. Dyslipidemia represents a central and direct cause of this, with a frequent failure to achieve the target values recommended in the guidelines. New lipid-lowering substances are increasingly becoming available for treatment of this residual risk. Due to their high cost, cost-effectiveness analyses are required in order to justify their use. Important variables when considering the cost-effectiveness of a drug are quality adjusted life years (QALY) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The lower bounds of the ICER determining the cost-effectiveness of a treatment vary between healthcare systems. The proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors alirocumab and evolocumab are deemed to be cost-effective particularly in patients with high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) prior to treatment or with a high cardiovascular risk as determined by the presence of defined risk criteria. Similar considerations apply to the PCSK9 small interfering RNA (siRNA) inclisiran. Administration of bempedoic acid is deemed cost-effective especially in patients with statin intolerance. Eicosapentaenoic acid is deemed cost-effective overall, although the data with respect to the exact placebo-controlled efficacy are still inconclusive.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Coronary artery disease; Cost effectiveness; LDL cholesterol; Lipid-lowering agents
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35467096 DOI: 10.1007/s00059-022-05116-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Herz ISSN: 0340-9937 Impact factor: 1.443