Steven E Nissen1, A Michael Lincoff1, Kathy Wolski1, Christie M Ballantyne2, John J P Kastelein3, Paul M Ridker4, Kausik K Ray5, Darren K McGuire6, Dariush Mozaffarian7, Wolfgang Koenig8,9, Michael H Davidson10, Michelle Garcia1, Brian G Katona11, Anders Himmelmann12, Larrye E Loss11, Matthew Poole12, Venu Menon1, Stephen J Nicholls13. 1. Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 3. Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 4. Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Imperial College of London, London, England. 6. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. 7. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research) Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany. 9. Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. 10. University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 11. AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Late-stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic, Gaithersburg, Maryland. 12. AstraZeneca BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Late-stage Development, Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic, Gothenburg, Sweden. 13. Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: In patients treated with ω-3 fatty acids, it remains uncertain whether achieved levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are associated with cardiovascular outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between plasma levels of EPA and DHA and cardiovascular outcomes in a trial of ω-3 fatty acids compared with corn oil placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated triglyceride levels and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 675 centers (enrollment from October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last visit May 14, 2020). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive 4 g daily of ω-3 carboxylic acid (CA) or an inert comparator, corn oil. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary prespecified end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio, adjusted for baseline characteristics, for patients treated with the ω-3 CA compared with corn oil for the top tertile of achieved EPA and DHA plasma levels 12 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 13 078 total participants, 6539 (50%) were randomized to receive ω-3 CA and 6539 (50%) randomized to corn oil. ω-3 Fatty acid levels were available at both baseline and 12 months after randomization in 10 382 participants (5175 ω-3 CA patients [49.8%] and 5207 corn oil-treated patients [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.9] years, 3588 [34.6%] were women, 9025 [86.9%] were White, and 7285 [70.2%] had type 2 diabetes). The median plasma levels at 12 months in ω-3 CA patients were 89 μg/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 46-131 μg/mL) for EPA and 91 μg/mL (IQR, 71-114 μg/mL) for DHA with top tertile levels of 151 μg/mL (IQR, 132-181 μg/mL) and 118 μg/mL (IQR, 102-143 μg/mL), respectively. Compared with corn oil, the adjusted hazard ratios for the highest tertile of achieved plasma levels were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.83-1.16; P = .81) for EPA, and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.86-1.20; P = .85 for DHA. Sensitivity analyses based on changes in plasma and red blood cell levels of EPA and DHA and primary and secondary prevention subgroups showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients treated with ω-3 CA, the highest achieved tertiles of EPA and DHA were associated with neither benefit nor harm in patients at high cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.
IMPORTANCE: In patients treated with ω-3 fatty acids, it remains uncertain whether achieved levels of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) are associated with cardiovascular outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between plasma levels of EPA and DHA and cardiovascular outcomes in a trial of ω-3 fatty acids compared with corn oil placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, multicenter trial enrolled patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated triglyceride levels and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 675 centers (enrollment from October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last visit May 14, 2020). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized to receive 4 g daily of ω-3 carboxylic acid (CA) or an inert comparator, corn oil. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary prespecified end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. The primary outcome measure was the hazard ratio, adjusted for baseline characteristics, for patients treated with the ω-3 CA compared with corn oil for the top tertile of achieved EPA and DHA plasma levels 12 months after randomization. RESULTS: Of the 13 078 total participants, 6539 (50%) were randomized to receive ω-3 CA and 6539 (50%) randomized to corn oil. ω-3 Fatty acid levels were available at both baseline and 12 months after randomization in 10 382 participants (5175 ω-3 CA patients [49.8%] and 5207 corn oil-treated patients [50.2%]; mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.9] years, 3588 [34.6%] were women, 9025 [86.9%] were White, and 7285 [70.2%] had type 2 diabetes). The median plasma levels at 12 months in ω-3 CA patients were 89 μg/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 46-131 μg/mL) for EPA and 91 μg/mL (IQR, 71-114 μg/mL) for DHA with top tertile levels of 151 μg/mL (IQR, 132-181 μg/mL) and 118 μg/mL (IQR, 102-143 μg/mL), respectively. Compared with corn oil, the adjusted hazard ratios for the highest tertile of achieved plasma levels were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.83-1.16; P = .81) for EPA, and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.86-1.20; P = .85 for DHA. Sensitivity analyses based on changes in plasma and red blood cell levels of EPA and DHA and primary and secondary prevention subgroups showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients treated with ω-3 CA, the highest achieved tertiles of EPA and DHA were associated with neither benefit nor harm in patients at high cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Nancy R Cook; I-Min Lee; William Christen; Shari S Bassuk; Samia Mora; Heike Gibson; Christine M Albert; David Gordon; Trisha Copeland; Denise D'Agostino; Georgina Friedenberg; Claire Ridge; Vadim Bubes; Edward L Giovannucci; Walter C Willett; Julie E Buring Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Deepak L Bhatt; P Gabriel Steg; Michael Miller; Eliot A Brinton; Terry A Jacobson; Steven B Ketchum; Ralph T Doyle; Rebecca A Juliano; Lixia Jiao; Craig Granowitz; Jean-Claude Tardif; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jackie Bosch; Hertzel C Gerstein; Gilles R Dagenais; Rafael Díaz; Leanne Dyal; Hyejung Jung; Aldo P Maggiono; Jeffrey Probstfield; Ambady Ramachandran; Matthew C Riddle; Lars E Rydén; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; A Michael Lincoff; Dianna Bash; Christie M Ballantyne; Philip J Barter; Michael H Davidson; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Darren K McGuire; Dariush Mozaffarian; Terje R Pedersen; Paul M Ridker; Kausik Ray; Björn W Karlson; Torbjörn Lundström; Kathy Wolski; Steven E Nissen Journal: Clin Cardiol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 2.882
Authors: Louise Bowman; Marion Mafham; Karl Wallendszus; Will Stevens; Georgina Buck; Jill Barton; Kevin Murphy; Theingi Aung; Richard Haynes; Jolyon Cox; Aleksandra Murawska; Allen Young; Michael Lay; Fang Chen; Emily Sammons; Emma Waters; Amanda Adler; Jonathan Bodansky; Andrew Farmer; Roger McPherson; Andrew Neil; David Simpson; Richard Peto; Colin Baigent; Rory Collins; Sarah Parish; Jane Armitage Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen J Nicholls; A Michael Lincoff; Michelle Garcia; Dianna Bash; Christie M Ballantyne; Philip J Barter; Michael H Davidson; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Darren K McGuire; Dariush Mozaffarian; Paul M Ridker; Kausik K Ray; Brian G Katona; Anders Himmelmann; Larrye E Loss; Martin Rensfeldt; Torbjörn Lundström; Rahul Agrawal; Venu Menon; Kathy Wolski; Steven E Nissen Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Matthew J Budoff; Deepak L Bhatt; April Kinninger; Suvasini Lakshmanan; Joseph B Muhlestein; Viet T Le; Heidi T May; Kashif Shaikh; Chandana Shekar; Sion K Roy; John Tayek; John R Nelson Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Kevin C Maki; Harold E Bays; Christie M Ballantyne; James A Underberg; John J P Kastelein; Judith B Johnson; James J Ferguson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 6.106
Authors: Richard A Ferraro; Thorsten Leucker; Seth S Martin; Maciej Banach; Steven R Jones; Peter P Toth Journal: Drugs Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 11.431
Authors: Tamar S Polonsky; Amit Khera; Michael D Miedema; Douglas D Schocken; Peter W F Wilson Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 6.106