Literature DB >> 33189566

The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.

Christof Kaltenmeier1, Dana Jorgensen2, Stalin Dharmayan1, Subhashini Ayloo3, Vikrant Rachakonda4, David A Geller1, Samer Tohme1, Michele Molinari5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed if the risk of post-liver transplant mortality within 24 h could be stratified at the time of listing using the liver transplant risk score (LTRS). Secondary aims were to assess if the LTRS could stratify the risk of 30-day, 1-year mortality, and survival beyond the first year.
METHODS: MELD, BMI, age, diabetes, and the need for dialysis were the five variables used to calculate the LTRS during patients' evaluation for liver transplantation. Mortality rates at 24 h, 30 days, and 1-year were compared among groups of patients with different LTRS. Patients with ABO-incompatibility, redo, multivisceral, partial graft and malignancies except for hepatocellular carcinoma were excluded. Data of 48,616 adult liver transplant recipients were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2002 and 2017.
RESULTS: 24-h mortality was 0.9%, 1.0%, 1.1%, 1.7%, 2.3%, 2.0% and 3.5% for patients with LTRS of 0,1,2,3,4, 5 and ≥ 6, respectively (P < 0.001). 30-day mortality was 3.5%, 4.2%, 4.9%, 6.2%, 7.6%, 7.2% and 10.1% respectively (P < 0.001). 1-year mortality was 8.6%, 10.8%, 12.9%, 13.9%, 18.5%, 20.3% and 28.6% respectively (P < 0.001). 10-year survival was 61%, 56%, 57%, 54%, 47%, and 31% for patients with 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and ≥ 6 points respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Perioperative mortality and long-term survival of patients undergoing LT can be accurately estimated at the time of listing by the LTRS.
Copyright © 2020 International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33189566      PMCID: PMC8110600          DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  49 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in MELD score not only predict survival on the waiting list but also overall survival after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Georg P Györi; Gerd R Silberhumer; Sonja Zehetmayer; Barbara Kern; Hubert Hetz; Thomas Soliman; Rudolf Steininger; Ferdinand Mühlbacher; Gabriela A Berlakovich
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.782

Review 2.  A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model.

Authors:  D W Hosmer; T Hosmer; S Le Cessie; S Lemeshow
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Early mortality after liver transplantation: Defining the course and the cause.

Authors:  Fabio Baganate; Eliza W Beal; Dmitry Tumin; Daniel Azoulay; Khalid Mumtaz; Sylvester M Black; Kenneth Washburn; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Impact of acute-on-chronic liver failure on 90-day mortality following a first liver transplantation.

Authors:  Eric Levesque; Audrey Winter; Zaid Noorah; Jean-Pierre Daurès; Paul Landais; Cyrille Feray; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.828

5.  Impact of MELD score implementation on liver allocation: experience at a Brazilian center.

Authors:  Adriana Gonçalves da Silva Machado; Alfeu de Medeiros Fleck; Cláudio Marroni; Maria Lúcia Zanotelli; Guido Cantisani; Ajácio Bandeira de Mello Brandão
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.400

6.  Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

Authors:  G Teasdale; R Knill-Jones; J van der Sande
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Survival outcomes following liver transplantation (SOFT) score: a novel method to predict patient survival following liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Rana; M A Hardy; K J Halazun; D C Woodland; L E Ratner; B Samstein; J V Guarrera; R S Brown; J C Emond
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  D-MELD, a simple predictor of post liver transplant mortality for optimization of donor/recipient matching.

Authors:  J B Halldorson; R Bakthavatsalam; O Fix; J D Reyes; J D Perkins
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 8.086

9.  Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Rafik M Ghobrial; Jeffery Gornbein; Randy Steadman; Natale Danino; James F Markmann; Curtis Holt; Dean Anselmo; Farin Amersi; Pauline Chen; Douglas G Farmer; Steve Han; Francisco Derazo; Sammy Saab; Leonard I Goldstein; Sue V McDiarmid; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Predictive modeling of treatment resistant depression using data from STAR*D and an independent clinical study.

Authors:  Zhi Nie; Srinivasan Vairavan; Vaibhav A Narayan; Jieping Ye; Qingqin S Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.