Literature DB >> 23619261

Impact of MELD score implementation on liver allocation: experience at a Brazilian center.

Adriana Gonçalves da Silva Machado1, Alfeu de Medeiros Fleck, Cláudio Marroni, Maria Lúcia Zanotelli, Guido Cantisani, Ajácio Bandeira de Mello Brandão.   

Abstract

Introduction. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is an accurate predictor of mortality in patients with cirrhosis, and has been used on liver allocation in Brazil since 2006. However, its impact on organ allocation, waiting list and post-transplant mortality is still poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of the MELD system on liver allocation and mortality after liver transplantation (LT) in Southern Brazil. Material and methods. Adult patients with chronic liver disease on the waiting list for primary deceased-donor LT were divided into two cohorts (pre- and post-MELD implementation) according to the date of waiting list placement. Disease severity, as assessed by MELD score at placement, was similar in both cohorts. Patients were followed for at least 18 months to assess the outcomes of interest (death/LT). Results. Higher MELD scores correlated with waiting list mortality, which increased 20% with each additional point (HR 1.2; 95%CI 1.14-2.26; p < 0.001). Waiting list mortality was 30.9% before and 21.7% after MELD implementation (nonsignificant). Transplant rate increased after MELD implementation (52 vs. 40%, p = 0.002). After excluding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, mean MELD scores at LT were significantly higher in the MELD era (p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between MELD scores at LT and post-LT survival. During 18-month follow-up, post-LT mortality rate was 25.4% before and 20% after MELD implementation (nonsignificant). Conclusion. MELD implementation was associated with a reduction in waiting list mortality. Although sicker patients received LT in the MELD era, post-transplant survival was similar in both periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23619261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hepatol        ISSN: 1665-2681            Impact factor:   2.400


  3 in total

1.  The liver transplant risk score prognosticates the outcomes of liver transplant recipients at listing.

Authors:  Christof Kaltenmeier; Dana Jorgensen; Stalin Dharmayan; Subhashini Ayloo; Vikrant Rachakonda; David A Geller; Samer Tohme; Michele Molinari
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Modelling kidney outcomes based on MELD eras - impact of MELD score in renal endpoints after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Paulo Ricardo Gessolo Lins; Roberto Camargo Narciso; Leonardo Rolim Ferraz; Virgilio Gonçalves Pereira; Ben-Hur Ferraz-Neto; Marcio Dias De Almeida; Bento Fortunato Cardoso Dos Santos; Oscar Fernando Pavão Dos Santos; Júlio Cesar Martins Monte; Marcelino Souza Durão Júnior; Marcelo Costa Batista
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.585

3.  Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplant in Elderly Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Is There an Appropriate Upper Age Cutoff?

Authors:  David S Goldberg; Rodrigo M Vianna; Eric Fleming Martin; Paul Martin; Leopoldo Ramon Arosemena Benitez; Christopher Blackburn O'Brien; Kalyan R Bhamidimarri
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.939

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.