Literature DB >> 12192318

Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients.

Rafik M Ghobrial1, Jeffery Gornbein, Randy Steadman, Natale Danino, James F Markmann, Curtis Holt, Dean Anselmo, Farin Amersi, Pauline Chen, Douglas G Farmer, Steve Han, Francisco Derazo, Sammy Saab, Leonard I Goldstein, Sue V McDiarmid, Ronald W Busuttil.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prognostic model that determines patient survival outcomes after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) using readily available pretransplant variables. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The current liver organ allocation system strongly favors organ distribution to critically ill recipients who exhibit poor survival outcomes following OLT. A severely limited organ resource, increasing waiting list deaths, and rising numbers of critically ill recipients mandate an organ allocation system that balances disease severity with survival outcomes. Such goals can be realized only through the development of prognostic models that predict survival following OLT.
METHODS: Variables that may affect patient survival following OLT were analyzed in hepatitis C (HCV) recipients at the authors' center, since HCV is the most common indication for OLT. The resulting patient survival model was examined and refined in HCV and non-HCV patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Kaplan-Meier methods, univariate comparisons, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression were employed for analyses.
RESULTS: Variables identified by multivariate analysis as independent predictors for patient survival following primary transplantation of adult HCV recipients in the last 10 years at the authors' center were entered into a prognostic survival model to predict patient survival. Accordingly, mortality was predicted by 0.0293 (recipient age) + 1.085 (log10 recipient creatinine) + 0.289 (donor female gender) + 0.675 urgent UNOS - 1.612 (log10 recipient creatinine times urgent UNOS). The above variables, in addition to donor age, total bilirubin, prothrombin time (PT), retransplantation, and warm and cold ischemia times, were applied to the UNOS database. Of the 46,942 patients transplanted over the last 10 years, 25,772 patients had complete data sets. An eight-factor model that accurately predicted survival was derived. Accordingly, the mortality index posttransplantation = 0.0084 donor age + 0.019 recipient age + 0.816 log creatinine + 0.0044 warm ischemia (in minutes) + 0.659 (if second transplant) + 0.10 log bilirubin + 0.0087 PT + 0.01 cold ischemia (in hours). Thus, this model is applicable to first or second liver transplants. Patient survival rates based on model-predicted risk scores for death and observed posttransplant survival rates were similar. Additionally, the model accurately predicted survival outcomes for HCV and non-HCV patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Posttransplant patient survival can be accurately predicted based on eight straightforward factors. The balanced application of a model for liver transplant survival estimate, in addition to disease severity, as estimated by the model for end-stage liver disease, would markedly improve survival outcomes and maximize patients' benefits following OLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12192318      PMCID: PMC1422585          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200209000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  25 in total

1.  MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation.

Authors:  R H Wiesner; S V McDiarmid; P S Kamath; E B Edwards; M Malinchoc; W K Kremers; R A Krom; W R Kim
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Liver transplant waiting time does not correlate with waiting list mortality: implications for liver allocation policy.

Authors:  R B Freeman; E B Edwards
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Preliminary results of a liver allocation plan using a continuous medical severity score that de-emphasizes waiting time.

Authors:  R B Freeman; R J Rohrer; E Katz; W D Lewis; R Jenkins; A B Cosimi; F Delmonico; A Friedman; M Lorber; K O'Connor; J Bradley
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Prognostic value of preoperatively obtained clinical and laboratory data in predicting survival following orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  V Cuervas-Mons; I Millan; J S Gavaler; T E Starzl; D H Van Thiel
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Predicting outcomes after liver transplantation. A connectionist approach.

Authors:  H R Doyle; I Dvorchik; S Mitchell; I R Marino; F H Ebert; J McMichael; J J Fung
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Prioritization and organ distribution for liver transplantation.

Authors:  O Bronsther; J J Fung; A Izakis; D Van Thiel; T E Starzl
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-01-12       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients.

Authors:  R M Ghobrial; R Steadman; J Gornbein; C Lassman; C D Holt; P Chen; D G Farmer; H Yersiz; N Danino; E Collisson; A Baquarizo; S S Han; S Saab; L I Goldstein; J A Donovan; K Esrason; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Predictors of survival after In vivo split liver transplantation: analysis of 110 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R M Ghobrial; H Yersiz; D G Farmer; F Amersi; J Goss; P Chen; S Dawson; S Lerner; N Nissen; D Imagawa; S Colquhoun; W Arnout; S V McDiarmid; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Preoperative factors associated with outcome and their impact on resource use in 1148 consecutive primary liver transplants.

Authors:  J F Markmann; J W Markmann; D A Markmann; A Bacquerizo; J Singer; C D Holt; J Gornbein; H Yersiz; M Morrissey; S M Lerner; S V McDiarmid; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  The use of marginal donors for liver transplantation. A retrospective study of 365 liver donors.

Authors:  E Mor; G B Klintmalm; T A Gonwa; H Solomon; M J Holman; J F Gibbs; I Watemberg; R M Goldstein; B S Husberg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Recurrent hepatitis C post-transplantation: where are we now and where do we go from here? A report from the Canadian transplant hepatology workshop.

Authors:  Kymberly D S Watt; Kelly Burak; Marc Deschênes; Les Lilly; Denis Marleau; Paul Marotta; Andrew Mason; Kevork M Peltekian; Eberhard L Renner; Eric M Yoshida
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Using Bayesian networks to predict survival of liver transplant patients.

Authors:  Nathan Hoot; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

3.  Post-transplant survival is improved for hepatitis C recipients who are RNA negative at time of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Brett E Fortune; Alvaro Martinez-Camacho; Sarah Kreidler; Jane Gralla; Gregory T Everson
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.782

4.  Liver retransplantation in adults: a single-centre, 25-year experience.

Authors:  Ravi Marudanayagam; Vivekanandan Shanmugam; Bynvant Sandhu; Bridget K Gunson; Darius F Mirza; David Mayer; John Buckels; Simon R Bramhall
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Using old liver grafts for liver transplantation: where are the limits?

Authors:  Carlos Jiménez-Romero; Oscar Caso Maestro; Félix Cambra Molero; Iago Justo Alonso; Cristina Alegre Torrado; Alejandro Manrique Municio; Jorge Calvo Pulido; Carmelo Loinaz Segurola; Enrique Moreno González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients.

Authors:  Ivan Dias de Campos Junior; Raquel Silveira Bello Stucchi; Elisabete Yoko Udo; Ilka de Fátima Santana Ferreira Boin
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 6.047

7.  Living donor liver transplantation for high model for end-stage liver disease score: What have we learned?

Authors:  Hany Dabbous; Mohammad Sakr; Sara Abdelhakam; Iman Montasser; Mohamed Bahaa; Hany Said; Mahmoud El-Meteini
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-08

8.  Physician predictions of graft survival following liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nathan R Hoot; Irene D Feurer; Mary T Austin; Michael K Porayko; J Kelly Wright; Nancy M Lorenzi; C Wright Pinson; Dominik Aronsky
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: experience with more than 200 patients over a 17-year period.

Authors:  Douglas G Farmer; Dean M Anselmo; R Mark Ghobrial; Hasan Yersiz; Suzanne V McDiarmid; Carlos Cao; Michael Weaver; Jesus Figueroa; Khurram Khan; Jorge Vargas; Sammy Saab; Steven Han; Francisco Durazo; Leonard Goldstein; Curtis Holt; Ronald W Busuttil
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Long-term results using old liver grafts for transplantation: sexagenerian versus liver donors older than 70 years.

Authors:  Carlos Jiménez-Romero; Marta Clemares-Lama; Alejandro Manrique-Municio; Alvaro García-Sesma; Jorge Calvo-Pulido; Enrique Moreno-González
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.