Literature DB >> 690637

Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

G Teasdale, R Knill-Jones, J van der Sande.   

Abstract

Head-injured patients were examined by a number of observers whose assessments were compared. Considerable discrepancies occurred when overall "levels" of consciousness and coma were used, and also with some terms which are in common use. More consistent assessments were obtained by employing the "Glasgow Coma Scale," which describes eye opening, verbal behaviour, and motor responsiveness. Nurses and general surgeons were as consistent as neurosurgeons when using this scale, and it was relatively resistant to language or cultural differences between observers. The practical reliability of the Glasgow scale enhances its value, both for monitoring individual cases and for making meaningful comparisons between series of patients with acute brain damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 690637      PMCID: PMC493103          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.41.7.603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  8 in total

1.  OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE ENDOSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES. A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION OF THE DIAGNOSTIC VALIDITY OF ESOPHAGOSCOPY.

Authors:  H O CONN; H W SMITH; M BRODOFF
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-04-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Severe head injuries in three countries.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; S Galbraith; J Pickard; H Grant; R Braakman; C Avezaat; A Maas; J Minderhoud; C J Vecht; J Heiden; R Small; W Caton; T Kurze
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Discrepancies in recorded results from duplicate neurological history and examination in patients studied for prognosis in cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  C Sisk; D K Ziegler; T Zileli
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1970 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Measuring the outcome from head injuries.

Authors:  T W Langfitt
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; R Braakman; J Minderhoud; R Knill-Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A prospective study of nontraumatic coma: methods and results in 310 patients.

Authors:  D Bates; J J Caronna; N E Cartlidge; R P Knill-Jones; D E Levy; D A Shaw; F Plum
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 10.422

  8 in total
  40 in total

1.  Treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage with human albumin: ALISAH study. Rationale and design.

Authors:  Jose I Suarez; Renee H Martin
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Accident and emergency medicine--I.

Authors:  R C Evans; R J Evans
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.

Authors:  Joshua Kornbluth; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 4.  The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review.

Authors:  Florence C M Reith; Ruben Van den Brande; Anneliese Synnot; Russell Gruen; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: a systematic review.

Authors:  David S Rosen; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.210

6.  The role of cardiac troponin I in prognostication of patients with isolated severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Stephen S Cai; Brandon W Bonds; Peter F Hu; Deborah M Stein
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.313

7.  Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85).

Authors:  D Stålhammar; J E Starmark; E Holmgren; N Eriksson; C H Nordström; O Fedders; B Rosander
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Inter-observer variation in the evaluation of neurological signs: patient-related factors.

Authors:  M Hansen; P B Christensen; S H Sindrup; N K Olsen; O Kristensen; M L Friis
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Importance of leukoaraiosis on CT for tissue plasminogen activator decision making: evaluation of the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study.

Authors:  Andrew M Demchuk; Firosh Khan; Michael D Hill; Philip A Barber; Brian Silver; Suresh Patel; Steven R Levine
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Level of consciousness and age as prognostic factors in aneurysmal SAH.

Authors:  R Deruty; I Pelissou-Guyotat; C Mottolese; D Amat; L Bognar
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.