Literature DB >> 3317846

Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

H K Genant1, J E Block, P Steiger, C C Glueer, R Smith.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) has been widely investigated and applied in recent years as a means for noninvasive quantitative bone mineral determination. The usefulness of computed tomography for measurement of bone mineral lies in its ability to provide a quantitative image and, thereby, measure trabecular, cortical, or integral bone, centrally or peripherally. For measuring the spine, the potential advantages of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) over dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) are its capability for precise three-dimensional anatomic localization providing a direct density measurement, and its capability for spatial separation of highly responsive cancellous bone from less responsive compact bone. Currently, QCT vertebral mineral determination has been implemented at over 800 sites encompassing a wide geographic distribution and a wide array of commercial scanners. With a world-wide distribution of approximately 8,000 advanced CT body scanners, the capability now exists for widespread application of vertebral bone mineral determination by quantitative computed tomography. These QCT techniques for vertebral mineral determination have been used to study skeletal changes in osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. Longitudinal and cross-sectional bone mass measurements have been obtained at the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) in over 3,000 patients seen clinically or on research protocols. The results presented here illustrate the use of QCT spinal mineral measurement in the delineation of normal age-related bone loss, in the evaluation of estrogen effects on bone, in the assessment of fracture threshold and risk, and in the study of the effects of various exercise regimens on bone mineral and the determination of relationships to other techniques of bone mineral measurement. The laboratory and clinical results presented herein indicate that QCT provides a reliable means to evaluate and monitor the many forms of osteoporosis and the various interventions aimed at ameliorating this condition. The greatest advantages of spinal QCT for noninvasive bone mineral measurement lie in the high precision of the technique, the high sensitivity of the vertebral trabecular measurement site, and the potential for widespread application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3317846     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(87)80024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  28 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement.

Authors:  J P Sabatier; G Guaydier-Souquieres
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Osteoporosis and Bone Density Studies: Does treatment help decrease mineral loss?

Authors:  L Ehrlich
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Predicting the Biomechanical Strength of Proximal Femur Specimens with Minkowski Functionals and Support Vector Regression.

Authors:  Chien-Chun Yang; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Thomas M Link; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-13

4.  A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L Strause; M Bracker; P Saltman; D Sartoris; E Kerr
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Characterizing Trabecular Bone structure for Assessing Vertebral Fracture Risk on Volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Walter A Checefsky; Anas Z Abidin; Halley Tsai; Xixi Wang; Susan K Hobbs; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-17

Review 6.  Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Authors:  Sara Guerri; Daniele Mercatelli; Maria Pilar Aparisi Gómez; Alessandro Napoli; Giuseppe Battista; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Alberto Bazzocchi
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-02

7.  Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Del Rio; F Pons; M Huguet; F J Setoain; J Setoain
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

8.  Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.

Authors:  B Juhász; K Gulyás; Á Horváth; Z Pethő; H P Bhattoa; A Váncsa; É Szekanecz; C Horváth; J Kocsis; Z Horváth; K Hodosi; S Szántó; G Szűcs; Z Szekanecz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  [Fixation of distal radial fractures with the Targon DR nail].

Authors:  Georg Gradl; Martina Wendt; Philip Gierer; Markus Beck; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.154

10.  A population-based comparison of quantitative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with dual-photon absorptiometry of the spine and hip.

Authors:  T L Holbrook; E Barrett-Connor; M Klauber; D Sartoris
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.