Literature DB >> 2667870

Noninvasive methods of bone-mass measurement.

J P Sabatier1, G Guaydier-Souquieres.   

Abstract

The most widely used noninvasive methods of bone mass measurement include: single photon absorptiometry (SPA), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), dual photon absorptiometry (DPA and DEXA). SPA is used to measure bone mineral content (BMC) of the distal radius. Its advantages are low cost and high precision in vivo (less than 2%), however, correlation between axial and appendicular bone values is poor. Since vertebral fracture is the first complication of osteoporosis, spinal values are the most useful. QCT measurements are performed using available CT scanners and either single or dual energy scanning techniques, computed radiographs for localizing regions-of-interest (ROI) and mineral reference standards for calibration. The advantage of QCT is that it can evaluate pure trabecular bone at the midplane of two to four lumbar vertebral bodies. Single energy in vivo reproducibility is 2-5% in osteoporotics. Radiation exposure with most systems is 100-500 mRem. With DPA scanners, the commonest radiation source used is Gadolinium-153 (44-100keV). The areas of measurement are lumbar vertebrae L2, L3 and L4 and the femoral neck. In vivo lumbar measurement precision is at least 1-2% and radiation exposure is low (less than 10 mRem). DEXA scanners use an X-ray rather than gamma ray source to emit dual energy photons. The advantages of the technique are shorter scan time, lower radiation exposure (less than 3 mRem) and higher precision (less than 1%). In conclusion, measurement of vertebral bone, particularly using DPA and DEXA, is of value in assessing the risk of osteoporosis and in monitoring changes in bone mineral content.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2667870     DOI: 10.1007/bf02207232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  11 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; J E Block; P Steiger; C C Glueer; R Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 2.  Methodologies for the measurement of bone density and their precision and accuracy.

Authors:  P N Goodwin
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  [Value and limitations of the computed x-ray tomographic measurement of vertebral mineralization].

Authors:  A M Laval-Jeantet; M Laval-Jeantet; B Roger; C Scott; P F Delmas
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1984-03

4.  Errors in measuring trabecular bone by computed tomography due to marrow and bone composition.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  [Spinal biphotonic absorptiometry].

Authors:  J P Sabatier; G Guaydier-Souquières; F Courthéoux; F Rivaton; G Loyau
Journal:  Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic       Date:  1985-12

Review 6.  Osteoporosis: the state of the art in 1987: a review.

Authors:  S H Wasserman; U S Barzel
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Bone mass in women with hip fracture.

Authors:  S A Eriksson; T L Widhe
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1988-02

8.  Importance of measurement of spongious vertebral bone mineral density in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C D Jones; A M Laval-Jeantet; M H Laval-Jeantet; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine, I. Theory and application of a new two-dimensional dual-photon attenuation method.

Authors:  B Krølner; S Pors Nielsen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Bone mineral content in early-postmenopausal and postmenopausal osteoporotic women: comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  W D Reinbold; H K Genant; U J Reiser; S T Harris; B Ettinger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Periprosthetic bone remodeling after 12 years differs in cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Prakash Chandran; Mohammed Azzabi; Mark Andrews; John G Bradley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up.

Authors:  Sandro Hodel; Frank J P Beeres; Reto Babst; Björn-Christian Link
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-05-25

3.  Femoral volumetric bone density, geometry, and strength in relation to 25-hydroxy vitamin D in older men.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Martin; Elizabeth M Haney; Jackie Shannon; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Tony M Keaveny; Joseph M Zmuda; Eric S Orwoll; Stephanie Litwack Harrison; Lynn M Marshall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.741

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.