Literature DB >> 29200590

Characterizing Trabecular Bone structure for Assessing Vertebral Fracture Risk on Volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Mahesh B Nagarajan1, Walter A Checefsky1, Anas Z Abidin1, Halley Tsai1, Xixi Wang1, Susan K Hobbs1, Jan S Bauer2, Thomas Baum2, Axel Wismüller1,3.   

Abstract

While the proximal femur is preferred for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in fracture risk estimation, the introduction of volumetric quantitative computed tomography has revealed stronger associations between BMD and spinal fracture status. In this study, we propose to capture properties of trabecular bone structure in spinal vertebrae with advanced second-order statistical features for purposes of fracture risk assessment. For this purpose, axial multi-detector CT (MDCT) images were acquired from 28 spinal vertebrae specimens using a whole-body 256-row CT scanner with a dedicated calibration phantom. A semi-automated method was used to annotate the trabecular compartment in the central vertebral slice with a circular region of interest (ROI) to exclude cortical bone; pixels within were converted to values indicative of BMD. Six second-order statistical features derived from gray-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCM) and the mean BMD within the ROI were then extracted and used in conjunction with a generalized radial basis functions (GRBF) neural network to predict the failure load of the specimens; true failure load was measured through biomechanical testing. Prediction performance was evaluated with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) metric. The best prediction performance was observed with GLCM feature 'correlation' (RMSE = 1.02 ± 0.18), which significantly outperformed all other GLCM features (p < 0.01). GLCM feature correlation also significantly outperformed MDCT-measured mean BMD (RMSE = 1.11 ± 0.17) (p < 10-4). These results suggest that biomechanical strength prediction in spinal vertebrae can be significantly improved through characterization of trabecular bone structure with GLCM-derived texture features.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minkowski Functionals; Spinal vertebrae; biomechanical strength prediction; bone mineral density; multi-detector computed tomography; support vector regression; trabecular bone

Year:  2015        PMID: 29200590      PMCID: PMC5704731          DOI: 10.1117/12.2082059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  20 in total

1.  Scaling-index method as an image processing tool in scanning-probe microscopy.

Authors:  F Jamitzky; R W Stark; W Bunk; S Thalhammer; C Rath; T Aschenbrenner; G E Morfill; W M Heckl
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.689

2.  Model-free functional MRI analysis based on unsupervised clustering.

Authors:  Axel Wismüller; Anke Meyer-Bäse; Oliver Lange; Dorothee Auer; Maximilian F Reiser; DeWitt Sumners
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Cluster analysis of signal-intensity time course in dynamic breast MRI: does unsupervised vector quantization help to evaluate small mammographic lesions?

Authors:  Gerda Leinsinger; Thomas Schlossbauer; Michael Scherr; Oliver Lange; Maximilian Reiser; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Performance of topological texture features to classify fibrotic interstitial lung disease patterns.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Gerda Leinsinger; Roger Eibel; Lawrence A Ray; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of trabecular bone in MR images with geometric features and support vector regression.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Sarah L Lancianese; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Imoh Z Ikpot; Amy L Lerner; Axel Wismuller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 7.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; J E Block; P Steiger; C C Glueer; R Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures.

Authors:  T F Lang; G Guglielmi; C van Kuijk; A De Serio; M Cammisa; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Classification of small lesions in dynamic breast MRI: Eliminating the need for precise lesion segmentation through spatio-temporal analysis of contrast enhancement over time.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Andrzej Krol; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Mach Vis Appl       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.012

View more
  3 in total

1.  Application of a Novel Ultra-High Resolution Multi-Detector CT in Quantitative Imaging of Trabecular Microstructure.

Authors:  G Shi; S Subramanian; Q Cao; S Demehri; J H Siewerdsen; W Zbijewski
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Segmentation of the Proximal Femur from MR Images using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Cem M Deniz; Siyuan Xiang; R Spencer Hallyburton; Arakua Welbeck; James S Babb; Stephen Honig; Kyunghyun Cho; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Quantifying Subresolution 3D Morphology of Bone with Clinical Computed Tomography.

Authors:  S S Karhula; M A J Finnilä; S J O Rytky; D M Cooper; J Thevenot; M Valkealahti; K P H Pritzker; M Haapea; A Joukainen; P Lehenkari; H Kröger; R K Korhonen; H J Nieminen; S Saarakkala
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.