Literature DB >> 29170582

Predicting the Biomechanical Strength of Proximal Femur Specimens with Minkowski Functionals and Support Vector Regression.

Chien-Chun Yang1, Mahesh B Nagarajan1, Markus B Huber1, Julio Carballido-Gamio2, Jan S Bauer3, Thomas Baum3, Felix Eckstein4, Eva-Maria Lochmüller4, Thomas M Link2, Axel Wismüller1.   

Abstract

Regional trabecular bone quality estimation for purposes of femoral bone strength prediction is important for improving the clinical assessment of osteoporotic fracture risk. In this study, we explore the ability of 3D Minkowski Functionals derived from multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) images of proximal femur specimens in predicting their corresponding biomechanical strength. MDCT scans were acquired for 50 proximal femur specimens harvested from human cadavers. An automated volume of interest (VOI)-fitting algorithm was used to define a consistent volume in the femoral head of each specimen. In these VOIs, the trabecular bone micro-architecture was characterized by statistical moments of its BMD distribution and by topological features derived from Minkowski Functionals. A linear multi-regression analysis and a support vector regression (SVR) algorithm with a linear kernel were used to predict the failure load (FL) from the feature sets; the predicted FL was compared to the true FL determined through biomechanical testing. The prediction performance was measured by the root mean square error (RMSE) for each feature set. The best prediction result was obtained from the Minkowski Functional surface used in combination with SVR, which had the lowest prediction error (RMSE = 0.939 ± 0.345) and which was significantly lower than mean BMD (RMSE = 1.075 ± 0.279, p<0.005). Our results indicate that the biomechanical strength prediction can be significantly improved in proximal femur specimens with Minkowski Functionals extracted from on MDCT images used in conjunction with support vector regression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minkowski Functionals; biomechanical strength prediction; bone mineral density; multi-detector computed tomography; support vector regression; trabecular bone

Year:  2014        PMID: 29170582      PMCID: PMC5697789          DOI: 10.1117/12.2041782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng        ISSN: 0277-786X


  19 in total

1.  Bone strength at clinically relevant sites displays substantial heterogeneity and is best predicted from site-specific bone densitometry.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Christoph A Lill; Volker Kuhn; Erich Schneider; Günter Delling; Ralph Müller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Performance of topological texture features to classify fibrotic interstitial lung disease patterns.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Gerda Leinsinger; Roger Eibel; Lawrence A Ray; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Prediction of biomechanical properties of trabecular bone in MR images with geometric features and support vector regression.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Sarah L Lancianese; Mahesh B Nagarajan; Imoh Z Ikpot; Amy L Lerner; Axel Wismuller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Classification of small lesions on dynamic breast MRI: Integrating dimension reduction and out-of-sample extension into CADx methodology.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Andrzej Krol; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 6.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; J E Block; P Steiger; C C Glueer; R Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone.

Authors:  V Bousson; A Le Bras; F Roqueplan; Y Kang; D Mitton; S Kolta; C Bergot; W Skalli; E Vicaut; W Kalender; K Engelke; J-D Laredo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Proximal femur specimens: automated 3D trabecular bone mineral density analysis at multidetector CT--correlation with biomechanical strength measurement.

Authors:  Markus B Huber; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Jan S Bauer; Thomas Baum; Felix Eckstein; Eva M Lochmüller; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Classification of small lesions in dynamic breast MRI: Eliminating the need for precise lesion segmentation through spatio-temporal analysis of contrast enhancement over time.

Authors:  Mahesh B Nagarajan; Markus B Huber; Thomas Schlossbauer; Gerda Leinsinger; Andrzej Krol; Axel Wismüller
Journal:  Mach Vis Appl       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.012

10.  Improved performance of hip DXA using a novel region of interest in the upper part of the femoral neck: in vitro study using bone strength as a standard of reference.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Felix Eckstein; Caecilia Wunderer; Volker Kuhn; Eva-Maria Lochmueller; Karin Schreiber; Dirk Mueller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.