Literature DB >> 7641748

Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

L Del Rio1, F Pons, M Huguet, F J Setoain, J Setoain.   

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that lateral (LAT) spine bone mass measurements by absorptiometry may be more sensitive for detecting bone loss than the standard anteroposterior (AP) projection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of LAT spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and its diagnostic sensitivity. A group of 1554 subjects with no risk factors that might affect bone metabolism and 185 osteoporotic patients with vertebral fractures were studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine (standard AP and LAT projections) and proximal femur with a DEXA absorptiometer. The precision of the measurements was assessed in 15 volunteers. Diagnostic sensitivity was evaluated by the Z-score method. Comparing young people and the elderly, spine bone loss in the latter was similar for AP and LAT projections, when it was evaluated in absolute values (glcm2). However, when it was evaluated in percentage terms, bone loss was about twice as high in the LAT projection. LAT spine BMD correlated significantly with all the other areas assessed. The best correlation was found with the standard AP projection (r = 0.67, P < 0.0001). The precision in the LAT projection was found to be within an acceptable range (1.6% in normal subjects, 2% in osteoporotic patients), even though it was about twice that obtained in the AP projection. Diagnostic sensitivity was also better with the AP projection. It is concluded that LAT spine BMD measurements can be assessed with acceptable precision although it is about twice as high as for AP spine measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7641748     DOI: 10.1007/bf00839054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  19 in total

1.  DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

Authors:  R B Mazess; C A Gifford; J P Bisek; H S Barden; J A Hanson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Quantitative computed tomography in assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  H K Genant; J E Block; P Steiger; C C Glueer; R Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.446

4.  Impact of marrow fat on accuracy of quantitative CT.

Authors:  C C Glüer; H K Genant
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Rupich; R Pacifici; M Griffin; I Vered; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Risk factors for hip fractures. A review.

Authors:  J B Lauritzen; P A McNair; B Lund
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  1993-09

8.  Reproductive factors as predictors of bone density and fractures in women at the age of 70.

Authors:  C Johansson; D Mellström; I Milsom
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Fracture prevalence and bone mineral mass in osteoporosis measured with computed tomography and dual energy photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J A Raymakers; O Hoekstra; J van Putten; H Kerkhoff; S A Duursma
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; R Pommet; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  4 in total

1.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Lateral bone density measurements in osteoarthritis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D J Peacock; P Egger; P Taylor; M I Cawley; C Cooper
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Assessment of the risk of low bone mineral density in premenopausal Japanese female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Yu Mori; Kazuyoshi Baba; Atsushi Kogure; Takuya Izumiyama; Michiharu Matsuda; Naoko Mori; Tomonori Ishii; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 4.  Vertebral Imaging in the Diagnosis of Osteoporosis: a Clinician's Perspective.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.163

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.