Literature DB >> 33150541

Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.

Tim Brochier1,2, François Guérit3, John M Deeks3, Charlotte Garcia3, Manohar Bance4, Robert P Carlyon3.   

Abstract

Variations in neural health along the cochlea can degrade the spectral and temporal representation of sounds conveyed by cochlear implants (CIs). We evaluated and compared one electrophysiological measure and two behavioural measures that have been proposed as estimates of neural health patterns, in order to explore the extent to which the different measures provide converging and consistent neural health estimates. All measures were obtained from the same 11 users of the Cochlear Corporation CI. The two behavioural measures were multipulse integration (MPI) and the polarity effect (PE), both measured on each of seven electrodes per subject. MPI was measured as the difference between thresholds at 80 pps and 1000 pps, and PE as the difference in thresholds between cathodic- and anodic-centred quadraphasic (QP) 80-pps pulse trains. It has been proposed that good neural health corresponds to a large MPI and to a large negative PE (lower thresholds for cathodic than anodic pulses). The electrophysiological measure was the effect of interphase gap (IPG) on the offset of the ECAP amplitude growth function (AGF), which has been correlated with spiral ganglion neuron density in guinea pigs. This 'IPG offset' was obtained on the same subset of electrodes used for the behavioural measures. Despite high test-retest reliability, there were no significant correlations between the neural health estimates for either within-subject comparisons across the electrode array, or between-subject comparisons of the means. A phenomenological model of a population of spiral ganglion neurons was then used to investigate physiological mechanisms that might underlie the different neural health estimates. The combined experimental and modelling results provide evidence that PE, MPI and IPG offset may reflect different characteristics of the electrode-neural interface.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ECAP; cochlear implants; computational modelling; inter-phase gap; multi-pulse integration; neural health; neural survival; polarity effect; psychophysics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150541      PMCID: PMC7822986          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00773-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  68 in total

1.  Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber.

Authors:  C A Miller; P J Abbas; B K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-09

2.  Auditory response to intracochlear electric stimuli following furosemide treatment.

Authors:  Ning Hu; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fuh-Cherng Jeng; Bruce A Abkes; John M Nichols
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Astrid van Wieringen; John M Deeks; Christopher J Long; Johannes Lyzenga; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Timothy A Holden; Teresa A Zwolan; H Alexander Arts; Jill B Firszt; Christopher J Buswinka; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-27

7.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; S Hatsushika; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  The cochlear nerve in various forms of deafness.

Authors:  J Ylikoski; S Savolainen
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes.

Authors:  F Rattay; P Lutter; H Felix
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Wiebke Konerding; Julie G Arenberg; Andrej Kral; Peter Baumhoff
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  7 in total

1.  Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Heval Benav; Sjaak F L Klis; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

2.  Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan W Archer-Boyd; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Florian Langner; Julie G Arenberg; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

Review 6.  The Panoramic ECAP Method: Estimating Patient-Specific Patterns of Current Spread and Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Charlotte Garcia; Tobias Goehring; Stefano Cosentino; Richard E Turner; John M Deeks; Tim Brochier; Taren Rughooputh; Manohar Bance; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-04-23

7.  Interpreting the Effect of Stimulus Parameters on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and on Neural Health Estimates.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Colette M McKay; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.