| Literature DB >> 33138277 |
Anca Liliana Cismaru1,2, Deborah Rudin3,4, Luisa Ibañez5, Evangelia Liakoni6,7, Nicolas Bonadies8, Reinhold Kreutz9, Alfonso Carvajal10, Maria Isabel Lucena11, Javier Martin12, Esther Sancho Ponce13, Mariam Molokhia14, Niclas Eriksson15, Stephan Krähenbühl3, Carlo R Largiadèr1, Manuel Haschke6,7, Pär Hallberg16, Mia Wadelius16, Ursula Amstutz1.
Abstract
Agranulocytosis is a rare yet severe idiosyncratic adverse drug reaction to metamizole, an analgesic widely used in countries such as Switzerland and Germany. Notably, an underlying mechanism has not yet been fully elucidated and no predictive factors are known to identify at-risk patients. With the aim to identify genetic susceptibility variants to metamizole-induced agranulocytosis (MIA) and neutropenia (MIN), we conducted a retrospective multi-center collaboration including cases and controls from three European populations. Association analyses were performed using genome-wide genotyping data from a Swiss cohort (45 cases, 191 controls) followed by replication in two independent European cohorts (41 cases, 273 controls) and a joint discovery meta-analysis. No genome-wide significant associations (p < 1 × 10-7) were observed in the Swiss cohort or in the joint meta-analysis, and no candidate genes suggesting an immune-mediated mechanism were identified. In the joint meta-analysis of MIA cases across all cohorts, two candidate loci on chromosome 9 were identified, rs55898176 (OR = 4.01, 95%CI: 2.41-6.68, p = 1.01 × 10-7) and rs4427239 (OR = 5.47, 95%CI: 2.81-10.65, p = 5.75 × 10-7), of which the latter is located in the SVEP1 gene previously implicated in hematopoiesis. This first genome-wide association study for MIA identified suggestive associations with biological plausibility that may be used as a stepping-stone for post-GWAS analyses to gain further insight into the mechanism underlying MIA.Entities:
Keywords: dipyrone; drug-induced agranulocytosis; genome-wide association study; metamizole; pharmacogenetics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138277 PMCID: PMC7716224 DOI: 10.3390/genes11111275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.096
Figure 1Study design. Cases and controls were genotyped separately using the indictaed Illumina arrays. MIA/MIN-CH = Swiss cohort, EuDAC-ES = Spanish cohort, EuDAC-DE = German cohort, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphisms, K = 1000, M = 100,000.
Characteristics of cases and controls in the three independent cohorts. Data are N(%) or median (range). a cases, b controls, * latency missing for 3 MIA cases and 1 MIN case. ANC = lowest absolute neutrophil count, BMI = body mass index, NA = not applicable/not available.
| Cohort | MIA/MIN-CH | EuDAC-DE | EuDAC-ES | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | Cases | Controls | |
| ANC < 500/uL | 30 (67) | - | 12 | - | 29 | - |
| Sex, male (%) | 13 (42) | 17 (45) | 4 (33) | 41 (44.5) | 6 (21) | 87 (48) |
| Age, years (%) | ||||||
| <25 | 7 (23) | 1 (3) | 2 (16.6) | NA | 3 (10.3) | NA |
| 25–44 | 11 (35) | 6 (16) | 6 (50) | NA | 6 (21) | NA |
| 45–64 | 10 (32) | 15 (39) | 2 (16.6) | NA | 12 (41.4) | NA |
| 65–74 | 3 (10) | 9 (24) | 2 (16.6) | NA | 5 (17) | NA |
| >74 | - | 7 (18) | - | NA | 3 (10.3) | NA |
| BMI, median (range) | 24 (19–47) | 28 (16–39) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Latency time * a/treatment duration b, days | 17 (1–204) | 25 (1–5297) | 33.5 (4–9855) | NA | 11.5 (1–235) | NA |
Figure 2Manhattan plot of genome-wide association analyses in the MIA/MIN-CH cohort. Results from 304,704 genotyped SNPs after quality control are shown, adjusted by multidimensional scaling (MDS) dimensions 1–4: (a) Analysis of all 45 cases (MIA and MIN) versus 191 controls (tolerant and unexposed combined). The top SNP was rs191786, located in an intergenic region nearest to the TENT5A gene on chromosome 6; (b) Analysis of 30 MIA cases versus 191 tolerant/unexposed controls. The top SNP was rs9366076, located in an intergenic region nearest to the RNASET2 gene on chromosome 6. The red line shows the threshold for genome-wide significance of 1 × 10−7.
Figure 3Manhattan plot of GWAS meta-analyses in the three independent cohorts (MIA/MIN-CH, EuDAC-ES and EuDAC-DE). Results from approximately 7 million SNPs after imputation and quality control are shown, adjusted by multidimensional scaling (MDS) dimensions 1–4 and sex (only for EuDAC-ES). The red line shows the threshold for genome-wide significance of 1 × 10−7. (a) Analysis of all 86 cases (MIA and MIN) versus 464 controls (tolerant and unexposed). The top SNP was rs11583606, located in an intron of the TGFBR3 gene on chromosome 1. (b) Analysis of 71 agranulocytosis cases (MIA) versus 464 controls (tolerant and unexposed). The top SNP was rs55898176, located in an intergenic region nearest to the CAAP1 gene on chromosome 9.
Top associations of the GWAS meta-analysis with MIA/MIN in all cases versus controls in the three independent European cohorts. Top GWAS meta-analysis results based on approximately 7 million SNPs after imputation in 83 MIA/MIN cases vs. all 464 controls (tolerant and unexposed). All results were adjusted for four genetic multidimensional scaling (MDS) components and sex (only for EuDAC-ES). Chromosomal location is according to the Genome Reference Consortium human assembly GRCh37. CHR = chromosome, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, BP = base pair, MAF = minor allele frequency, OR [95%] = odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, HetISq = I2 statistic which measures heterogeneity on a scale of 0–100%.
| CHR | SNP | Alleles (Minor/Major) | BP | MAF Cases | MAF Controls | OR [95%] |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | rs11583606 | T/C | 92349247 | 0.10| 014| 0.083 | 0.023| 0.025| 0.027 | 7.0 [3.37–14.5] | 1.72 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 1 | rs149072800 | C/T | 92445720 | 0.089| 0.12| 0.083 | 0.020| 0.019| 0.022 | 7.81 [3.57–17.1] | 2.66 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 1 | rs146378328 | G/A | 92528047 | 0.089| 0.10| 0.083 | 0.018| 0.019| 0.021 | 8.31 [3.69–18.7] | 2.93 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 1 | rs75499485 | G/A | 92486274 | 0.089| 0.10| 0.083 | 0.020| 0.019| 0.021 | 7.96 [3.56–17.8] | 4.23 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 12 | rs112917452 | C/A | 15638858 | 0.067| 0.15| 0.042 | 0.016| 0.027| 0.016 | 7.30 [3.29–16.20] | 9.92 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 12 | rs118135416 | A/G | 15638914 | 0.067| 0.15| 0.042 | 0.016| 0.027| 0.016 | 7.30 [3.29–16.20] | 9.92 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 12 | rs7135120 | T/C | 15626920 | 0.067| 0.15| 0.042 | 0.016| 0.027| 0.016 | 7.30 [3.29–16.20] | 9.92 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 12 | rs143843248 | T/C | 15633812 | 0.067| 0.15| 0.041 | 0.016| 0.027| 0.016 | 7.30 [3.29–16.20] | 9.92 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 13 | rs73163933 | A/G | 33968020 | 0.12| 0.086| 0.21 | 0.036| 0.027| 0.054 | 5.36 [2.73–10.5] | 1.01 × 10−6 |
| 0 |
| 1 | rs78201766 | G/A | 92379078 | 0.10| 0.14| 0.083 | 0.026| 0.030| 0.027 | 5.65 [2.81–11.34] | 1.12 × 10−6 |
| 0 |
Top associations of the GWAS meta-analysis in MIA cases versus controls in the three independent European cohorts. Top GWAS meta-analysis results based on approximately 7 million SNPs after imputation in 71 MIA cases vs. all 464 controls (tolerant and unexposed). All results were adjusted for four genetic multidimensional scaling (MDS) components and sex (only for EuDAC-ES). Chromosomal location is according to the Genome Reference Consortium human assembly GRCh37. CHR = chromosome, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, BP = base pair, MAF = minor allele frequency, OR [95%] = odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, HetISq = I2 statistic which measures heterogeneity on scale of 0–100%.
| CHR | SNP | Alleles (Minor/Major) | BP | MAF Cases | MAF Controls | OR [95%] |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | rs55898176 | T/C | 26715294 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.12| 0.081 | 4.01 [2.41–6.68] | 1.01 × 10−7 | - | 21.7 |
| 9 | rs112223975 | C/G | 26715828 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.12| 0.081 | 3.89 [2.34–6.48] | 1.50 × 10−7 | - | 28.6 |
| 9 | rs11790418 | G/A | 26713012 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.12| 0.098 | 3.81 [2.29–6.35] | 2.54 × 10−7 | - | 29.3 |
| 9 | rs1434481 | G/C | 26711134 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.11| 0.098 | 3.81 [2.29–6.35] | 2.54 × 10−7 | - | 29.3 |
| 9 | rs28475568 | G/C | 26709933 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.11| 0.098 | 3.81 [2.29–6.35] | 2.54 × 10−7 | - | 29.3 |
| 9 | rs28649995 | A/G | 26709912 | 0.27| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.065| 0.11| 0.098 | 3.81 [2.29–6.35] | 2.54 × 10−7 | - | 14.6 |
| 9 | rs56285046 | A/G | 26714950 | 0.28| 0.24| 0.25 | 0.073| 0.12| 0.092 | 3.70 [2.27–6.05] | 3.25 × 10−7 | - | 0 |
| 9 | rs77949268 | A/G | 26738366 | 0.27| 0.26| 0.25 | 0.078| 0.12| 0.10 | 3.59 [2.20–5.87] | 3.74 × 10−7 | - | 0 |
| 9 | rs4427239 | A/G | 113270601 | 0.16| 0.15| 0.041 | 0.029| 0.041| 0.016 | 5.47 [2.81–10.65] | 5.75 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
| 9 | rs10759436 | C/T | 113268650 | 0.15| 0.15| 0.041 | 0.029| 0.041| 0.016 | 5.81 [2.92–11.54] | 8.13 × 10−7 |
| 0 |
Figure 4Regional association plots for regions around rs55898176 and rs4427239. Plots were produced in Locus Zoom and show the most strongly associated independent SNPs: rs55898176 (a) and rs4427239 (b) from the GWAS meta-analyses of the 71 MIA cases versus 464 controls (tolerant and unexposed). Different colors represent the strength of the LD of each SNP with the most significant SNP represented by a diamond.