Literature DB >> 11315092

Genomic control for association studies.

B Devlin1, K Roeder.   

Abstract

A dense set of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) covering the genome and an efficient method to assess SNP genotypes are expected to be available in the near future. An outstanding question is how to use these technologies efficiently to identify genes affecting liability to complex disorders. To achieve this goal, we propose a statistical method that has several optimal properties: It can be used with case control data and yet, like family-based designs, controls for population heterogeneity; it is insensitive to the usual violations of model assumptions, such as cases failing to be strictly independent; and, by using Bayesian outlier methods, it circumvents the need for Bonferroni correction for multiple tests, leading to better performance in many settings while still constraining risk for false positives. The performance of our genomic control method is quite good for plausible effects of liability genes, which bodes well for future genetic analyses of complex disorders.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11315092     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  1407 in total

1.  Population admixture: detection by Hardy-Weinberg test and its quantitative effects on linkage-disequilibrium methods for localizing genes underlying complex traits.

Authors:  H W Deng; W M Chen; R R Recker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic analysis of case/control data using estimated haplotype frequencies: application to APOE locus variation and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D Fallin; A Cohen; L Essioux; I Chumakov; M Blumenfeld; D Cohen; N J Schork
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Complexity and power in case-control association studies.

Authors:  J A Longmate
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-04-04       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Association mapping in structured populations.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; N A Rosenberg; P Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-26       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  The power of genomic control.

Authors:  S A Bacanu; B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-08       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model.

Authors:  G A Satten; W D Flanders; Q Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Charles M Rowland; David E Tines; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-12-27       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples.

Authors:  S Zhang; H Zhao
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  The importance of genealogy in determining genetic associations with complex traits.

Authors:  D L Newman; M Abney; M S McPeek; C Ober; N J Cox
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Evaluation of candidate genes in case-control studies: a statistical method to account for related subjects.

Authors:  S L Slager; D J Schaid
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.