| Literature DB >> 33092544 |
Mikhail Ponomarenko1,2, Ekaterina Sharypova3, Irina Drachkova3, Irina Chadaeva3, Olga Arkova4, Olga Podkolodnaya3, Petr Ponomarenko3, Nikolay Kolchanov3, Ludmila Savinkova3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin is a tetramer consisting of two α-chains and two β-chains of globin. Hereditary aberrations in the synthesis of one of the globin chains are at the root of thalassemia, one of the most prevalent monogenic diseases worldwide. In humans, in addition to α- and β-globins, embryonic zeta-globin and fetal γ-globin are expressed. Immediately after birth, the expression of fetal Aγ- and Gγ-globin ceases, and then adult β-globin is mostly expressed. It has been shown that in addition to erythroid cells, hemoglobin is widely expressed in nonerythroid cells including neurons of the cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum in rodents; embryonic and adult brain neurons in mice; and mesencephalic dopaminergic brain cells in humans, mice, and rats. Lately, there is growing evidence that different forms of anemia (changes in the number and quality of blood cells) may be involved in (or may accompany) the pathogenesis of various cognitive and mental disorders, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases, depression of various severity levels, bipolar disorders, and schizophrenia. Higher hemoglobin concentrations in the blood may lead to hyperviscosity, hypovolemia, and lung diseases, which may cause brain hypoxia and anomalies of brain function, which may also result in cognitive deficits.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive disorder; Erythropoiesis; In silico prediction; SNP marker; TATA-binding protein; TBP/TATA affinity, kinetics of TBP-TATA binding in vitro
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33092544 PMCID: PMC7579878 DOI: 10.1186/s12881-020-01106-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Predictions of the influence of SNPs in the promoters of the hemoglobin subunit genes on TBP–TATA affinity, as performed by SNP-TATA-Z-tester [31]
| Gene | Alleles, WT or mut | DNA sequence, TATA-like box; 5′-3′ | Prognosis, −ln |
|---|---|---|---|
WT rs63750400:G rs281864525:T rs34598529:G rs33980857:A rs33980857:C rs33980857:G rs33981098:C rs33981098:A rs34500389:T rs34500389:A rs33931746:C | cagggctgggcataaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcataaaaGtcagggcagag cagggctgggcataaaTctcagggcagag cagggctgggcatGaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcaAaaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcaCaaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcaGaaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcCtaaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcGtaaaattcagggcagag cagggctgggTataaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggActaaaactcagggcagag cagggctgggcataCaactcagggcagag | 19.20 19.12 19.169 17.849 17.701 18.172 17.673 18.553 18.062 20.175 18.635 18.341 | |
WT rs35518301:G | ggaccagcacaaaaggcagggcagag ggaccagcacGaaaggcagggcagag | 19.29 18.65 | |
WT rs113180943:T rs1035033590:C | cagctccctgtaataaggggaccctg cagctccctgtaTtaaggggaccctg cagctccctgtaataaggCgaccctg | 20,76 19,28 20,773 | |
WT rs559282746:G | ggagggtggggcccctatctctcct ggagggtggggcGcctatctctcct | 17.611 17.605 | |
WT rs571582665:T | gcgccccaagcataaacctggcgcgc gcgccccaagcataaacTtggcgcgc | 18.36 18.62 | |
WT rs573241527:G | agggtgcttccttttattcttcatcc agggtgcttccttttCttcttcatcc | 19.06 17.54 | |
WT rs905730148:A rs937192507:C | ggtgcccggaggctctataaggaggc ggtgcccggagAccctataaggaggc ggtgcccggaggcccCataaggaggc | 19.13 19.23 19.95 | |
WT rs768296486:A rs1036491581:G rs150246840:C | aggcaaaaagagagcttgtgtagagc aggcaaaaagagagAttgtgtagagc aggcaaaaagagagaGtgtgtagagc aggcaaaaagagaggttgtgtagCgc | 18.31 18.16 18.01 18.16 |
Notes: Ancestral (WT) and minor (mut) alleles; KD, dissociation constant of the TBP–DNA complex [13]; Genes: HBB, β-globin; HBB_2, β-globin promoter 2; HBZ zeta-globin; HBZ_3 zeta-globin promoter 3; HBA1, α1-globin; HBG1 Aγ globin; HBM Hemoglobin subunit μ; and HBE1 ε-globin
Predictions regarding the influence of SNPs in the promoters of erythroid genes (except the hemoglobin subunit genes) on TBP–TATA affinity, as performed by SNP-TATA-Z-tester [31]
| Gene | Alleles: WT or mut | DNA sequence, TATA-like box; 5′-3′ | Prognosis, −ln |
|---|---|---|---|
WT rs564394089:A rs1046254329:A rs905035347:T | ctcccgctgtatattaaggcgccggc ctacAgctgtatattaaggcgccggc ctaccgctAtatattaaggcgccggc ctaccgctatatattaaggTgccggc | 20.11 20.23 20.40 20.11 | |
WT rs540950375:T rs991064314:T | ggaatgggcagcttatgtacaggggg ggaatgggcaTcttatgtacaggggg ggaatgggTagcttatgtacaggggg | 19.81 19.70 19.82 | |
WT rs557418569:G rs538698304:C | cttgggcatttttatagaaacttact cttgggcGtttttatagaaacttact cttgggcattttCatagaaacttact | 20.22 20.16 19.61 | |
WT rs762972656:T | aggactccagcgaaattacagggaat aggactccaTcgaaattacagggaat | 17.98 17.92 | |
WT rs1006576690:T rs971717705:C rs567946217:A rs567946217:C | cgtagcagacaaaaatagatgacgtg cgtagcagacaaaTatagatgacgtg cgtagcagacaaaaaCagatgacgtg cgtagcagacaaaaataAatgacgtg cgtagcagacaaaaataCatgacgtg | 18.24 19.39 18.11 19.33 18.51 | |
WT rs3967038:C rs3967038:A | gcctactagctgttatcttccaggcc gcctacCagctgttatcttccaggcc gcctacAagctgttatcttccaggcc | 18.26 18.30 18.23 | |
WT rs970970552:A rs911469201:A rs989175270:G | cattggggagttttccctgcactcct cattAgggagttttccctgcactcct cattggggagttttccctAcactcct cattggggagttttccctgGactcct | 16.97 17.83 17.13 17.27 | |
WT rs946240545:G rs774081749:G rs895690311:G | tcgcgagatttaatggcgagtcacag tcgcgagGtttaatggcgagtcacag tcgcgagattGaatggcgagtcacag tcgcgagatttaatggcgGgtcacag | 18.45 18.34 17.76 18.18 |
Notes: See “Notes” under Table 1. Genes: ALAS1 Aminolevulinate synthase 1; CA1 Carbonic anhydrase 1; CA1_2 Carbonic anhydrase promoter 2; HOXB2 Homeobox B2; EPOR Erythropoietin receptor; GYPB Glycophorin B; GYPC Glycophorin C; and EDRF1 Erythroid differentiation regulatory factor 1
Fig. 1Candidate SNP marker rs34500389 predicted by this work to be associated with mental and cognitive disorders. Legend: a Unannotated SNPs (analyzed in this study) in the 100 bp region [where all known TBP-binding sites (boxed) are located; double-headed arrow, ↔] of the human HBB gene promoter were examined using the UCSC Genome Browser [38]. Dotted-and-dashed arrow: SNP rs34500389 under study within the reference human genome sequence and its description within database dbSNP [39], which is publicly available, as indicated by the “laptop” icon. b The description of rs34500389 within database dbSNP [39]. c The results from our Web service SNP_TATA_Z-tester [31] for SNP rs34500389 being analyzed. Dash-and-dot arrows: significance estimates for the alteration of the HBB level in patients with the minor allele (text box “2nd promoter”) relative to the norm (text box “1st promoter”) expressed as a Z-score using the R package [43]. Circles indicate the ancestral and minor alleles of the SNP marker in question within the text boxes “1st promoter” and “2nd promoter,” respectively
Kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of TBP–TATA interactions
| Gene | ODN | Alleles: | Allele | Sequences (5′ – 3′ strands), | Prediction | Experiments | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -ln | δ | -ln | δ | t1/2, min | ||||||||
1 2 | WT rs34500389:T | -32c > T | agggctgggcataaaagtcagggcag agggctggg | 19.20 20.18 | + 0.98 | 16.81 17.26 | + 0.45 | 50 ± 7 32 ± 3 | (1.4 ± 0.1)*104 2.1 ± 0.1*104 | (7.1 ± 0.7)*10−4 (6.6 ± 0,5)*10− 4 | 16 ± 2 17 ± 2 | |
3 4 | WT rs113180943:A | -29 t > A | agctccctgtatataaggggaccctg agctccctgta | 20.76 19.28 | −1.48 | 18.93 17.03 | −1.90 | 6 ± 1 40 ± 20 | (4.5 ± 0.4) *104 (2.3 ± 0,2)*103 | 3.0 ± 0.6)*10−4 (1.0 ± 0.4)*10− 4 | 38 ± 4 115 ± 15 | |
| 5 | WT | cacgtcatctatttttgtctgctacg | 18.24 | 15.59 | 170 ± 30 | (2.8 ± 0,3)*103 | (4.6 ± 0.6)*10−4 | 25 ± 3 | ||||
| 6 | rs1006576690:A | -27 t > A | cacgtcatctat | 19.39 | + 1.15 | 18.33 | + 2.74 | 11 ± 3 | (9.3 ± 0,7)*103 | (1.0 ± 0.3)*10−4 | 115 ± 15 | |
| 7 | rs971717705:G | -29a > | cacgtcatct | 18.11 | −0.13 | 15.71 | + 0.12 | 150 ± 30 | (2.4 ± 0,3)*103 | (3.6 ± 0.5)*10−4 | 32 ± 4 | |
| 8 | rs567946217:A | -31c > | cacgt | 19.33 | + 1.09 | 17.68 | + 2.09 | 21 ± 6 | (6.8 ± 0.7)*103 | (1.4 ± 0.4)*10−4 | 82 ± 6 | |
| 9 | rs567946217:G | -31c > | cacgtсat | 18.51 | + 0.27 | 16.34 | + 0.75 | 80 ± 10 | (3.6 ± 0.3)*103 | (3.0 ± 0.5)*10−4 | 38 ± 4 | |
ODN Oligodeoxyribonucleotide; WT Ancestral allele; mut Minor allele; KD Equilibrium dissociation constant, which is presented as mean ± standard deviation; δ, the difference between the affinity of TBP for an ODN with and without the SNP in its TATA box expressed as natural logarithms, δ = −ln (KD,Mut) – [−ln (KD,WT)]; ka and k, association and dissociation rate constants, respectively; t1/2 = ln2/kd, the average half-life of the TBP/ODN complexes; HBB β-globin gene; HBZ Zeta-globin gene; and EPOR Erythropoietin receptor gene
Fig. 2Measuring the kinetics of TBP binding to TATA-containing ODN N2 identical to the HBB promoter in healthy people. Legend: a Dependences of reaction rates on ODN N2 concentrations; b electropherograms from which these curves were derived. TBP concentration was 0.4 nM in all the experiments; the concentrations of a TATA-containing ODN that we used are indicated. TBP–TATA-associated isotherms and ka and kd values were inferred from the electropherograms using GraphPad Prism 5 software
Fig. 3The significant correlations between the in silico predicted and in vitro experimentally measured values. Legend: a TBP–DNA affinity and b the TBP–DNA affinity change caused by the minor allele of the analyzed SNPs with respect to the norm, −ln [KD] and Δln [KD], respectively. Solid and dashed lines denote the linear regression and boundaries of its 95% confidence interval, calculated by means of software package STATISTICA (Statsoft™, USA); arrows pinpoint the ancestral rs34500389:C and minor rs34500389:t alleles of the SNP being studied, an analysis of which is depicted in Fig. 1 as an example of the application of our Web service SNP_TATA_Z-tester [31] in this work; r, τ, γ, and p are coefficients of Pearson’s linear correlation, Spearman’s rank correlation, Kendall’s rank correlation, and Goodman–Kruskal generalized correlation and their p values, respectively