Literature DB >> 30507031

Genetic variants of erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO receptor genes in familial erythrocytosis.

Danijela Vočanec1,2, Tinkara Prijatelj1,2, Nataša Debeljak2, Tanja Kunej1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Erythrocytosis is characterized by the expansion of erythrocyte compartment including elevated red blood cell number, hematocrit, and hemoglobin content. Familial erythrocytosis (FE) is a congenital disorder with different genetic background. Type 1 FE is primary FE caused by mutation in erythropoietin receptor gene (EPOR). Type 2-5 FE are secondary FEs caused by mutations of genes involved in oxygen sensing pathway important for erythropoietin (EPO) regulation. In the present study, we summarized associations between EPOR and EPO gene variations with development of FE and searched for genetic variants located within regulatory regions.
METHODS: Publications reporting EPOR and EPO sequence variants associated with FE or clinical features of erythrocytosis were retrieved from PubMed and WoS. In silico, sequence reanalysis was performed using Ensembl genomic browser, release 89 to screen for variants located within regulatory regions.
RESULTS: To date, 28 variants of the EPOR and seven variants of the EPO gene have been associated with erythrocytosis or upper hematocrit. Sequence variants were also found to be present within regulatory regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Role of variants in regulatory regions of the EPO gene should be further investigated.
© 2018 The Authors International Journal of Laboratory Hematology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  erythropoietin; erythropoietin receptor; familial erythrocytosis; regulatory regions; sequence variants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30507031      PMCID: PMC7379665          DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


INTRODUCTION

Erythrocytosis comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by the expansion of the erythrocyte compartment in the peripheral blood, clinically reflected by an increased hematocrit, hemoglobin or red blood cell (RBC) number.1 Erythrocytosis is classified as congenital or acquired and its mechanism may be primary or secondary.2, 3, 4, 5 Primary erythrocytosis results from a molecular defect in the hematopoietic progenitor cells, leading to cell hypersensitivity to erythropoietin (EPO) and consequently in serum EPO levels below normal. The primary cause of increased RBC number may be polycythemia vera (PV) (acquired) or familial erythrocytosis (FE) (congenital). The mutation of a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene is indicative for PV. The erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) mutation is the indicator for primary FE type 1 (ECYT1), also known as congenital erythrocytosis (CE) or primary congenital familial polycythemia.6, 7 Secondary erythrocytosis results from aberrant regulation of erythropoiesis promoting substances acting on hematopoietic progenitors, mainly EPO.4 Secondary congenital erythrocytosis is characterized by inappropriately normal or high serum EPO levels due to defects in the oxygen sensing pathway (ECYT2‐5) or variants effecting hemoglobin oxygen affinity (ECYT6‐7)8 (OMIM).9 Defects in oxygen sensing pathway can be associated with pathogenic variants in one of the factors regulating EPO production; including von Hippel‐Lindau tumor suppressor (VHL) indicative for ECYT2, egl‐9 family hypoxia‐inducible factor 1 (EGLN1, synonym PHD2) indicative for ECYT3, and endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1, synonym HIF2A) indicative for ECYT4. Recently, the EPO gene was added to the OMIM database as new cause for FE (indicative for ECYT5).9, 10 Glycoprotein hormone EPO is the main regulator of red blood cell production. EPOR dimerization and activation by EPO leads to signaling cascade triggering several genes responsible for proliferation, survival, and differentiation of erythroid progenitor cells, leading to a tight control of RBC production in the bone marrow.11 Hormone EPO and its receptor EPOR can therefore be involved in development of FE. Erythropoietin receptor gene is located on 19p13.2. The 2459 bp long primary transcript variant 1 encodes 508 amino acids (aa) EPOR precursor, resulting in 484 aa long mature receptor. The mature receptor consists of an extracellular, a transmembrane, and a cytoplasmic region. Soluble (EPOR‐S) and truncated (EPOR‐T) isoforms associated with cancer have also been identified.12 Multiple EPOR mutations associated with ECYT1 have been described, lacking a signal termination due to truncation of the inhibitory domain SHP‐1/SOCS‐3. All patients with EPOR mutations display suppressed serum EPO levels, but still produce erythroid colonies due to constitutive receptor activation. EPOR mutations have been found in 15% of all hereditary erythrocytosis cases.13 Erythropoietin gene is located at 7q22.1. Single 1340 bp long splice variant encodes a 193 aa erythropoietin precursor, resulting in 165 aa long mature hormone. EPO production is increased in hypoxia resulting from anemia or decreased cellular oxygen tension. Under normal oxygen tension, HIF‐alfa is hydroxylated by EGLN1 (PHD2) and targeted by VHL for ubiquitin‐mediated degradation, resulting in no EPO production. Under hypoxic conditions, hydroxylase activity is inhibited, therefore EGLN1 proteins are unable to hydroxylate HIF‐alfa allowing it to escape VHL protein recognition and subsequent degradation. HIF‐alfa can therefore form an active transcriptional complex with HIF‐beta, aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator (ARNT). Hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF) complex translocates to nucleus and binds to the hypoxia response element (HRE) of the target genes and upregulates expression of more than 200 genes, including EPO.2 Among members of HIF‐alfa gene family, EPAS1 (HIF2A) is involved in regulation of EPO production.14 Tissue‐specific expression of EPO gene in adult kidneys or fetal livers is dependent on far upstream cis elements and an enhancer element downstream from the poly‐adenylation signal.2 EPO gene expression is also regulated via stimulatory hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A), inhibitory GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2), and NF‐kappa‐B (NFKB).15, 16, 17 The motif 5′‐RCGTG‐3′ has been reported as the core sequence for a HIF binding site.14, 16, 18, 19 One of the main obstacles in the research field presents the fact that terminology regarding genetic variants is heterogeneous and dispersed across publications and databases. Additionally, identification of regulatory regions was performed on various previous genomic assemblies and needs to be updated according to the genomic locations from latest genomic browsers. The main aim of the present study was therefore to: (a) summarize the literature and databases for associations between EPOR and EPO genes and familial erythrocytosis or its clinical signs and (b) to perform in silico sequence reanalysis of the EPO gene to identify variants overlapping regulatory sites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature databases (PubMed and Web of Science; WoS) were screened for gene variations in EPO and EPOR genes in association with FE and its clinical characteristics: increased RBC mass, elevated hemoglobin, and hematocrit. The literature was retrieved using the keywords such as erythropoietin, erythropoietin receptor, mutations, polymorphism, erythrocytosis, polycythemia, hematocrit, and elevated red blood cell number. The time span of the literature search was from 1/1993 to 4/2018. Nucleotide sequence, genomic coordinates, and variants were extracted from the Ensembl, release 89.20 Obtained data were complemented with additional relevant genomic information. Reference SNP ID number (rs ID) if available, synonyms and clinical data were obtained from: The Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (dbSNP),21 The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD),22 www.erythrocytosis.org and Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD), release 3.0.23 Gene names were unified according to the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) database.24 Collected genomic data were organized and unified according to the human genome variation society (HGVS) recommendations.25 Locations of regulatory regions were extracted from the published literature and compared with genomic location of sequence variants deposited in the Ensembl browser.

RESULTS

The review revealed that 25 genetic variants of the exon 8 of EPOR gene associated with FE are deposited in the LOVD database. Literature review revealed three additional variants reported in1, 26, 27 (Table 1). Mutations result in premature termination and, consequently, these mutant receptors lack portions of the C‐terminal EPOR cytoplasmic domain responsible for negative regulation.
Table 1

Genetic variants of the EPOR gene causing truncation of EPOR protein in familial erythrocytosis

dbSNP HGVS nameVar_pub_asLocation of the variant in the EPOR geneGeographic origin/ethnic originNumber of patients reportedReferenceRemarks

c.1252_1255del

p.Gly418Profs*34

g.5938_5941delExon 8DenmarkOne family, four affected members

Petersen et al26

PMID: 15142125

58 aa truncation confirmed in three members

c.1273G>T

p.Glu425*

G5959TExon 8naOne family, four affected members

Kralovics and Prchal1

PMID: 11559951

84 aa truncation

c.1362C>G

p.Tyr454*

/Exon 8FranceOne patient (30‐y‐old female)

Chauveau et al27

PMID: 26010769

55 aa truncation, shortest known truncation

EPOR, erythropoietin receptor; Var_pub_as, variant as reported originally; listed only when different from Variant/DNA.

Genetic variants of the EPOR gene causing truncation of EPOR protein in familial erythrocytosis c.1252_1255del p.Gly418Profs*34 Petersen et al26 PMID: 15142125 c.1273G>T p.Glu425* Kralovics and Prchal1 PMID: 11559951 c.1362C>G p.Tyr454* Chauveau et al27 PMID: 26010769 EPOR, erythropoietin receptor; Var_pub_as, variant as reported originally; listed only when different from Variant/DNA. Out of 11 tested sequence variants of the EPO gene, seven were associated with erythrocytosis or upper‐limit hematocrit (Table 2).4, 10, 28, 29 Four tested sequence variants were not associated with FE or clinical signs.19, 28 The first pathogenic variant of the EPO gene is located in the 5′ UTR region and it was reported by the WGS500 project. It was identified in two independent families with erythrocytosis and is sufficiently substantiated by segregation data to assume its disease causing effect, most probably due to increased EPO regulation.29 Three variants are located within exons 2 and 4 in patients with FE4; however, the causative for FE needs to be confirmed. Pathogenic variant c.32delG located in exon 2 causative for FE was recently identified. This pathogenic variant introduces a frameshift in exon 2 and interrupts EPO mRNA translation from primary transcript variant 1. Increased transcription of EPO mRNA is initiated from an alternative promoter located in intron 1.10 Two sequence variants located within regulatory regions; rs1617640 and rs551238 were identified in blood donors with significantly increased hematocrit,28 however their causative for FE needs to be reviewed.
Table 2

Genetic variants of the EPO gene associated with erythrocytosis or hematocrit level

dbSNP HGVS name (reference SNP ID number, if available)Var_pub_asLocation of the variant in the EPO geneGeographic origin/ethnic originNumber of patients reportedReferenceRemarks
NM_000799.2:c.‐1306C>A (rs1617640)G>TUpstreamJordan298 healthy male blood donors; divided into: Ht level greater or equal to 48 (181), and Ht between 42% and 47.5% (117)

Khabour et al28

PMID: 23142128

G allele was found at significant higher frequency among upper‐Ht group; unconfirmed
NM_000799.2:c.‐136G>A/5′UTRUnited Kingdom (Great Britain)One family, three affected members and one family, five affected members

Taylor29

PMID: 25985138

Co‐segregated with the disease in two independent families
NM_000799.2:c.32delG/exon 2NorwayOne family, nine affected members

Zmajkovic et al10

PMID: 29514032

Frameshift in exon 2, excess production of EPO from alternative promoter located in intron 1
NM_000799.2:c.19delC, p.P7fs/exon 2/Female with affected father and parental grandmother.

Camps et al4

PMID: 27651169

Identified as novel erythrocytosis‐associated gene variant in WGS500 and gene panel sequencing project; unconfirmed.
NM_000799.2:c.250G>C, p.G84R (rs137953994)/exon 4/One male patient
NM_000799.2:c.296A>G, p.E99G/exon 4/Two male patients
NM_000799.2:c.*772G>T (rs551238)G3544T3′UTR enhancerJordan298 healthy male blood donors; divided into: Ht level greater or equal to 48 (181), and Ht between 42% and 47.5% (117)

Khabour et al28

PMID: 23142128

G allele was found at significant higher frequency among upper‐Ht group; unconfirmed

EPO, erythropoietin; Hb, hemoglobin; HRE, hypoxia response element in 3′ UTR enhancer; Ht, hematocrit; Var_pub_as, variant as reported originally; listed only when different from Variant/DNA.

Genetic variants of the EPO gene associated with erythrocytosis or hematocrit level Khabour et al28 PMID: 23142128 Taylor29 PMID: 25985138 Zmajkovic et al10 PMID: 29514032 Camps et al4 PMID: 27651169 Khabour et al28 PMID: 23142128 EPO, erythropoietin; Hb, hemoglobin; HRE, hypoxia response element in 3′ UTR enhancer; Ht, hematocrit; Var_pub_as, variant as reported originally; listed only when different from Variant/DNA. We also analyzed if retrieved EPO gene sequence variants are located within regulatory regions. Genetic locations of binding regions for EPAS1 (HIF2A), ARNT (HIF1B), and HNF4A binding sites were retrieved from publications16, 18, 19 and mapped to the sequence according to the latest genome assembly. Downstream from the EPAS1 and ARNT binding site (HIF binding site, HBS), the EPO 3′ enhancer contains a series of CA repeats (HIF ancillary sequence, HAS) and two tandem consensus steroid hormone response elements 5′—YGACCY—3′ separated by 2 bp, binding sites for HNF4A (nuclear receptor half site, DR‐2). The analysis revealed that seven variants associated with erythrocytosis or hematocrit level (Table 2) are not located within regulatory regions (Figure 1). We additionally screened Ensembl database and retrieved two SNPs located within regulatory regions (rs796952255 and rs539229161; Figure 1). These two SNPs have unknown function and were also not yet tested in association with FE.
Figure 1

Nucleotide sequence of the EPO gene 3′ enhancer, with marked sequence variants and regulatory regions. EPO, erythropoietin HAS, HIF ancillary sequence; HBS, HIF binding site; DR‐2, nuclear receptor half site

Nucleotide sequence of the EPO gene 3′ enhancer, with marked sequence variants and regulatory regions. EPO, erythropoietin HAS, HIF ancillary sequence; HBS, HIF binding site; DR‐2, nuclear receptor half site

DISCUSSION

Most pathogenic genetic variants of EPOR the gene are causative for FE due to truncation of protein cytoplasmic region responsible for receptor negative regulation by SHP‐1 and SOCS‐3 binding to EPOR at 454 aa and 454‐456 aa, respectively.30, 31, 32 For example, variant c.1362C>G at 454 aa causes deletion of the last 55 aa,27 while the variant rs281860299 at 382 aa results in deletion of the last 127 aa.33 In contrast, EPO variants are spread all over the gene and several disease causing mechanisms seem to be involved. EPO variant c.‐136G>A is pathogenic due to increased EPO regulation29 and variant c.32delG due increased EPO production from alternative promoter.10 Variants in promoter and enhancer regions of EPO gene have been associated with elevated hematocrit suggesting involvement in FE, since both regulatory regions have an important role in EPO expression. Variant rs1617640 and rs551238 of EPO gene have also been associated with diabetic retinopathy34 and hematopoietic disorder myelodysplastic syndrome.35 Identification of variants within EPO regulatory regions is of interest since they could contain variants that constitutively activate the EPO gene. Sequence analysis of the 3′HRE region revealed four variants; however, none of which affected the HIF‐1‐binding site, although one was present within HNF‐4 consensus region.19 Screening of the Ensembl database revealed two variants with unknown function located within regulatory regions. Variant rs796952255 is located in HBS, also termed as hypoxia response element (HRE). Variants located within HRE were previously termed as HRE‐SNPs.36 Additionally, variant rs539229161 is located within HNF4A binding region (DR‐2). In conclusion, sequence variants of the EPO gene show potential for further functional analyses based on their location within previously reported regulatory regions, which might enable generating more targeted hypotheses for testing in the future and enable more efficient biomarker development.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

DV and TP preformed analysis of the literature and regulatory sites and drafted the paper, ND and TK designed the study and edited the final version of the manuscript.
  35 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Regulation of erythropoietin production.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jelkmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A new point mutation in EPOR inducing a short deletion in congenital erythrocytosis.

Authors:  Aurélie Chauveau; Damien Luque Paz; Lydie Lecucq; Gérald Le Gac; Cédric Le Maréchal; Paul Gueguen; Christian Berthou; Valérie Ugo
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  HGVS Recommendations for the Description of Sequence Variants: 2016 Update.

Authors:  Johan T den Dunnen; Raymond Dalgleish; Donna R Maglott; Reece K Hart; Marc S Greenblatt; Jean McGowan-Jordan; Anne-Francoise Roux; Timothy Smith; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Peter E M Taschner
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Genetic heterogeneity of primary familial and congenital polycythemia.

Authors:  R Kralovics; J T Prchal
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.047

6.  Association between polymorphisms in erythropoietin gene and upper limit haematocrit levels among regular blood donors.

Authors:  O F Khabour; M A Bani-Ahmad; N M Hammash
Journal:  Transfus Clin Biol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 1.406

7.  Negative regulation of the erythropoietin gene expression by the GATA transcription factors.

Authors:  S Imagawa; M Yamamoto; Y Miura
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 8.  Erythropoietin.

Authors:  H Franklin Bunn
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

9.  Ensembl 2016.

Authors:  Andrew Yates; Wasiu Akanni; M Ridwan Amode; Daniel Barrell; Konstantinos Billis; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Carla Cummins; Peter Clapham; Stephen Fitzgerald; Laurent Gil; Carlos García Girón; Leo Gordon; Thibaut Hourlier; Sarah E Hunt; Sophie H Janacek; Nathan Johnson; Thomas Juettemann; Stephen Keenan; Ilias Lavidas; Fergal J Martin; Thomas Maurel; William McLaren; Daniel N Murphy; Rishi Nag; Michael Nuhn; Anne Parker; Mateus Patricio; Miguel Pignatelli; Matthew Rahtz; Harpreet Singh Riat; Daniel Sheppard; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Alessandro Vullo; Steven P Wilder; Amonida Zadissa; Ewan Birney; Jennifer Harrow; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Giulietta Spudich; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Bronwen L Aken; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genenames.org: the HGNC and VGNC resources in 2017.

Authors:  Bethan Yates; Bryony Braschi; Kristian A Gray; Ruth L Seal; Susan Tweedie; Elspeth A Bruford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-30       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  10 in total

1.  Discrepancy in the degree of polycythemia in a family with a novel nonsense EPOR mutation.

Authors:  Chitsanupong Ratarat; Chupong Ittiwut; Rungrote Natesirinilkul; Lalita Sathitsamitpong; Kanda Fanhchaksai; Pimlak Charoenkwan; Kanya Suphapeetiporn; Vorasuk Shotelersuk
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 2.  Molecular Pathways Involved in the Development of Congenital Erythrocytosis.

Authors:  Jana Tomc; Nataša Debeljak
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 3.  Erythrocytosis: genes and pathways involved in disease development.

Authors:  Jernej Gašperšič; Aleša Kristan; Tanja Kunej; Irena Preložnik Zupan; Nataša Debeljak
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Genetic variants of erythropoietin (EPO) and EPO receptor genes in familial erythrocytosis.

Authors:  Danijela Vočanec; Tinkara Prijatelj; Nataša Debeljak; Tanja Kunej
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  [A case of familial erythrocytosis type 2 caused by VHL gene mutation].

Authors:  W Zhang; S Bao; L J Jiang; Y P Ma
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-14

6.  Genetic analysis of 39 erythrocytosis and hereditary hemochromatosis-associated genes in the Slovenian family with idiopathic erythrocytosis.

Authors:  Aleša Kristan; Jernej Gašperšič; Tadeja Režen; Tanja Kunej; Rok Količ; Andrej Vuga; Martina Fink; Špela Žula; Saša Anžej Doma; Irena Preložnik Zupan; Tadej Pajič; Helena Podgornik; Nataša Debeljak
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 7.  JAK2 unmutated erythrocytosis: current diagnostic approach and therapeutic views.

Authors:  Naseema Gangat; Natasha Szuber; Animesh Pardanani; Ayalew Tefferi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 8.  Hypoxia Pathway Proteins are Master Regulators of Erythropoiesis.

Authors:  Deepika Watts; Diana Gaete; Diego Rodriguez; David Hoogewijs; Martina Rauner; Sundary Sormendi; Ben Wielockx
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Unannotated single nucleotide polymorphisms in the TATA box of erythropoiesis genes show in vitro positive involvements in cognitive and mental disorders.

Authors:  Mikhail Ponomarenko; Ekaterina Sharypova; Irina Drachkova; Irina Chadaeva; Olga Arkova; Olga Podkolodnaya; Petr Ponomarenko; Nikolay Kolchanov; Ludmila Savinkova
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.103

10.  NGS Evaluation of a Bernese Cohort of Unexplained Erythrocytosis Patients.

Authors:  Katarzyna Aleksandra Jalowiec; Kristina Vrotniakaite-Bajerciene; Annina Capraru; Tatiana Wojtovicova; Raphael Joncourt; Alicia Rovó; Naomi A Porret
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 4.096

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.