Literature DB >> 33060673

Different types of agricultural land use drive distinct soil bacterial communities.

Shin Ae Lee1, Jeong Myeong Kim2, Yiseul Kim1, Jae-Ho Joa3, Seong-Soo Kang4, Jae-Hyung Ahn1, Mincheol Kim5, Jaekyeong Song1, Hang-Yeon Weon6.   

Abstract

Biogeographic patterns in soil bacterial communities and their responses to environmental variables are well established, yet little is known about how different types of agricultural land use affect bacterial communities at large spatial scales. We report the variation in bacterial community structures in greenhouse, orchard, paddy, and upland soils collected from 853 sites across the Republic of Korea using 16S rRclass="Chemical">NA geclass="Chemical">ne pyrosequeclass="Chemical">nciclass="Chemical">ng aclass="Chemical">nalysis. Bacterial diversities aclass="Chemical">nd commuclass="Chemical">nity structures were sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly differeclass="Chemical">ntiated by agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd-use types. Paddy soils, which are iclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">ntioclass="Chemical">nally flooded for several moclass="Chemical">nths duriclass="Chemical">ng class="Chemical">n class="Species">rice cultivation, had the highest bacterial richness and diversity, with low community variation. Soil chemical properties were dependent on agricultural management practices and correlated with variation in bacterial communities in different types of agricultural land use, while the effects of spatial components were little. Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and Acidobacteria were enriched in greenhouse, paddy, and orchard soils, respectively. Members of these bacterial phyla are indicator taxa that are relatively abundant in specific agricultural land-use types. A relatively large number of taxa were associated with the microbial network of paddy soils with multiple modules, while the microbial network of orchard and upland soils had fewer taxa with close mutual interactions. These results suggest that anthropogenic agricultural management can create soil disturbances that determine bacterial community structures, specific bacterial taxa, and their relationships with soil chemical parameters. These quantitative changes can be used as potential biological indicators for monitoring the impact of agricultural management on the soil environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33060673      PMCID: PMC7562711          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74193-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Diverse soil microbes play critical roles in plant growth and health. They decompose organic compounds and participate in the recycling of nutrients, such as class="Chemical">nitrogen, class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">phosphorus, and potassium, which are important for plant growth[1-3]. Some soil microbes in the rhizosphere and endosphere of plants improve tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress[4]. In addition to physicochemical properties of soils, soil microbial communities largely determine agricultural productivity[5]. To develop sustainable agriculture, understanding of ecological features of microbiomes in agroecosystems is needed. The biogeography of soil microbial communities has been investigated at various spatial scales. Fierer and Jackson (2006) observed that microbial biogeography is primarily controlled by edaphic variables, not geographic distance. Another study of microbial communities in soils collected across the state of California, USA, showed that land-use types such as coastal grasslands, inland grasslands, deserts, coniferous forests, freshclass="Chemical">water wetlaclass="Chemical">nds, aclass="Chemical">nd pereclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nial aclass="Chemical">nd aclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nual agricultural fields were closely associated with disticlass="Chemical">nct microbial commuclass="Chemical">nities at a regioclass="Chemical">nal level[6]. A more receclass="Chemical">nt aclass="Chemical">nd detailed characterizatioclass="Chemical">n of soil microbial commuclass="Chemical">nities reported differeclass="Chemical">nt biogeographic patterclass="Chemical">ns of soil microbial commuclass="Chemical">nities across class="Chemical">natural forests with vegetatioclass="Chemical">n gradieclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd disticlass="Chemical">nct edaphic variables[7]. Differeclass="Chemical">nt patterclass="Chemical">ns of microbial diversity across differeclass="Chemical">nt habitats (e.g., class="Chemical">n class="Species">alpine grassland, desert, desert grassland, and typical grassland) were also observed in the drylands of northern China[8]. These investigations together suggest that the types of habitats or land use affect biogeographic patterns of bacterial taxa from regional to continental scales. Agricultural management such as fertilization, irrigation, and tillage are important factors that affect the biodiversity and function of terrestrial ecosystems and can also lead to soil ecosystem degradation[9-13]. Previous studies show that land management practices such as chemical fertilization have a significant effect on bacterial community structure[14-16]. Effects of soil parameters, including pH, electrical conductivity (EC), class="Chemical">carbon aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">nitrogen contents, salinity, and texture, on microbial community composition have been reported in many studies[17-22], and this relationship was shown to be significant even in unique environments, such as the black soils of Northeast China[23-25]. Bacterial taxa with distinct relative abundance patterns have been proposed as potential biological indicators that reflect environmental conditions. A recent study by Hermans et al. showed that microbial communities across diverse n class="Chemical">New Zealaclass="Chemical">nd soil types (e.g., iclass="Chemical">ndigeclass="Chemical">nous forest, exotic forest, horticulture, aclass="Chemical">nd dairy) are more seclass="Chemical">nsitive to chaclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng soil eclass="Chemical">nviroclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">nts thaclass="Chemical">n to variatioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n climate or iclass="Chemical">ncreased geographical heterogeclass="Chemical">neity[26]. They also observed certaiclass="Chemical">n domiclass="Chemical">naclass="Chemical">nt taxa to be sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly related to specific soil parameters. These results support the use of specific bacterial taxa aclass="Chemical">nd their relative abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nces as biological iclass="Chemical">ndicators that caclass="Chemical">n be used to predict various soil attributes (e.g., pH, class="Chemical">nutrieclass="Chemical">nt coclass="Chemical">nceclass="Chemical">ntratioclass="Chemical">ns). To explore interactions between microbial taxa in complex soil microbial ecology, co-occurrence network analysis has been widely used[27,28]. In the network, keystone taxa that have frequent interactions with many others are predicted to play an important role in microbial ecology[29]. Distinct co-occurrence patterns have been reported in different agricultural practices (organic and conventional farming)[16] and habitats (bulk soil and rhizosphere)[30]. However, the co-occurrence networks of soil bacterial communities in different types of agricultural land use have not been explored using a large number of samples. To elucidate the soil microbial distributions in agricultural soils, we collected 853 soil samples from four major types of agricultural land, including greenhouses, orchards, paddy fields, and uplands, throughout the Republic of Korea. We measured the edaphic factors of the soils and performed 16S rRn class="Chemical">NA geclass="Chemical">ne pyrosequeclass="Chemical">nciclass="Chemical">ng aclass="Chemical">nalysis of bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities. The specific objectives of this study were to characterize bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities iclass="Chemical">n differeclass="Chemical">nt agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd-use types through aclass="Chemical">nalyses of bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nity diversity, compositioclass="Chemical">n, iclass="Chemical">ndicator species, aclass="Chemical">nd co-occurreclass="Chemical">nce patterclass="Chemical">ns.

Results

Bacterial community variation across different agricultural land-use types

To survey bacterial communities in agricultural soils across the Republic of Korea, we collected 853 soil samples from four major types of agricultural land use: greenhouses (211), uplands (209), orchards (224), and paddy fields (209) (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Data S1). We obtained a total of 3,616,347 high-quality sequence reads by 16S rRn class="Chemical">NA geclass="Chemical">ne pyrosequeclass="Chemical">nciclass="Chemical">ng aclass="Chemical">nd ideclass="Chemical">ntified 68,528 operatioclass="Chemical">nal taxoclass="Chemical">nomic uclass="Chemical">nits (OTUs) based oclass="Chemical">n 97% sequeclass="Chemical">nce ideclass="Chemical">ntity across all samples. The variation in bacterial community structures was visualized with a nonmetric multidimensional scale (class="Chemical">NMDS) plot based oclass="Chemical">n Bray–Curtis distaclass="Chemical">nce. Bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities iclass="Chemical">n paddy soils were clearly differeclass="Chemical">ntiated from those iclass="Chemical">n the other types of soil (Fig. 1A). Bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities iclass="Chemical">n greeclass="Chemical">nhouse soils were also differeclass="Chemical">ntiated from those iclass="Chemical">n orchard aclass="Chemical">nd uplaclass="Chemical">nd soils. The sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces betweeclass="Chemical">n agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd-use types were coclass="Chemical">nfirmed by pair-wise comparisoclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">nalysis of similarities (Aclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NOSIM) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) (Supplementary Table S1). Although bacterial communities of orchard and upland soils were closely positioned in the ordination plots (Fig. 1A), the pair-wise comparison tests were significant for all pairs of agricultural land-use types (Supplementary Table S1). The dispersion of soil bacterial communities within each type of agricultural land use was examined by measuring the distance between the centroid. Bacterial community dissimilarity within each type of agricultural land use was the lowest in paddy soils and the highest in upland soils (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

Beta-diversity of soil bacterial communities in the four types of agricultural land use. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of soil bacterial communities (A). Box plot illustrating the beta-dispersion of bacterial communities (B). Significant differences between land-use types were tested by Tukey’s HSD and are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), and whiskers indicate the furthest point within 1.5 × IQR above or below the IQR. Values beyond this range are plotted as individual points. The central line indicates the median.

Beta-diversity of soil bacterial communities in the four types of agricultural land use. class="Chemical">Noclass="Chemical">n-metric multidimeclass="Chemical">nsioclass="Chemical">nal scaliclass="Chemical">ng (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NMDS) ordination of soil bacterial communities (A). Box plot illustrating the beta-dispersion of bacterial communities (B). Significant differences between land-use types were tested by Tukey’s HSD and are indicated by different letters (P < 0.05). Boxes represent the interquartile range (IQR), and whiskers indicate the furthest point within 1.5 × IQR above or below the IQR. Values beyond this range are plotted as individual points. The central line indicates the median. To compare alpha-diversity between the samples, the OTU dataset was sub-sampled to the smallest number of total reads within a sample (1,002 reads). Chao1 and ACE richness estimators were significantly higher in paddy soils, while those in upland soils were lower (Table 1). Similarly, paddy soils showed significantly higher Shannon and inverse-Simpson diversity indices, followed by orchard, greenhouse, and upland soils. Taken together, paddy soils had significantly higher bacterial richness and diversity, with lower bacterial community variation, while upland soils harbored bacterial communities with lower richness and diversity but greater variation compared to other types of agricultural land use. Although the compositions of bacterial communities in upland and orchard soils look similar according to n class="Chemical">NMDS, the greater bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nity variatioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n uplaclass="Chemical">nd soils may partially explaiclass="Chemical">n the sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nce from orchard soils.
Table 1

Alpha-diversity for soil bacterial communities in the four different types of land use.

Land-use typeNo. of OTUsCoverageRichness estimatorDiversity index
Chao-1ACEShannonInverse-Simpson
Greenhouse (n = 211)564 ± 800.60 ± 0.071529 ± 353b2566 ± 692b5.9 ± 0.3c340 ± 183c
Orchard (n = 224)581 ± 850.59 ± 0.081506 ± 366b2374 ± 713c6.0 ± 0.3b403 ± 200b
Paddy (n = 209)623 ± 490.54 ± 0.051778 ± 319a3107 ± 855a6.1 ± 0.2a447 ± 157a
Upland (n = 209)514 ± 800.66 ± 0.071172 ± 300c1764 ± 585d5.8 ± 0.3d290 ± 147d

The original dataset was sub-sampled to 1,002 reads.

a–cThe letters in each column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).

OTUs operational taxonomic units.

Alpha-diversity for soil bacterial communities in the four different types of land use. The original dataset was sub-sampled to 1,002 reads. a–cThe letters in each column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s n class="Disease">HSD). OTUs operational taxonomic units.

Variation in soil chemical properties across different types of agricultural land use

The principal component analysis (PCA) ordination plot showed that soil chemical properties were clearly separated between paddy and greenhouse soils along the first axis, which explains 48.9% of total variation, and those in upland and orchard soils were in between (Fig. 2A). Of the soil properties we measured, EC, available class="Chemical">P2O5, aclass="Chemical">nd exchaclass="Chemical">ngeable catioclass="Chemical">ns (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, and Na+) were significantly higher in greenhouse soils compared to soils of other types of agricultural land use, while paddy soils had significantly lower values of pH and available P2O5, Mg2+, and K+ (Table 2).
Figure 2

Soil chemical properties associated with the types of agricultural land use. Principal component analysis (PCA) of soil chemical properties using z-transformed soil variables (A). The association of bacterial richness (Chao-1) and diversity (Shannon index) with soil pH in different types of agricultural soils (B). Quadratic regression was used to determine the adjusted R2 values and statistical significances (***P < 0.001). Redundancy analysis (RDA) of bacterial communities constrained by soil chemical properties (C). The joint biplot indicates the correlation between the chemical factors and ordination scores of RDA axes. EC electrical conductivity, OM organic matter. Venn diagram representing variation partitioning of bacterial communities explained by land-use types, edaphic and spatial variables (D).

Table 2

Description of soil chemical properties in the four different types of land use.

Land-use typeStatisticspH (1:5)EC (dS m−1)OM (g kg−1)Av. P2O5 (mg kg−1)Ex. cation (cmolc kg-1)
K+Ca2+Mg2+Na+
Greenhouse (n = 211)Mean ± S.D6.5 ± 0.8a3.9 ± 3.9a41.0 ± 22.6a1,023 ± 576a1.7 ± 1.3a11.4 ± 4.7a3.7 ± 1.9a0.9 ± 2.1a
Range4.3–7.80–21.08.1–184.857–3,0180.1–8.50.9–28.70.4–10.00.1–29.1
Orchard (n = 224)Mean ± S.D6.2 ± 0.9a0.7 ± 0.8b38.6 ± 29.1a670 ± 391b0.9 ± 0.7b7.5 ± 3.7b2.0 ± 1.1b0.2 ± 0.2b
Range4.2–7.90.1–7.42.7–178.924–1,9110.1–5.10.5–19.40.2–6.20.0–0.7
Paddy (n = 209)Mean ± S.D5.8 ± 0.6b0.5 ± 0.4b30.1 ± 25.5b139 ± 156c0.3 ± 0.2c5.7 ± 2.7c1.3 ± 0.9c0.3 ± 0.3b
Range4.6–7.50.1–2.56.0–165.06.3–1,0980.1–1.00.8–20.10.2–4.50–2.0
Upland (n = 209)Mean ± S.D6.1 ± 0.9a0.6 ± 0.6b25.5 ± 23.5b589 ± 428b0.8 ± 0.6b6.1 ± 3.7c1.7 ± 0.9b0.2 ± 0.2b
Range4.1–8.40.1–4.14.2–236.021–1,7890.1–3.40.3–29.80.1–5.60.0–0.8

a–cThe letters in each column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s HSD).

EC electrical conductivity, OM organic matter, CV coefficient of variation.

Soil chemical properties associated with the types of agricultural land use. Principal component analysis (PCA) of soil chemical properties using z-transformed soil variables (A). The association of bacterial richness (Chao-1) and diversity (Shannon index) with soil pH in different types of agricultural soils (B). Quadratic regression was used to determine the adjusted R2 values and statistical significances (***P < 0.001). Redundancy analysis (RDA) of bacterial communities constrained by soil chemical properties (C). The joint biplot indicates the correlation between the chemical factors and ordination scores of RDA axes. EC electrical conductivity, OM organic matter. Venn diagram representing variation partitioning of bacterial communities explained by land-use types, edaphic and spatial variables (D). Description of soil chemical properties in the four different types of land use. a–cThe letters in each column indicate significant differences (P < 0.05, Tukey’s n class="Disease">HSD). EC electrical conductivity, OM organic matter, CV coefficient of variation. Among the edaphic factors measured, bacterial richness (Chao-1) and diversity (Shannon index) had a significant association with soil pH (Fig. 2B). Bacterial richness and diversity were the highest in neutral soils and lower in acidic soil, which is consistent with previous studies that utilized a variety of biogeographical scales and land uses[6,17,23,31,32]. In particular, bacterial richness and diversity in orchard soils showed the strongest correlation with soil pH, while those in paddy soils with lower pH levels (pH 5.0–6.0) showed no significant correlation (Supplementary Fig. S2 and S3). The redundancy analysis (RDA) ordination plot constrained by soil chemical properties also showed that bacterial communities were separated by agricultural land-use types along the first axis (Fig. 2C). The chemical properties we measured in this study explained 14.1% of the total variation. The triplots show that EC and K+ are important factors in the dispersion of the bacterial communities along the first axis. We identified specific OTUs that are highly correlated with chemical properties (Pearson r > 0.5, P < 0.01). Only six OTUs were correlated with EC, which belonged to the families Rhodospirillaceae (OTU4130, OTU5485, OTU340, and OTU505) and Rhodobacteraceae (OTU4767) and the phylum Chloroflexi (OTU269) (Supplementary Fig. S4). Although many studies have reported that microbial community similarity tends to decrease along increasing geographical distances[33,34], no significant distance-decay patterns of bacterial communities in agricultural soils were observed (Supplementary Fig. S5). Variation partitioning analysis was performed with three explanatory components—land-use types, edaphic and spatial variables. The spatial variables were generated via Moran’s eigenvector maps (MEMs) as a method of spatial eigenfunction. Variation partition analysis showed that 15.0% of the total bacterial community variation was explained by land-use type, 11.8% by edaphic variables, and 3.9% by spatial variables (Fig. 2D). Land-use type and edaphic variables jointly demonstrated 7.3% of the community variation, suggesting that a large proportion of variability in soil chemical properties are associated with the changes in the use of land. For different types of agricultural land use, edaphic variables (11.9% in orchard, 10.2% in paddy, and 9.8% in greenhouse soils) was shown to be higher than spatial variables (6.7% in orchard, 7.2% in paddy, and 5.9% in greenhouse soils) (Supplementary Fig. S6). Taken together, despite the various unknown factors that influence community variation, soil chemical properties derived by agricultural land use significantly affect bacterial community structures.

Indicator taxa for specific types of agricultural land use

Of the 68,528 OTUs obtained from 853 soil samples across four types of agricultural land, 47,095 (68.7%) OTUs were assigned to phylum-level taxa. At lower taxonomic levels, 38,572 (56.3%), 29,381 (42.9%), 20,198 (29.5%), and 12,169 (17.8%) OTUs were assigned to class, order, family, and genus, respectively. Among the 40 phyla identified in this study, eight had relative abundances greater than 1% and accounted for 81% of the total abundance, with Proteobacteria (32.7%), Acidobacteria (14.9%), and Actinobacteria (10.5%) being the dominant phyla of the bacterial communities across soils of different agricultural land-use types (Fig. 3). Relative abundances of Bacteroidetes (10.3%) and Firmicutes (8.8%) were higher in greenhouse soils than in other soils, while Acidobacteria (19.1% and 20.2%, respectively) in orchard and upland soils were more abundant than the other two soils. The relative abundances of Chloroflexi (15.5%) and Deltaproteobacteria (7.6%) in paddy soils were two to three times higher, while that of Alphaproteobacteria (9.5%) was lower than those of soils of the other agricultural land-use types.
Figure 3

Taxonomic distribution of the bacterial communities in the four types of agricultural land use. The phyla with an abundance of < 1% are indicated as “others”. For Proteobacteria, the classes are indicated. The stacked column bar graph was generated using Microsoft Excel software.

Taxonomic distribution of the bacterial communities in the four types of agricultural land use. The phyla with an abundance of < 1% are indicated as “others”. For Proteobacteria, the classes are indicated. The stacked column bar graph was generated using Microsoft Excel software. To identify individual OTUs sensitive to specific agricultural land-use type, indicator species analysis was performed based on point biserial correlation. The 391 OTUs had significant associations (point biserial correlation coefficient R > 0.4 and P < 0.001) with a particular agricultural land-use type or its combinations, which were illustrated with a class="Chemical">bipartite class="Chemical">network (Fig. 4). The sequeclass="Chemical">nce reads of these iclass="Chemical">ndictor OTUs accouclass="Chemical">nted for 15.5% of the total class="Chemical">number of sequeclass="Chemical">nces. Paddy soils had the most iclass="Chemical">ndicator OTUs (287), with a relative abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce of 25.6%, followed by greeclass="Chemical">nhouse (78 OTUs, with a relative abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce of 10.4%), orchard (15 OTUs, with a relative abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce of 1.6%), aclass="Chemical">nd uplaclass="Chemical">nd (1 OTU, with a relative abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce of 0.1%) soils, iclass="Chemical">ndicaticlass="Chemical">ng that paddy soils provide a more disticlass="Chemical">nctive class="Chemical">niche thaclass="Chemical">n the other laclass="Chemical">nd-use types do. The iclass="Chemical">ndicator taxa of paddy soils comprised OTUs beloclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng maiclass="Chemical">nly to the phyla Chloroflexi aclass="Chemical">nd Acidobacteria, aclass="Chemical">nd those of greeclass="Chemical">nhouse soils coclass="Chemical">ntaiclass="Chemical">ned OTUs beloclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng maiclass="Chemical">nly to the phylum Firmicutes aclass="Chemical">nd the class Alphaproteobacteria. The orchard soils had iclass="Chemical">ndicator taxa beloclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng to Acidobacteria, iclass="Chemical">n particular, subgroup 6 aclass="Chemical">nd the phylum class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">Nitrospirae. The upland soils had only one specific indicator taxon, which belonged to the genus Gemmatimonas.
Figure 4

Bipartite network showing the associations between the four types of land use and 391 significantly associated OTUs (P < 0.01). Edges (node connection) show the association of individual OTUs with each type of agricultural land use. OTUs are colored by phylum or class. The network analysis was visualized using Gephi 0.9.1.

n class="Chemical">Bipartite class="Chemical">network showiclass="Chemical">ng the associatioclass="Chemical">ns betweeclass="Chemical">n the four types of laclass="Chemical">nd use aclass="Chemical">nd 391 sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly associated OTUs (P < 0.01). Edges (class="Chemical">node coclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nectioclass="Chemical">n) show the associatioclass="Chemical">n of iclass="Chemical">ndividual OTUs with each type of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use. OTUs are colored by phylum or class. The class="Chemical">network aclass="Chemical">nalysis was visualized usiclass="Chemical">ng Gephi 0.9.1. Of indicator taxa of each agricultural land-use type, the most abundant OTUs were OTU174 (0.94%), OTU7 (0.98%), OTU8 (0.45%), and OTU1562 (0.16%) in paddy, greenhouse, orchard, and upland soils, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S7). OTU174 was affiliated with Chloroflexi and clustered with class="Species">uncultured bacterial cloclass="Chemical">nes detected iclass="Chemical">n paddy soils. OTU7 was phylogeclass="Chemical">netically close to Bacillus isolated from the rhizosphere soil of class="Chemical">n class="Species">cucumber and tomato, which are the main vegetables grown in greenhouses. OTU8 was affiliated with Nitrospirae and clustered with uncultured bacterial clones observed in soils growing trees and grasses. OTU1562 belongs to Gemmatimonadetes and was clustered with uncultured bacterial clones observed in cropping soils with peanut, tobacco, and vegetables. To conclude, the majority of bacterial communities in soils were not differentiated by the types of agricultural land use, and there were distinct taxa specific to agricultural land use.

Co-occurrence networks of soil bacterial communities in different types of agricultural land use

To explore the complex microbial community structures in different types of agricultural land use, we performed co-occurrence network analysis using molecular ecological network analyses (MEclass="Chemical">NA) based oclass="Chemical">n raclass="Chemical">ndom-metric theory (RMT). Iclass="Chemical">n the class="Chemical">network aclass="Chemical">nalysis, commoclass="Chemical">n OTUs preseclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">n > 50% of samples were used. The class="Chemical">network coclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">nectivity with a high level of R2 of power-law (> 0.7) iclass="Chemical">ndicated scale-free properties (Supplemeclass="Chemical">ntary Table S2). The class="Chemical">number of OTUs associated with the class="Chemical">networks were the highest iclass="Chemical">n paddy soils aclass="Chemical">nd the lowest iclass="Chemical">n uplaclass="Chemical">nd soils (Fig. 5). The average class="Chemical">network distaclass="Chemical">nce, referred to as the average path leclass="Chemical">ngth (class="Chemical">n class="Disease">GD), was the highest in the network of paddy soils. However, the connectivity between OTUs, referred to as average degree (avgK), were the highest in the network of orchard soils, followed by upland, paddy, and greenhouse soils. The results of network topology showed that relatively large numbers of bacterial taxa in the bacterial communities of paddy and greenhouse soils were associated with the co-occurrence networks but were not densely connected to each other, while relatively low numbers of OTUs associated with the networks of orchard and upland soils tended to be closely connected to each other.
Figure 5

Co-occurrence networks of each type of agricultural land use. Circles and triangles indicate OTUs associated in the network. In particular, triangles represent indicator OTUs analyzed in Fig. 4. The size of circles and triangles is proportional to the number of degrees. OTUs are colored by phylum. The network analysis was visualized using Gephi 0.9.1.

Co-occurrence networks of each type of agricultural land use. Circles and triangles indicate OTUs associated in the network. In particular, triangles represent indicator OTUs analyzed in Fig. 4. The size of circles and triangles is proportional to the number of degrees. OTUs are colored by phylum. The network analysis was visualized using Gephi 0.9.1. class="Chemical">Next, we ideclass="Chemical">ntified OTUs that have the most frequeclass="Chemical">nt iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns with other taxa aclass="Chemical">nd the highest value of betweeclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">ness ceclass="Chemical">ntrality iclass="Chemical">n the co-occurreclass="Chemical">nce class="Chemical">networks, which are poteclass="Chemical">ntial keystoclass="Chemical">ne taxa playiclass="Chemical">ng aclass="Chemical">n importaclass="Chemical">nt role iclass="Chemical">n a microbial ecosystem. The keystoclass="Chemical">ne OTUs also varied with the types of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use: OTU46927 (phylum Chloroflexi) iclass="Chemical">n paddy soils, OTU37000 (class Gammaproteobacteria) iclass="Chemical">n greeclass="Chemical">nhouse soils, OTU608 aclass="Chemical">nd OTU16 (phylum Acidobacteria) iclass="Chemical">n orchard soils, aclass="Chemical">nd OTU127 (phylum Acidobacteria) iclass="Chemical">n uplaclass="Chemical">nd soils (Supplemeclass="Chemical">ntary Fig. S8). class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">None of them were identified as indicator OTUs that are highly abundant in specific types of agricultural land use, as described above. Most of the indicator OTUs in the networks showed relatively less connectivity with other OTUs (Fig. 5), indicating that keystone taxa with high connectivity are independent of indicator taxa.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated soil bacterial distributions across four types of agricultural land use, including greenhouses, orchards, paddy cultivation, and uplands, throughout the Republic of Korea. The bacterial diversities and community structures were clearly differentiated by agricultural land-use type (Fig. 1 and Table 1), which were represented as soil chemical properties, of which paddy soils showed the most distinct characteristics in comparison with the other land-use types; greenhouse soils also had different characteristics from those of orchard and upland soils (Fig. 2 and Table 2). The subset of bacterial taxa in the communities were specific to each land type, which were related to different phylum distributions (Figs. 3 and 4). The bacterial communities in different types of agricultural land use exhibited distinct co-occurrence patterns (Fig. 5).

The type of agricultural land use affects soil bacterial community structures

The bacterial community structures were differentiated by the types of agricultural land use, as observed by class="Chemical">NMDS aclass="Chemical">nalysis (Fig. 1). These results are coclass="Chemical">nsisteclass="Chemical">nt with ficlass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ngs reported by previous studies that iclass="Chemical">nvestigated the respoclass="Chemical">nses of bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities to agricultural maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nt, such as coclass="Chemical">nveclass="Chemical">ntioclass="Chemical">nal versus coclass="Chemical">nservatioclass="Chemical">n agriculture practices[16,35,36]. Agricultural maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nt practices such as irrigatioclass="Chemical">n, fertilizatioclass="Chemical">n, tillage, aclass="Chemical">nd the applicatioclass="Chemical">n of placlass="Chemical">nt protectioclass="Chemical">n chemicals caclass="Chemical">n vary across laclass="Chemical">nd-use types depeclass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ng oclass="Chemical">n the cultivated crops. Our study aimed to coclass="Chemical">nduct a class="Chemical">natioclass="Chemical">nwide survey of bacterial distributioclass="Chemical">n across four differeclass="Chemical">nt types of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use at large spatial scales; however, the impact of iclass="Chemical">ndividual maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nt practice oclass="Chemical">n bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities was class="Chemical">not iclass="Chemical">nvestigated. Iclass="Chemical">nstead, we hypothesized that the maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nt practices iclass="Chemical">n each type of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use represeclass="Chemical">nt soil chemical properties. class="Chemical">n class="Species">Rice paddy fields are unique environments as a flooded parcel of arable land, which can be further divided into oxic surface soil and anoxic bulk soil during rice cultivation[37]. Microscale gradients of oxygen within these soil compartments influence the spatial distribution of microbial communities, leading to the highest bacterial richness and diversity (Table 1), with the most distinguishable community structure from those of the other land-use types (Fig. 1). It is generally known that bacterial richness and diversity are the highest in neutral soils and lower in acidic soils[17]. We also observed the unimodal diversity patterns in agricultural soils except for paddy soils. Most paddy soils had a rather narrow pH range (pH 5.0–6.0), which is not sufficiently broad for pattern detection. Although paddy soils had relatively lower pH values than other land-use types, their higher bacterial richness and diversity might be responsible for the distinct environments supported diverse microbial niches. Greenhouse farming is subject to intensive agricultural material inputs to enhance productivity, resulting in an accumulation of chemical components in the soil, such as available P2O5 and exchangeable cations[38]. This relates to the distinct chemical properties of greenhouse soils that differentiate it from other land-use types with significantly higher values of EC, available P2O5, and exchangeable cations (Fig. 2). These chemical factors are known to affect soil microbial community structures[31,39-43]. Although orchard and upland systems cultivated with perennial and annual plants in open fields, respectively, showed similar soil chemical properties (Table 2), crop species can affect soil microenvironments through differences in root exudates or leaf litter produced[44], leading to different bacterial community structures in various agricultural land-use types. Overall, our results indicate that agricultural management practices corresponding to types of agricultural land use have significant impacts on soil chemical properties and drive variation in bacterial community structures. Studies have shown that environmental variables generally change with spatial gradients, which are correlated with bacterial biogeography[23,32]. However, the soil chemical properties measured in this study did not show a spatial gradient due to intensive anthropogenic activities applied under each type of agricultural land use for crop cultivation. Variation partitioning analysis, represented by the type of agricultural land use and edaphic variables, were major determinants of bacterial community structure in agricultural soils (Fig. 2). This explains why variations in bacterial communities within each type of agricultural land use were more closely associated with soil chemical properties and that the effects of past dispersal or disturbance events were minimized.

Distribution of bacterial taxa specific to agricultural land-use types

In this study, we aimed to identify OTUs sensitive to agricultural land-use types by performing a correlation-based indicator species analysis[45]. We identified 391 OTUs having strong and significant correlations with types of agricultural land use, indicating that specific OTUs are prevalently distributed in their preferred types of agricultural land use. These relationships further suggest ecological attributes of these taxa that are sensitive to environmental conditions of certain agricultural land-use types. In particular, paddy soils had a much greater number of indicator OTUs (287) than other types of agricultural land use. Most of the paddy indicator OTUs were related to the phylum Chloroflexi (Fig. 4), with a relatively higher abundance over the other three types of agricultural land use (Fig. 3). The isolates of Chloroflexi have been detected in anaerobic environments such as sediments, hot springs, and sludge and include mesophilic and thermophilic aerobic and anaerobic chemoheterotrophs[46-49]. Chloroflexi is prevalent in oligotrophic environments, such as nutrient-poor soils[50,51] and class="Species">alpine tuclass="Chemical">ndra soil[52]. Siclass="Chemical">nce flooded paddy fields provide aclass="Chemical">naerobic coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns aclass="Chemical">nd have lower EC, available class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">P2O5, and exchangeable cations compared to other types of land use, the abundances of Chloroflexi were relatively high in rice paddy soils, consistent with previous studies[53-55]. Acidobacteria was one of the abundant phyla not only in paddy but also in orchard indicator OTUs. This conflicting relationship implies that soils harbor different compositions of the phylum Acidobacteria at lower taxonomic levels according to agricultural land-use types: orchard-related indicator OTUs mainly comprised subgroup 6, while paddy-related indicator OTUs comprised subgroups 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 16, and 18. Relationships between acidobacterial abundance and soil chemical properties, such as class="Chemical">carbon ameclass="Chemical">ndmeclass="Chemical">nt level aclass="Chemical">nd soil pH, have beeclass="Chemical">n reported[56,57]. Iclass="Chemical">n particular, class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">Navarrete et al.[58] described Acidobacteria subgroups that exhibited different correlations with soil parameters. For example, Acidobacteria subgroups 1, 2, and 13 had negative relationships with soil properties, such as pH, N, C, P, Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+, while Acidobacteria subgroups 4, 5, and 6 were positively correlated with these soil factors. This result is consistent with our finding wherein Acidobacteria subgroups had different distributions in paddy and orchard soils. Many indicator OTUs in the greenhouse soils were associated with Firmicutes at a relatively higher abundance than that of the other types of agricultural land use (Fig. 4). Their high abundance in greenhouse soils, which contain relatively high levels of edaphic factors, is supported by previous studies that reported the prevalence of Firmicutes in copiotrophic environments, such as agricultural fields with nutrient inputs[59] and soils with agricultural intensification[60]. In particular, OTU7 (0.98%), affiliated with Bacillus, was the most abundant among the greenhouse indicator OTUs, which were clustered with Bacillus strains isolated from the rhizosphere or endosphere of vegetables such as class="Species">tomatoes aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Species">cucumbers (Supplementary Fig. S7). Bacillus species are beneficial bacteria well-known to promote plant growth and enhance plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses[61]. Since vegetables grow continuously in greenhouse soils with fertilizers, members of Bacillus closely associated with these plants seem to be predominant in greenhouse soil. We identified six OTUs that were strongly correlated with sensitivity to EC (Supplementary Fig. S4). They were assigned to Rhodospirillaceae (OTU_4103, OTU_5485, OTU_340, and OTU_505), Rhodobacteraceae (OTU_4767), and Chloroflexi (OTU_269). Rhodospirillaceae and Rhodobacteraceae are families in the subclass Alphaproteobacteria and comprise n class="Species">purple non-sulfur bacteria that are phototrophic iclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">naerobic eclass="Chemical">nviroclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">nts[62,63]. Although EC was oclass="Chemical">ne of the edaphic factors higher iclass="Chemical">n the greeclass="Chemical">nhouse soils, oclass="Chemical">nly two OTUs of EC-seclass="Chemical">nsitive OTUs were greeclass="Chemical">nhouse-related iclass="Chemical">ndicator OTUs, iclass="Chemical">ndicaticlass="Chemical">ng that iclass="Chemical">n additioclass="Chemical">n to chemical properties of soils, complex factors iclass="Chemical">n differeclass="Chemical">nt farmiclass="Chemical">ng systems iclass="Chemical">nflueclass="Chemical">nce specific OTUs. Our results highlight the poteclass="Chemical">ntial of these OTUs as applicable biological iclass="Chemical">ndicators for moclass="Chemical">nitoriclass="Chemical">ng how soil coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns are affected by agricultural maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nts.

Effects of agricultural land-use type on co-occurrence networks

We explored bacterial co-occurrence patterns in different types of agricultural land use with a large collection of soil samples from across the Republic of Korea. The microbial interactions in networks show the structure and dynamics of soil microbial communities[27]. The members associated with the network and its topologies clearly varied with the types of agricultural land use (Fig. 5, Supplementary Table S2). Consistent with higher species richness in paddy soils, a relatively large number of OTUs were associated with the network of paddy soils. Moreover, the number of modules was the highest in the microbial network of paddy soils. Given that a module is a cluster of densely interconnected nodes and indicates groups of taxa with overlapping niches[28], it seemed to reflect multiple niches caused by the unique environmental feature of paddy soil. In contrast, microbial networks of orchard soils were relatively small, but the interactions were close to each other. In an analysis of microbial co-occurrence patterns in forest, grassland, crop system, and vineyard soils, the network complexity was found to be lowered by high cropping intensity[64]. As orchards undergo less tillage and fruit trees are continuously grown for several years, the cropping intensity of orchards is relatively lower than that of other agricultural land-use types such as greenhouse and paddy cultivation. This might explain the more complex microbial interactions in orchard soils. The highly connected OTUs, referred to as keystone taxa, also varied with the types of agricultural land use (Fig. 5 and Fig S3). The keystone taxa in the networks of orchard and upland soils were members of Acidobacteria, which is the phylum enriched in both soils. Given the similar network topology and beta-diversity of bacterial communities in orchard and upland soils, these two agricultural land-use types might have similar agro-ecosystems, which can be inferred from similar chemical properties between the two types. The keystone taxa in the microbial networks of greenhouse and paddy soils were affiliated with Gammaproteobacteria and Chloroflexi, respectively, which were also the relatively more abundant phyla in these soils compared to other soils studied. Although keystone taxa are known to play important roles in microbial communities, the relative abundances of the keystone OTUs were low, and none of them were indicator taxa. Most indicator taxa associated with the microbial networks had a few links. This result is consistent with the study that most indicator OTUs in the n class="Species">soil microbiome with differeclass="Chemical">nt croppiclass="Chemical">ng practices, iclass="Chemical">ncludiclass="Chemical">ng orgaclass="Chemical">nic maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd tillage iclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nsities, were class="Chemical">not keystoclass="Chemical">ne taxa[65], suggesticlass="Chemical">ng that keystoclass="Chemical">ne taxa were class="Chemical">not sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by eclass="Chemical">nviroclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">ntal disturbaclass="Chemical">nces, but those iclass="Chemical">ndicator taxa were affected by agricultural activities.

Conclusion

The soil environment is a dynamic and highly complex system composed of microbes that are affected by various biotic (i.e., n class="Species">earthworms, arthropods, aclass="Chemical">nd microbial domaiclass="Chemical">ns) aclass="Chemical">nd abiotic (i.e., precipitatioclass="Chemical">n, temperature, humidity, aclass="Chemical">nd aclass="Chemical">nthropogeclass="Chemical">nic effects) factors. Our study showed that agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd-use types determiclass="Chemical">ned bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nity structures aclass="Chemical">nd specific taxa were eclass="Chemical">nriched iclass="Chemical">n specific types of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use, with disticlass="Chemical">nct correlatioclass="Chemical">ns with soil chemical properties. Furthermore, microbial iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns based oclass="Chemical">n the co-occurreclass="Chemical">nce patterclass="Chemical">ns iclass="Chemical">n soil bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities also varied with agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd-use types. Our ficlass="Chemical">ndiclass="Chemical">ngs provide a class="Chemical">novel perspective of how laclass="Chemical">nd-use type-specific taxa reflect soil coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns aclass="Chemical">nd caclass="Chemical">n thus be used as poteclass="Chemical">ntial biological iclass="Chemical">ndicators for maiclass="Chemical">ntaiclass="Chemical">niclass="Chemical">ng soil health aclass="Chemical">nd sustaiclass="Chemical">nable crop productioclass="Chemical">n. Further research is class="Chemical">needed to explore relatioclass="Chemical">nships betweeclass="Chemical">n soil fertility, crop productivity, aclass="Chemical">nd microbial commuclass="Chemical">nity structure, which will help us better uclass="Chemical">nderstaclass="Chemical">nd which bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities or specific taxa support sustaiclass="Chemical">nable agricultural maclass="Chemical">nagemeclass="Chemical">nt.

Materials and methods

Soil sampling

Soil sampling was conducted between March 2013 and May 2016 throughout the Republic of Korea (Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Data S1). Soil samples were collected from the southern regions in March and the northern regions in May to decrease temperature variation, except for the paddy fields, where samples were taken from March to April, before the flood period. A total of 853 soil samples were collected and grouped into four types of agricultural land use, namely, greenhouse, orchard, n class="Species">rice paddy, aclass="Chemical">nd uplaclass="Chemical">nd. Sampliclass="Chemical">ng was coclass="Chemical">nducted iclass="Chemical">n the order of uplaclass="Chemical">nds (2013), orchards (2014), paddy fields (2015), aclass="Chemical">nd greeclass="Chemical">nhouses (2016). At each sampliclass="Chemical">ng site, a total of teclass="Chemical">n soil cores were takeclass="Chemical">n at 10 m iclass="Chemical">ntervals to a depth of 15 cm, pooled together iclass="Chemical">n a sterile plastic bag, aclass="Chemical">nd traclass="Chemical">nsported to the laboratory iclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">n ice-filled cooler. The latitude aclass="Chemical">nd loclass="Chemical">ngitude of each sampliclass="Chemical">ng site were recorded usiclass="Chemical">ng a haclass="Chemical">nd-held global positioclass="Chemical">niclass="Chemical">ng system.

Determination of soil physicochemical properties

Soil samples were mixed well and sieved through a 2 mm mesh. Samples were pre-incubated at 22 °C for 7 days to reduce environmental disturbances during sampling and sieving[66] and stored at − 80 °C until further molecular analysis. Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured using a pH meter (CyberScan pH1500; EUTECH, USA) and an EC meter (D-54; Horiba, Japan), respectively, after shaking the soil/class="Chemical">water (1:5) mixture for 30 miclass="Chemical">n at 200 rpm. The orgaclass="Chemical">nic matter (OM) coclass="Chemical">nteclass="Chemical">nt was measured usiclass="Chemical">ng the Walkely aclass="Chemical">nd Black method[67], aclass="Chemical">nd the available class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">P2O5 content was measured by the Lancaster method[68]. Exchangeable cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+) were extracted with 1 M NH4OAc (pH 7.0) from soil samples and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES; GBC Integra-XMP, Melbourne, Australia).

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA pyrosequencing

Dclass="Chemical">NA was extracted from approximately 0.5 g of the soil samples iclass="Chemical">n duplicate usiclass="Chemical">ng the FastDclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA extracts were quantified using an ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Integrity of DNA was confirmed by running the DNA extracts on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel with 0.5X TBE buffer (45 mM Tris–borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). PCR amplification, purification, and pyrosequencing of partial 16S rRclass="Chemical">NA geclass="Chemical">nes were performed at the class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">National Instrumentation Center of Environmental Management (NICEM; Seoul, Republic of Korea) using the 454 GS FLX Titanium Sequencing System (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT, USA). Briefly, PCR amplification was performed using the specifically designed fusion primers V1-9F (5ʹ-X-AC-GAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3ʹ) and V3-541R (5ʹ-X-AC-WTTACCGCGGCTGCTGG-3ʹ), which contained linker sequences (AC) and 7–10 barcode sequences, under the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 10 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s for denaturation, 60 °C for 45 s for annealing, and 72 °C for 90 s for elongation, with the annealing temperature reduced by 0.5 °C per cycle from the preceding cycle. Twenty additional cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 90 s were performed [31]. Each PCR mixture (50 μL) included 5 μL of 10X buffer, 1 μL of dNTP mix (10 mM), 1 μL of each fusion primer (50 pmol), 40.8 μL of sterile deionized H2O, 1 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (1 U), and 1 μL of template DNA (1 ng). PCR products were pooled at equimolar concentrations for pyrosequencing reactions.

Analysis of pyrosequencing data

Clustering of 16S rRn class="Chemical">NA amplicoclass="Chemical">n sequeclass="Chemical">nce reads iclass="Chemical">nto operatioclass="Chemical">nal taxoclass="Chemical">nomic uclass="Chemical">nits (OTUs) was performed usiclass="Chemical">ng the UPARSE pipeliclass="Chemical">ne[69] with some modificatioclass="Chemical">ns. Briefly, barcode aclass="Chemical">nd primer sequeclass="Chemical">nces were removed usiclass="Chemical">ng the trim.fastq script. Reads shorter thaclass="Chemical">n 300 bp were removed, aclass="Chemical">nd those loclass="Chemical">nger thaclass="Chemical">n 300 bp were properly trimmed. Reads were theclass="Chemical">n clustered iclass="Chemical">nto OTUs at a cutoff of 0.03 usiclass="Chemical">ng the UPARSE-OTU algorithm. Chimeras were removed iclass="Chemical">n de class="Chemical">novo aclass="Chemical">nd refereclass="Chemical">nce modes usiclass="Chemical">ng UCHIME aclass="Chemical">nd USEARCH, respectively. The resulticlass="Chemical">ng OTU table was traclass="Chemical">nsformed usiclass="Chemical">ng customized perl scripts for use iclass="Chemical">n the MOTHUR program[70]. Taxoclass="Chemical">nomic assigclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">nt was carried out usiclass="Chemical">ng the classify.seqs commaclass="Chemical">nd (iters = 1,000 aclass="Chemical">nd cutoff = 60) iclass="Chemical">n the MOTHUR program based oclass="Chemical">n the Ribosomal Database Project database (RDP versioclass="Chemical">n 14; https://rdp.cme.msu.edu). After the read class="Chemical">number iclass="Chemical">n each sample was class="Chemical">normalized to that of the sample with the smallest class="Chemical">number of reads (1,002 reads), Good’s coverage, richclass="Chemical">ness estimator (abuclass="Chemical">ndaclass="Chemical">nce-based coverage estimator (ACE) aclass="Chemical">nd Chao1), aclass="Chemical">nd diversity iclass="Chemical">ndices (Shaclass="Chemical">nclass="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">n aclass="Chemical">nd iclass="Chemical">nverse-Simpsoclass="Chemical">n) were calculated usiclass="Chemical">ng the MOTHUR program.

Bioinformatics analyses

Statistical analyses in this study were performed using the R program ver. 3.3.1; R Core Team[71]. Variations in bacterial community structures among the different land-use types were visualized using non-metric multidimensional scaling (class="Chemical">NMDS) based oclass="Chemical">n the Bray–Curtis distaclass="Chemical">nce of Helliclass="Chemical">nger-traclass="Chemical">nsformed OTU class="Chemical">numbers usiclass="Chemical">ng metaMDS aclass="Chemical">nd decostaclass="Chemical">nd fuclass="Chemical">nctioclass="Chemical">ns iclass="Chemical">n the vegaclass="Chemical">n package. The dispersioclass="Chemical">n of bacterial commuclass="Chemical">nities was measured usiclass="Chemical">ng the betadisper fuclass="Chemical">nctioclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n the vegaclass="Chemical">n package. Aclass="Chemical">nalysis of similarities (Aclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NOSIM) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) were performed for pair-wise comparisons of soil microbial communities with four different types of agricultural land use using the anosim and adonis functions in the R package vegan, respectively. Soil chemical parameters were log-transformed for normal distribution, while raw data was used for pH, and variations were visualized using principal component analysis (PCA). The constrained ordination analysis of bacterial communities by soil chemical properties was performed using redundancy analysis (RDA) with the rda function in the R package. The correlation between soil chemical properties and relative abundances of OTUs were examined using the cor.test function based on Pearson’s correlation method. The statistical analysis of distance-decay patterns, and the relationship between bacterial diversity and soil pH were performed using quadratic regression. Variation partitioning analysis was performed using the varpart function in the vegan R package to assess the relative influence of edaphic variables, land-use type, and geographic distance on bacterial community structures. To perform spatially explicit multiscale modeling, spatial variables were calculated using the MEMs approach in adespatial R package[72]. The connectivity matrix (relative neighborhood) weighted by the Euclidian distance function was generated, followed by a forward selection procedure that was used to select the set of MEM variables which best explained the community variation based on adjusted the R2 statistics. To identify the OTUs that were specifically abundant in each type of agricultural land use, indicator species analysis was conducted using the multipatt function with the r.g option in the R package indispecies. The strength of association of each OTU with a particular agricultural land-use type or its combinations was represented as a point-biserial correlation coefficient R using correlation-based indicator species analysis[45]. The false discovery rate (FDR) was used for multiple comparison correction[73] using the R package FSA[74]. The n class="Chemical">bipartite class="Chemical">network was visualized with Gephi 0.9.1[75]. Co-occurrence network analysis was conducted using molecular ecological network analyses (MEclass="Chemical">NA) based oclass="Chemical">n raclass="Chemical">ndom-metric theory (RMT)[76]. To reduce eclass="Chemical">nviroclass="Chemical">nmeclass="Chemical">ntal disturbaclass="Chemical">nce, datasets were separated by the types of agricultural laclass="Chemical">nd use, aclass="Chemical">nd OTUs detected iclass="Chemical">n > 50% of samples were used iclass="Chemical">n the aclass="Chemical">nalysis. The detailed optioclass="Chemical">ns of MEclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">NA were as follows: 0.01 was filled in the blanks with paired valid values; logarithm values were obtained; Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis; and calculations were done by decreasing the cutoff from the top with Poisson regression only. A similarity threshold was selected automatically by the RMT-based approach to define the adjacency matrix. The results of the network analysis were visualized using Gephi 0.9.1[75]. Supplementary file1 Supplementary file2
  52 in total

Review 1.  Microbiology of flooded rice paddies.

Authors:  W Liesack; S Schnell; N P Revsbech
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 2.  The uncultured microbial majority.

Authors:  Michael S Rappé; Stephen J Giovannoni
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  Bacterial indicator taxa in soils under different long-term agricultural management.

Authors:  N G Jiménez-Bueno; C Valenzuela-Encinas; R Marsch; D Ortiz-Gutiérrez; N Verhulst; B Govaerts; L Dendooven; Y E Navarro-Noya
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses.

Authors:  Ryan T Jones; Michael S Robeson; Christian L Lauber; Micah Hamady; Rob Knight; Noah Fierer
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 10.302

7.  Highly heterogeneous soil bacterial communities around Terra Nova Bay of Northern Victoria Land, Antarctica.

Authors:  Mincheol Kim; Ahnna Cho; Hyoun Soo Lim; Soon Gyu Hong; Ji Hee Kim; Joohan Lee; Taejin Choi; Tae Seok Ahn; Ok-Sun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Biogeography of Soil Bacterial Networks along a Gradient of Cropping Intensity.

Authors:  Battle Karimi; Samuel Dequiedt; Sébastien Terrat; Claudy Jolivet; Dominique Arrouays; Patrick Wincker; Corinne Cruaud; Antonio Bispo; Nicolas Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré; Lionel Ranjard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Phylogeny, Biodiversity, and Ecology of the Chloroflexi in Activated Sludge.

Authors:  Lachlan B M Speirs; Daniel T F Rice; Steve Petrovski; Robert J Seviour
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Response of Soil Properties and Microbial Communities to Agriculture: Implications for Primary Productivity and Soil Health Indicators.

Authors:  Pankaj Trivedi; Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo; Ian C Anderson; Brajesh K Singh
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  4 in total

1.  The profile of the soil microbiota in the Cerrado is influenced by land use.

Authors:  Lucas Conceição de Souza; Luciano Procópio
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Effect of Low-Input Organic and Conventional Farming Systems on Maize Rhizosphere in Two Portuguese Open-Pollinated Varieties (OPV), "Pigarro" (Improved Landrace) and "SinPre" (a Composite Cross Population).

Authors:  Aitana Ares; Joana Costa; Carolina Joaquim; Duarte Pintado; Daniela Santos; Monika M Messmer; Pedro M Mendes-Moreira
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Evaluation of nutrient characteristics and bacterial community in agricultural soil groups for sustainable land management.

Authors:  Sumeth Wongkiew; Pasicha Chaikaew; Natta Takrattanasaran; Thanachanok Khamkajorn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Tillage Promotes the Migration and Coexistence of Bacteria Communities from an Agro-Pastoral Ecotone of Tibet.

Authors:  Yuhong Zhao; Mingtao Wang; Yuyi Yang; Peng Shang; Weihong Zhang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.