| Literature DB >> 25350160 |
Martin Hartmann1, Beat Frey2, Jochen Mayer3, Paul Mäder4, Franco Widmer5.
Abstract
Low-input agricultural systems aim at reducing the use of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides in order to improve sustainable production and ecosystem health. Despite the integral role of the soil microbiome in agricultural productionpan>, we still have a limited understanding of the complex responpan>se of microbial diversity to organic and conpan>ventionpan>al farming. Here we report onpan> the structural responpan>se of the soil microbiome to more than two decades of different agricultural management in a long-term field experiment using a high-throughput pyrosequencing approach of bacterial and fungal ribosomal markers. Organic farming increased richness, decreased evenness, reduced dispersion and shifted the structure of the soil microbiota when compared with conventionally managed soils under exclusively mineral fertilization. This effect was largely attributed to the use and quality of organic fertilizers, as differences became smaller when conventionally managed soils under an integrated fertilization scheme were examined. The impact of the plant protection regime, characterized by moderate and targeted application of pesticides, was of subordinate importance. Systems not receiving manure harboured a dispersed and functionally versatile community characterized by presumably oligotrophic organisms adapted to nutrient-limited environments. Systems receiving organic fertilizer were characterized by specific microbial guilds known to be involved in degradation of complex organic compounds such as manure and compost. The throughput and resolution of the sequencing approach permitted to detect specific structural shifts at the level of individual microbial taxa that harbours a novel potential for managing the soil environment by means of promoting beneficial and suppressing detrimental organisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25350160 PMCID: PMC4409162 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Detailed management characteristics of the DOK long-term field experiment (Therwil, Switzerland)
| Farmyard manure and slurry (FYM) | — | Composted FYM | Rotted FYM | Stacked FYM | — |
| Mineral | — | — | Rock powder, magnesia | Synthetic (NPK) | Synthetic (NPK) |
| Inputs (kg ha−1 y−1) | |||||
| Dry matter | 0 | 3177±410 | 3303±494 | 3404±525 | 0 |
| Organic matter | 0 | 1818±243 | 2176±326 | 2514±419 | 0 |
| Ntot | 0 | 93±10 | 102±13 | 181±16 | 133±10 |
| Nmin | 0 | 27±3 | 34±5 | 120±10 | 133±10 |
| P | 0 | 18±3 | 24±4 | 36±3 | 36±2 |
| K | 0 | 220±22 | 189±22 | 269±22 | 262±19 |
| Ca | 0 | 150±25 | 125±20 | 159±38 | 238±70 |
| Mg | 0 | 27±4 | 25±4 | 34±5 | 34±6 |
| Weed control | Mechanical | Mechanical | Mechanical | Mechanical and herbicides | Mechanical and herbicides |
| Disease control | Indirect methods | Indirect methods | Indirect methods | Chemical (thresholds) | Chemical (thresholds) |
| Insect control | Plant extracts, biocontrol | Plant extracts, biocontrol | Plant extracts, biocontrol | Chemical (thresholds) | Chemical (thresholds) |
| Special treatments | Biodynamic preparations | Biodynamic preparations | CuSO4 in potatoes | Plant growth regulators | Plant growth regulators |
Abbreviations: BIODYN, manured biodynamic; BIOORG, manured bioorganic; Ca, calcium; CONFYM, manured conventional; CONMIN, minerally fertilized conventional; DOK, German abbreviation for dynamic, organic and conventional agricultural management; FYM, farmyard manure and slurry; K, potassium; Mg, magnesium; NOFERT, unfertilized biodynamic; Nmin, mineral nitrogen; Ntot, total nitrogen; P, phosphorus.
FYM was applied at 1.4 livestock units per hectare and year. FYM processing differed for the three stocked farming systems, that is, BIODYN (composted for 8–12 months), BIOORG (rotted for 3 months) and CONFYM (stacked for 4–8 months).
Average (mean±s.e.) annual nutrient amendments between 1992 and 2007 (nutrient input through plant residues are not included). Ntot in FYM was measured according to Kjeldahl and refers to the sum of organic and ammonium N. Nmin in FYM refers to ammonium N only.
Herbicides (1–2 treatments per year) and fungicides (2–3 treatments per year) were applied according to threshold values. Pest control was performed in potatoes on a regular basis and in winter wheat on a rare basis. Plant growth regulators (Cycocel, OHP Inc., Mainland, PA, USA) were routinely applied to winter wheat.
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tenebrionis (Novodor FC, Valent BioScience Corporation, Libertyville, IL, USA) was applied in all organic farming systems as biocontrol agent against potato beetle. No other microbial inoculants (for example, biocontrol, effective microorganisms) were used.
Biodynamic preparations (Reganold, 1995) P500 (cow manure fermented in a cow horn) and P501 (silica incubated in a cow horn) were amended at rates of 250 g and 4 g hectare and year, respectively. Composting additives were P502 (Achillea millefolium, L.), P503 (Matricaria recutita, L.), P504 (Urticaria dioica, L.), P505 (Quercus robur, L.), P506 (Taraxacum offcinale, Wiggers) and P507 (Valeriana officinalis, L.). A decoct of shave-grass (Equisetum arvense, L.) has been applied once during vegetational growth to wheat and potatoes as a protective agent against plant diseases at rates of 1.5 kg ha−1.
Figure 1Management effects on bacterial and fungal community structures. (a) PCO ordinations of Bray–Curtis similarities calculated based on relative OTU abundances showing major differences induced by farmyard manure application, that is, FYM (brown symbols) versus NoFYM (purple symbols), and year of sampling, that is, 2000 (triangles) versus 2007 (diamonds). The variance explained by each PCO axis is given in parentheses. Joint biplots show the correlation between richness or evenness and the ordinations scores on each PCO axis. Correlation coefficient r and level of significance (***P<0.001 and ns P>0.05) are provided. (b) CAP ordinations of bacterial and fungal communities maximizing discrimination among the different farming systems, that is, NOFERT (blue circles), CONMIN (pink triangles), BIODYN (green circles), BIOORG (dark green squares) and CONFYM (red triangles). These symbols (same symbol reflects same crop protection strategy) and colours (different farming systems) are used throughout the article where applicable. The canonical correlation (δ2) of each CAP axis, indicating the association strength between the multivariate data cloud and the hypothesis of differences between farming systems, is given in parentheses. The third axes (not shown) further separate BIOORG and BIODYN with δ2=0.52 and 0.55 for bacteria and fungi, respectively. The CAP reclassification rates (in percent) for each farming system are given in parentheses next to each cluster. The reclassification rate of the CAP model provides a quantitative estimate of the degree of discrimination among the systems achieved by the canonical axes. The traceQ_m'HQ_m statistic (sum of canonical eigenvalues) given in the plots tests the null hypothesis of no significant differences in multivariate location among farming systems and represents an overall test of rejecting the null hypothesis.
Effects of agricultural management effects on bacterial and fungal β-diversity
| P | P | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management (F4, 30) | ||||||
| Crop (F1, 30) | ||||||
| Management × crop (F4, 30) | 0.8 | 0.914 | Neg | 1.1 | 0.172 | 3.6 |
| Plot (F30, 30) | ||||||
| Time (F1, 30) | ||||||
| Time × management (F4, 30) | ||||||
| Time × crop (F1, 30) | ||||||
| Time × management × crop (F4, 30) | 1.0 | 0.610 | Neg | 1.2 | 0.065 | 5.6 |
Abbreviations: BIODYN, manured biodynamic; BIOORG, manured bioorganic; CONFYM, manured conventional; CONMIN, minerally fertilized conventional; Neg, negative; NOFERT, unfertilized biodynamic.
Effects of main factors and their interactions as assessed by multivariate permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; degrees of freedom for each factor and the corresponding error term are given in brackets). Main factors represent agricultural management system (NOFERT, CONMIN, BIODYN, BIOORG and CONFYM), crop (winter wheat and grass-clover), plot (nested in management and crop) and time (year of sampling, that is, 2000 and 2007). Values represent the pseudo-F ratio (F), the permutation-based level of significance (P) and the estimation of the variance component (VC). Values at P<0.05 are shown in bold. Negative variance components (neg) can result from underestimations of small or zero variances; therefore, variance components of the remaining factors were estimated according to Fletcher and Underwood (2002) by sequentially removing factors with negative components from the model.
Pairwise comparisons between farming systems. Values represent the univariate t-statistic (t) and the average between-group Bray–Curtis similarity (Øsim). The permutation-based level of significance was adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure (Padjust). Values at P<0.05 are shown in bold.
Effects of agricultural management on bacterial and fungal α-diversity
| Management (F4, 30) | 2.6 (0.055) | |||
| Crop (F1,30) | 0.3 (0.589) | 0.6 (0.445) | 0.0 (0.831) | 0.2 (0.696) |
| Management × crop (F4, 30) | 1.4 (0.258) | 0.3 (0.862) | 0.7 (0.586) | 0.3 (0.853) |
| Plot (F30, 30) | 1.5 (0.149) | 1.3 (0.212) | 1.0 (0.453) | 1.3 (0.263) |
| Time (F1, 30) | 0.8 (0.384) | |||
| Time × management (F4, 30) | 1.4 (0.243) | 0.9 (0.474) | 0.3 (0.850) | |
| Time × crop (F1, 30) | 0.8 (0.378) | 0.0 (0.945) | ||
| Time × management × crop (F4, 30) | 0.7 (0.569) | 0.4 (0.832) | 0.5 (0.731) | 1.1 (0.368) |
Abbreviations: BIODYN, manured biodynamic; BIOORG, manured bioorganic; CONFYM, manured conventional; CONMIN, minerally fertilized conventional; Evar, Smith–Wilson evenness index; NOFERT, unfertilized biodynamic; Sobs, observed richness.
Effects of main factors and their interactions were assessed by univariate permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; degrees of freedom for each factor and the corresponding error term are given in brackets). Main factors represent agricultural management system (NOFERT, CONMIN, BIODYN, BIOORG and CONFYM), crop (winter wheat and grass-clover), plot (nested in management and crop) and time (year of sampling, that is, 2000 and 2007). Values represent the pseudo-F ratio (F) and the level of significance (P). Values at P<0.05 are shown in bold.
Average richness and evenness (mean±s.e.; n=16) for each agricultural management system. Estimates are based on rarefied data sets (that is randomly subsampled to the same number of sequences per sample, that is, 2812 bacterial and 3292 fungal sequences). Different letters represent significant differences at P<0.05 with P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Figure 2Management effects on soil chemistry measured biannually between 2000 and 2008. PCO ordinations of Euclidean distances calculated based on z-transformed soil chemical parameters, that is, pH, Corg, Ntot, P, K and Mg. Joint biplots show the correlation between the soil chemical parameters and the ordinations scores on each PCO axis.
Soil chemical properties between 2000 and 2008 and the relationship between soil chemistry and bacterial or fungal β-diversity
| Management (F4, 30) | ||||||
| Crop (F4, 30) | 1.9 (0.112) | 3.0 (0.217) | ||||
| Management × crop (F16, 30) | 1.4 (0.138) | 0.4 (0.975) | 0.1 (1.000) | 1.7 (0.063) | ||
| Plot (F135, 30) | 1.6 (0.088) | 1.1 (0.376) | ||||
| Time (F2, 30) | ||||||
| Time × management (F8, 30) | 0.8 (0.574) |
Abbreviations: BIODYN, manured biodynamic; BIOORG, manured bioorganic; Ca, calcium; CONFYM, manured conventional; CONMIN, minerally fertilized conventional; Corg, organic carbon; DISTLM, distance-based linear modelling; K, potassium; Mg, magnesium; NOFERT, unfertilized biodynamic; Ntot, total nitrogen; P, phosphorus.
Effects of main factors and their interactions assessed by univariate permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; degrees of freedom for each factor and the error term are given in brackets). Main factors represent agricultural management system (NOFERT, CONMIN, BIODYN, BIOORG and CONFYM), crop (winter wheat and grass-clover), plot (nested in management and crop) and time (year of sampling, that is, 2000 and 2007). Because of the temporally shifted crop rotation, crop types were different in the different years, leading to a nonfactorial design. Therefore, interactions ‘ Time × crop' and ‘ Time × management × crop' could not be analysed and terms were pooled into the residuals. Values represent the pseudo-F ratio (F) and the level of significance (P). Values at P<0.05 are shown in bold.
Average soil chemical properties (mean±s.e.; n=40) for each agricultural management system. Different letters indicate significant differences assessed by PERMANOVA at P<0.05 with P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.
Distance-based linear modelling examining the relationship between soil chemistry and microbial β-diversity. Soil chemical data were derived from 2000 and 2006 (as proxy for 2007). The marginal test examines the relationship between β-diversity and each predictor variable individually, whereas the sequential test examines the relationship by sequentially fitting all predictors into the most parsimonious model. The sequential modelling was performed using a stepwise selection procedure and the adjusted R2 selection criterion. Values in table represent the estimation of the variance component (VC) and the level of significance (P).
Figure 3Taxonomic dendrograms of the detected bacterial and fungal communities showing the OTU distribution (excluding OTUs with <0.001% relative abundance) across the different taxonomic branches (colour coded by phylum). Nodes correspond to OTUs and node sizes correspond to their relative abundances (square root) in the data set. Edges (that is, lines connecting the nodes) represent the taxonomic path from the root, that is, bacteria or fungi (marked by yellow asterisks), to OTU level, and OTUs were placed at the level of the lowest possible assignment. The most abundant phyla are labelled including the total OTU number and relative abundance in parentheses. Red nodes correspond to OTUs that significantly (q<0.05) differed among farming systems, whereas white nodes represent insensitive OTUs. Supplementary Figure 2 shows the same taxonomic dendrograms with only the significant OTUs colour coded according to the system association information.
Figure 4Bipartite association network showing positive associations between the farming systems and the 628 significantly (q<0.05) associated OTUs. Node sizes represent relative abundance (square root) of the OTUs in the data sets. Edges represent the association patterns of individual OTUs with the farming systems. The edge-weighted spring-embedded algorithm pulled together OTUs with similar associations and systems with similar structure. OTUs associated with only one farming system are symbol and colour coded according to Figure 1. Diamond-shaped nodes represent OTUs associated with multiple farming systems. White nodes represent multisystem cross-combinations not falling into the same category with respect to either FYM application (FYM or no FYM) or farming regime (conventional or organic). Clusters are labelled as discussed in the text and marked in the Supplementary Data 2. Number of OTUs and relative abundances are provided for each cluster.
Figure 5Co-correlation networks calculated for the significantly (q<0.05) associated OTUs of the 10 most populated phyla (coded with different colours). Nodes correspond to OTUs and node sizes correspond to their relative abundances (square root) in the data set. Edges represent significant (q<0.01) negative (blue) or positive (red) Spearman's correlations between pairs of OTUs. The edge-weighted spring-embedded algorithm pulled together OTUs that were strongly co-correlated. Dense co-correlation networks indicate that all or most OTUs in this cluster showed either a similar (= positive correlations) or contrasting (=negative correlations) response. Network density (d) calculated for each network represents the number of significant co-correlations divided by all possible co-correlations, that is, higher density represents more uniform response. Symbol coding indicates the association with the different farming systems as provided in Figure 4. Clusters are labelled with the approximate association information with respect to the management regime (that is, farming systems or system combinations such as FYM or NoFYM). For closer inspection, the same network but OTUs colour coded with the system association information is provided in Supplementary Figure 3.