| Literature DB >> 28191504 |
Bin Ma1, Zhongmin Dai1, Haizhen Wang1, Melissa Dsouza2, Xingmei Liu1, Yan He1, Jianjun Wu1, Jorge L M Rodrigues3, Jack A Gilbert4, Philip C Brookes1, Jianming Xu1.
Abstract
The natural forest ecosystem in Eastern China, from tropical forest to boreal forest, has declined due to cropland development during the last 300 years, yet little is known about the historical biogeographic patterns and driving processes for the major domains of microorganisms along this continental-scale natural vegetation gradient. We predicted the biogeographic patterns of soil archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities across 110 natural forest sitesEntities:
Keywords: Eastern China; edaphic factors; forest soil; historical processes; microbial diversity; vegetation zone
Year: 2017 PMID: 28191504 PMCID: PMC5296412 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00174-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1 Locations and vegetation types of 110 sampling sites in China.
FIG 2 Composition profiles of archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities in metacommunities (pie charts) and different vegetation types (bar charts).
FIG 3 Shannon diversity index values for archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities. (a) Distributions of archaea, bacteria, and fungi in tropical seasonal forests (TSF), subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forests (SBEF), temperate deciduous broad-leaved forests (TDBF), and temperate mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests (TMCF) and relationships between (b) Shannon index values of archaeal community and total nitrogen (TN), (c) bacterial community and amorphous iron/free iron ratio (Feo/Fed ratio), and (d) fungal community and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The boxes show the distribution of values. The lower and upper hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles. The upper and lower whiskers extend from the hinge to the largest value no further than 1.5 times of the interquartile range from the upper and lower hinges, respectively. The outlier points are the data beyond the end of the whiskers.
FIG 4 Spatial mapping of Shannon index values for archaeal (a), bacterial (b), and fungal communities (c) across sampling regions using kriging interpolation.
FIG 5 Ordination of microbial communities. The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distances are represented using PCoA ordination for archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities in tropical seasonal forests (TSF), subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forests (SBEF), temperate deciduous broad-leaved forests (TDBF), and temperate mixed coniferous-broadleaf forests (TMCF).
FIG 6 Relationships between the Bray-Curtis similarities of archaeal, bacterial, and fungal communities and geographic distance. The lines represent the linear regression results. The shaded areas show the 95% confidence interval.
Mantel and partial Mantel test results for the correlation between community similarity and environmental and geographic distance
| Effect of | Controlling for | Mantel statistic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fungi | ||||
| Geographic distance | −0.015 (0.657) | 0.059 (0.012*) | 0.055 (0.051) | |
| Environmental variables | −0.044 (0.738) | 0.010 (0.398) | 0.109 (0.010**) | |
| Geographic distance | Environmental variables | 0.012 (0.370) | 0.054 (0.011*) | 0.056 (0.016*) |
| Environmental variables | Geographic distance | −0.043 (0.738) | 0.026 (0.234) | 0.012 (0.314) |
Statistical significance was tested based on 9,999 permutations. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
FIG 7 Correlations between dominant microbial OTUs and edaphic variables. Colors indicate the Spearman’s correlation coefficients, as shown in the key. Dominant OTUs uncorrelated with any edaphic variables are not displayed. The order, family, and genus names for the corresponding OTUs are shown to the left of the grids; “NA” indicates unclear classification at the corresponding taxonomic level. pH, soil pH; HA, humic acid; FA, fulvic acid; HA/FA ratio, humic acid/fulvic acid ratio; TN, total nitrogen; TDN, total dissolved nitrogen; OC, organic carbon; DOC dissolved organic matter; C/N ratio, carbon/nitrogen ratio; AK, available potassium; Clay, proportion of clay; Silt, proportion of silt; Sand, proportion of sand; Ald, free aluminum; Alo, amorphous aluminum; Feo, amorphous iron; Fed, free iron; Feo/Fed ratio, amorphous iron/free iron ratio.