Rebecca E Drenovsky1, Kerri L Steenwerth2, Louise E Jackson3, Kate M Scow3. 1. Biology Department, John Carroll University, 20700 North Park Boulevard, University Heights, OH 44118 USA. 2. USDA/ARS, Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, CA 95616, USA. 3. Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Abstract
AIM: Although patterns are emerging for macroorganisms, we have limited understanding of the factors determining soil microbial community composition and productivity at large spatial extents. The overall objective of this study was to discern the drivers of microbial community composition at the extent of biogeographical provinces and regions. We hypothesized that factors associated with land use and climate would drive soil microbial community composition and biomass. LOCATION: Great Basin Province, Desert Province and California Floristic Province, California, USA. METHODS: Using phospholipid fatty acid analysis, we compared microbial communities across eight land-use types sampled throughout the State of California, USA (n = 1117). RESULTS: The main factor driving composition and microbial biomass was land-use type, especially as related to water availability and disturbance. Dry soils were more enriched in Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, and wetter soils were more enriched in Gram-positive, anaerobic and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Microbial biomass was lowest in ecosystems with the wettest and driest soils. Disturbed soils had less fungal and more Gram-positive bacterial biomass than wildland soils. However, some factors known to influence microbial communities, such as soil pH and specific plant taxa, were not important here. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Distinct microbial communities were associated with land-use types and disturbance at the regional extent. Overall, soil water availability was an important determinant of soil microbial community composition. However, because of the inclusion of managed and irrigated agricultural ecosystems, the effect of precipitation was not significant. Effects of environmental and management factors, such as flooding, tillage and irrigation, suggest that agricultural management can have larger effects on soil microbial communities than elevation and precipitation gradients.
AIM: Although patterns are emerging for macroorganisms, we have limited understanding of the factors determining soil microbial community composition and productivity at large spatial extents. The overall objective of this study was to discern the drivers of microbial community composition at the extent of biogeographical provinces and regions. We hypothesized that factors associated with land use and climate would drive soil microbial community composition and biomass. LOCATION: Great Basin Province, Desert Province and California Floristic Province, California, USA. METHODS: Using phospholipid fatty acid analysis, we compared microbial communities across eight land-use types sampled throughout the State of California, USA (n = 1117). RESULTS: The main factor driving composition and microbial biomass was land-use type, especially as related to water availability and disturbance. Dry soils were more enriched in Gram-negative bacteria and fungi, and wetter soils were more enriched in Gram-positive, anaerobic and sulphate-reducing bacteria. Microbial biomass was lowest in ecosystems with the wettest and driest soils. Disturbed soils had less fungal and more Gram-positive bacterial biomass than wildland soils. However, some factors known to influence microbial communities, such as soil pH and specific plant taxa, were not important here. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Distinct microbial communities were associated with land-use types and disturbance at the regional extent. Overall, soil water availability was an important determinant of soil microbial community composition. However, because of the inclusion of managed and irrigated agricultural ecosystems, the effect of precipitation was not significant. Effects of environmental and management factors, such as flooding, tillage and irrigation, suggest that agricultural management can have larger effects on soil microbial communities than elevation and precipitation gradients.
Entities:
Keywords:
California; PLFA; disturbance; microbial biomass; soil microbial community; water
Authors: Ana Lucía Córdova-Kreylos; Yiping Cao; Peter G Green; Hyun-Min Hwang; Kathryn M Kuivila; Michael G Lamontagne; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Patricia A Holden; Kate M Scow Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jennifer B Hughes Martiny; Brendan J M Bohannan; James H Brown; Robert K Colwell; Jed A Fuhrman; Jessica L Green; M Claire Horner-Devine; Matthew Kane; Jennifer Adams Krumins; Cheryl R Kuske; Peter J Morin; Shahid Naeem; Lise Ovreås; Anna-Louise Reysenbach; Val H Smith; James T Staley Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Robert H Findlay; Christine Yeates; Meredith A J Hullar; David A Stahl; Louis A Kaplan Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Frank Reith; Joel Brugger; Carla M Zammit; Adrienne L Gregg; Katherine C Goldfarb; Gary L Andersen; Todd Z DeSantis; Yvette M Piceno; Eoin L Brodie; Zhenmei Lu; Zhili He; Jizhong Zhou; Steven A Wakelin Journal: ISME J Date: 2012-06-07 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: D Bru; A Ramette; N P A Saby; S Dequiedt; L Ranjard; C Jolivet; D Arrouays; L Philippot Journal: ISME J Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Frank Reith; Carla M Zammit; Rebecca Pohrib; Adrienne L Gregg; Steven A Wakelin Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Jennifer M DeBruyn; Lauren T Nixon; Mariam N Fawaz; Amy M Johnson; Mark Radosevich Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Nicholas P C Horrocks; Arne Hegemann; Stéphane Ostrowski; Henry Ndithia; Mohammed Shobrak; Joseph B Williams; Kevin D Matson; B I Tieleman Journal: Oecologia Date: 2014-11-11 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: S Terrat; S Dequiedt; W Horrigue; M Lelievre; C Cruaud; N P A Saby; C Jolivet; D Arrouays; P-A Maron; L Ranjard; N Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré Journal: Heredity (Edinb) Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 3.821