| Literature DB >> 32887516 |
Tom van der Meer1,2, Arno Verlee3, Patrick Willems1,2, Francis Impens4,5,6, Kris Gevaert5,6, Christa Testerink7, Christian V Stevens3, Frank Van Breusegem1,2, Pavel Kerchev1,2,8,9.
Abstract
Alterations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels have a profound impact on numerous signaling cascades orchestrating plant growth, development, and stress signaling, including programmed cell death. To expand the repertoire of known molecular mechanisms implicated in H2O2 signaling, we performed a forward chemical screen to identify small molecules that could alleviate the photorespiratory-induced cell death phenotype of Arabidopsisthaliana mutants lacking H2O2-scavenging capacity by peroxisomal catalase2. Here, we report the characterization of pakerine, an m-sulfamoyl benzamide from the sulfonamide family. Pakerine alleviates the cell death phenotype of cat2 mutants exposed to photorespiration-promoting conditions and delays dark-induced senescence in wild-type Arabidopsis leaves. By using a combination of transcriptomics, metabolomics, and affinity purification, we identified abnormal inflorescence meristem 1 (AIM1) as a putative protein target of pakerine. AIM1 is a 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase involved in fatty acid β-oxidation that contributes to jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) biosynthesis. Whereas intact JA biosynthesis was not required for pakerine bioactivity, our results point toward a role for β-oxidation-dependent SA production in the execution of H2O2-mediated cell death.Entities:
Keywords: H2O2 signaling; abnormal inflorescence meristem 1; catalase2-deficient Arabidopsis; chemical genetics; photorespiration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32887516 PMCID: PMC7563276 DOI: 10.3390/cells9092026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
Figure 1Strategy to identify small molecules that alleviate the photorespiratory phenotype of catalase-deficient plants together with chemical structures of two hit compounds. (A) Schematic depiction of the forward chemical screed used to isolate small molecules that attenuate photosystem II (PSII) maximum efficiency (Fv’/Fm’) decrease in cat2-2 mutants plants exposed to photorespiratory stress (sealing plates airtight with Parafilm and transfer to continuous light). In total, 10,000 chemicals from the DIVERSet screening library were tested in 50 µM concentration. Shown are representative color-coded Fv’/Fm’ images (black (0.0) to purple (1.0)) before and after chemical addition and exposure to photorespiratory stress. (B) Chemical structures of two of the hit compounds identified in the forward chemical screen. (C) Effect of different concentrations of pakerine on the photorespiratory phenotype of cat2-2 mutant plants. Bright-field (BF) and color-coded Fv’/Fm’ (PSII) images (upper panel) together with quantitative Fv’/Fm’ data (lower panel) from seven-day-old seedlings treated with pakerine and exposed to photorespiratory stress for seven days. Control plants were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Data points represent means of eight biological replicates ± standard error (SE). Asterisks indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with least significant difference (LSD) post hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Rearrangement of gene expression in cat2-2 plants upon photorespiratory stress in the presence of pakerine. (A) Multidimensional scaling plot of transcriptome profiles of cat2-2 mutant plants treated with pakerine or DMSO before and after exposure to photorespiratory stress. “DMSO”: DMSO-treated plants under control conditions; “Pakerine”: pakerine-treated plants under control conditions; “Stress + Pakerine”: pakerine-treated plants exposed to photorespiratory stress; “Stress”: DMSO-treated plants exposed to photorespiratory stress. (B) Venn diagram depicting the overlap between differentially expressed genes (DEGs; |Log2 fold change (FC)| > 1, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.01) in plants exposed to photorespiratory stress (“Stress”), pakerine-treated plants (“Pakerine”), and pakerine-treated plants exposed to photorespiratory stress (“Stress + Pakerine”) against mock-treated plants (“DMSO”). (C) Hierarchical average clustering of 3260 DEGs identified in at least one out of the three pairwise comparisons described in Figure 2B. (D) Heat map of 73 transcripts that responded to photorespiratory stress in a pakerine-specific manner according to two-way (pakerine × photorespiratory stress) ANOVA.
Figure 3Effect of pakerine on the growth of wild-type Arabidopsis. (A) Representative images of seven-day-old seedlings grown vertically on MS medium supplemented with different pakerine concentrations. Control plants were grown on medium supplemented with DMSO. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Quantification of the primary root length of seedlings (n = 36) grown on pakerine as described in (A). Asterisks depict significantly longer (*) or shorter (**) roots compared to DMSO control according to one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05). Error bars represent SE. (C) Representative images of rosettes of 11-day-old plants grown on half MS medium supplemented with different pakerine concentrations. Scale bar = 0.5 cm. (D) Quantification of the projected rosette area of plants (n = 36) grown as described in (C). Asterisks depict significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05). Error bars represent SE. (E) Biomass of three-week-old plants grown on half MS medium supplemented with 1 μM pakerine. Control plants were grown on medium supplemented with DMSO. Box plots represent data from 32 different observations. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to Student’s t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Transcriptome and metabolite changes triggered by pakerine in wild-type Arabidopsis. (A) Differentially regulated metabolites (|FC| ≥ 1.5; p ≤ 0.05) extracted from three-week-old plants grown in the presence of 1 μM pakerine. Controls were exposed to DMSO. (B) Heat map of differentially expressed transcripts (|log2 FC| ≥ 1; adjusted p ≤ 0.05) in 10-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings treated with 5 μM pakerine for 24 h. Controls received mock treatment with DMSO. (C) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of differentially expressed transcripts depicted in (B). Shown are two significantly enriched clusters (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Pakerine delays dark-induced senescence in wild-type Arabidopsis leaves. (A) Representative images of detached leaves incubated on liquid MS media supplemented with pakerine or DMSO for seven days in darkness. (B) Total chlorophyll content of leaves treated as in (A). Data points represent means of 12 individual leaves ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Structure–activity relationship (SAR) analysis of pakerine. (A) Original chemical structure of pakerine. Functional groups that were modified in the synthesized analogues are highlighted in blue. (B) Analogues with single substitution in the original structure. (C) Analogues with two substitutions in the original structure. The active concentrations at which the analogues attenuated Fv’/Fm’ decline in cat2-2 mutants exposed to photorespiratory stress are shown below each structure.
Figure 7Abnormal inflorescence meristem 1 (AIM1) is a putative protein target of pakerine. (A) Chemical structures used for affinity purification. The functionalized pakerine analogue SA004 fused to a polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker and coupled to a biotin tag at the end of the PEG chain (SA004–PEG–Biotin) was used to fish out putative protein interactions. A construct consisting of biotin attached to PEG (Biotin–PEG) was used to eliminated background proteins interacting with the matrix and the linker. (B) Proteins significantly enriched after affinity purification. Protein isolates from Arabidopsis cell cultures (n = 3) were incubated with SA004–PEG–Biotin and significantly enriched proteins in comparison to Biotin–PEG controls were identified (log2 label-free quantification intensity (LFQ) > 3.5, p < 0.05).
Figure 8Pakerine does not alleviate dark-induced senescence in the absence of AIM1. (A) Representative images of detached aim1-2 and wild-type Arabidopsis leaves incubated on liquid MS medium supplemented with pakerine (10 μM) or DMSO (control) for seven days in darkness. (B) Total chlorophyll content of leaves treated as in (A). Data points represent means of 12 individual leaves ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05).
Figure 9Jasmonic acid (JA) signaling is not required for pakerine function. (A) Representative bright-field (BF) and color-coded Fv’/Fm’ (PSII) images of cat2-2 jar1-1 and cat2-2 aos double mutants treated with 10 μM pakerine and exposed to photorespiratory stress together with mock-treated controls. (B) Quantitative Fv’/Fm’ data from plants treated as in (A). Data points represent means of eight individual measurements ± SE. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with LSD post hoc test (p < 0.05).