Literature DB >> 3283499

Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.

E R McVeigh1, M J Bronskill, R M Henkelman.   

Abstract

A new method of optimizing MRI data acquisition protocols is presented. Tissues are modeled with probability density functions (PDFs) of tissue parameter values (such as T1, T2). The imaging data acquisition process is modeled as a mapping from a tissue parameter space to a signal strength space. Tissue parameter PDFs are mapped to signal strength PDFs for each tissue in a clinical problem. The efficacy of an MRI protocol is evaluated using the methods of statistical decision analysis applied to the signal strength PDFs, including the propagation of noise. This procedure evaluates the ability to discriminate different tissues based on the signal strengths produced with the protocol. The model can incorporate an arbitrary number of tissues, parameters, and pulse sequences in the protocol. The multivariate nature of MRI and the observed broad distribution of tissue parameter values makes this model more appropriate for optimizing data acquisition protocols than methods which maximize the signal-difference-to-noise ratio between discrete values of the tissue parameters. It is shown that these two methods may calculate different optimal protocols. The method can be used to optimize data acquisition for quantitative computer-based tissue classification, as well as imaging. Data acquisition and image processing philosophies are discussed in light of the method.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3283499      PMCID: PMC2396265          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910060310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  28 in total

1.  Optimal filtering of radiographic image sequences using simultaneous diagonalization.

Authors:  J V Miller; J P Windham; S C Kwatra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The utility of principal component analysis for the image display of brain lesions. A preliminary, comparative study.

Authors:  U Schmiedl; D A Ortendahl; A S Mark; I Berry; L Kaufman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Errors in T2 estimation using multislice multiple-echo imaging.

Authors:  A P Crawley; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Combining multiple-imaging techniques for in vivo pathology: a quantitative method for coupling new imaging modalities.

Authors:  R Gordon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Analytical tools for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D A Ortendahl; N Hylton; L Kaufman; J C Watts; L E Crooks; C M Mills; D D Stark
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  The technical characteristics of matched filtering in digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  S J Riederer; A L Hall; J K Maier; N J Pelc; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The dependence of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) image contrast on intrinsic and pulse sequence timing parameters.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J R MacFall; G H Glover; N Grigsby; V Haughton; J Johanson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Spin lattice relaxation time measurements in two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: corrections for plane selection and pulse sequence.

Authors:  B R Rosen; I L Pykett; T J Brady
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  A strategy for magnetic resonance imaging of the head: results of a semi-empirical model. Part II.

Authors:  R T Droege; S N Wiener; M S Rzeszotarski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Isosignal contours and signal gradients as an aid to choosing MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  D Kurtz; A Dwyer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.826

View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.