Literature DB >> 2179660

Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

E R McVeigh1, R M Henkelman, M J Bronskill.   

Abstract

A method for evaluating the sensitivity of MRI protocols to changes in an arbitrary number of tissue parameters over a broad range of parameter values is presented. This analysis is useful for choosing an optimal basis set of images for either a "survey" protocol or tissue segmentation algorithms. A survey protocol is required when searching for a lesion of unknown type or location. Segmentation requires unique signal signatures for tissues that may cover a broad range of tissue parameter values. Data acquisition is modeled as a mapping of a domain of tissue parameter values into a signal manifold in a signal strength space defined by the MRI protocol. The efficacy of the protocol is evaluated by investigating the characteristics of the signal manifold. A figure of merit which maximizes the probability of discriminating each point in the domain of tissue parameters from all others is developed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2179660      PMCID: PMC2169203          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910130202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  Optimal filtering of radiographic image sequences using simultaneous diagonalization.

Authors:  J V Miller; J P Windham; S C Kwatra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  The utility of principal component analysis for the image display of brain lesions. A preliminary, comparative study.

Authors:  U Schmiedl; D A Ortendahl; A S Mark; I Berry; L Kaufman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Sampling time effects on signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in spin-echo MRI.

Authors:  R E Hendrick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Toward an automated analysis system for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. I. Efficient pulse sequences for simultaneous T1-T2 imaging.

Authors:  M O'Donnell; J C Gore; W J Adams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Comparative efficiency of different pulse sequences in MR imaging.

Authors:  I R Young; M Burl; G M Bydder
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Analytical tools for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D A Ortendahl; N Hylton; L Kaufman; J C Watts; L E Crooks; C M Mills; D D Stark
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The technical characteristics of matched filtering in digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  S J Riederer; A L Hall; J K Maier; N J Pelc; D R Enzmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The dependence of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) image contrast on intrinsic and pulse sequence timing parameters.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; J R MacFall; G H Glover; N Grigsby; V Haughton; J Johanson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  A strategy for magnetic resonance imaging of the head: results of a semi-empirical model. Part II.

Authors:  R T Droege; S N Wiener; M S Rzeszotarski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Isosignal contours and signal gradients as an aid to choosing MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  D Kurtz; A Dwyer
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.