Literature DB >> 6530915

The dependence of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) image contrast on intrinsic and pulse sequence timing parameters.

F W Wehrli, J R MacFall, G H Glover, N Grigsby, V Haughton, J Johanson.   

Abstract

In Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) the image pixel value is governed by at least three major intrinsic parameters: the spin density N (H), the spin-lattice relaxation time T1, and the spin-spin relaxation time T2. The extent to which the signal is weighted toward one or several parameters is related to the history of the spin system preceding detection. On the simplifying, though not generally warranted assumption that the spin density does not vary significantly in soft tissues, relative tissue contrast can be predicted quantitatively provided the relaxation times are known. Signal intensities and contrast were computed on the basis of the Bloch equations and experimentally determined relaxation times as a function of pulse timing parameters and the data compared with those in images recorded at 0.5T field strength. Significant deviations from the equal density hypothesis were found for gray and white substance. Notably partial saturation but also spin echo and inversion-recovery images are not in full accordance with predictions made on the basis of relaxation times alone.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6530915     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(84)90119-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  7 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging simulator: a teaching tool for radiology.

Authors:  D Rundle; S Kishore; S Seshadri; F Wehrli
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A model for MRI contrast enhancement using T1 agents.

Authors:  E T Ahrens; U Rothbächer; R E Jacobs; S E Fraser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Phase and sensitivity of receiver coils in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 6.  Basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging--an update.

Authors:  A L Scherzinger; W R Hendee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-12

7.  A novel nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging method for measuring the water front penetration rate in hydrophilic polymer matrix capsule plugs and its role in drug release.

Authors:  M Ashraf; V L Iuorno; D Coffin-Beach; C A Evans; L L Augsburger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.200

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.