Literature DB >> 3600253

The utility of principal component analysis for the image display of brain lesions. A preliminary, comparative study.

U Schmiedl, D A Ortendahl, A S Mark, I Berry, L Kaufman.   

Abstract

Principal component analysis (PCA), a common tool from multivariate statistical analysis, has been implemented into the computer display system of a MR imaging device. PCA allows the calculation of images in which the information in a defined region of interest inherent in the basic acquired images is condensed. PCA image calculation has been applied to acquired MR studies of 13 patients with brain lesions. The appearance of the brain lesions on the resultant PCA images was scored in comparison to the acquired images before and after administration of Gd-DTPA as well as to other calculated images including T1, T2, hydrogen density, and contrast-optimized images. The conspicuity of a lesion and the number of distinguishable components within a lesion were slightly superior on PCA than on the acquired images. PCA is an analytical tool for MR imaging that should be helpful in revealing information that is inherent in, but not readily visible on, standard acquired MR images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3600253     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910040508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of survey protocols for MRI.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; R M Henkelman; M J Bronskill
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.

Authors:  E R McVeigh; M J Bronskill; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  MR imaging of cerebral tumors: state of the art and work in progress.

Authors:  H P Higer; P Pedrosa; M Schuth
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  PCATMIP: enhancing signal intensity in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  V M Pai; S Rapacchi; P Kellman; P Croisille; H Wen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High dynamic range processing for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andy H Hung; Taiyang Liang; Preeti A Sukerkar; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.