| Literature DB >> 32781533 |
Salman Ahmed1, Haroon Khan2, Michael Aschner3, Hamed Mirzae4, Esra Küpeli Akkol5, Raffaele Capasso6.
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most extreme medical conditions in both developing and developed countries around the world, causing millions of deaths each year. Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy are key for treatment approaches, but both have numerous adverse health effects. Furthermore, the resistance of cancerous cells to anticancer medication leads to treatment failure. The rising burden of cancer overall requires novel efficacious treatment modalities. Natural medications offer feasible alternative options against malignancy in contrast to western medication. Furanocoumarins' defensive and restorative impacts have been observed in leukemia, glioma, breast, lung, renal, liver, colon, cervical, ovarian, and prostate malignancies. Experimental findings have shown that furanocoumarins activate multiple signaling pathways, leading to apoptosis, autophagy, antioxidant, antimetastatic, and cell cycle arrest in malignant cells. Additionally, furanocoumarins have been shown to have chemo preventive and chemotherapeutic synergistic potential when used in combination with other anticancer drugs. Here, we address different pathways which are activated by furanocoumarins and their therapeutic efficacy in various tumors. Ideally, this review will trigger interest in furanocoumarins and their potential efficacy and safety as a cancer lessening agents.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; autophagy; cell cycle arrest; furanocoumarin; metastasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32781533 PMCID: PMC7460698 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Anticancer effects of furanocoumarins in the different reported studies.
| Furanocoumarins | Dietary Sources [ | In Vitro | In Vivo | Anticancer Mechanisms | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cell Lines | Cytotoxic Concentration | Experimental Model | Dose | ||||
| Parsnip | HeLa and SiHa | IC30 = 27.8 µM; IC50 = 38.2 µM | — | — | Atg3,7 and 12-5 | [ | |
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50~ 50 µmol | — | — | NF-κB inactivation G2/M phase arrest, cyclinB1 | [ | ||
| SH-SY5Y | IC50 = 49.56 μM | — | — | caspase 3,9 | [ | ||
| Caki | IC50 = angelicin (50–100 μM) and TRAIL (50 ng/mL) | — | — | caspase 3 | [ | ||
| HepG2 and Huh-7 | IC50 = 90 ± 6.565 (HepG2); 60 ± 4.256 μM (Huh-7) | — | — | PI3K/Akt inhibition, Bcl-2 | [ | ||
| — | — | Mouse liver xenograft model (BALB/c-nu/nu mice) | 50 mg/kg (16 days) | cancer cell growth | [ | ||
| Carrot, cumin, dill, fig, grapefruit, lemon, lime, orange, parsley, parsnip | A549, H1299 | IC50 = 50–100 μM | — | — | EMT inhibition, JNK | [ | |
| U87 and U251 | IC50 = 2–10 μM | — | — | NF-κB inactivation, MMP9 | [ | ||
| HT-1080 | IC50 = 5–50 μM | — | — | NF-κB inactivation; MMP2, MMP9 | [ | ||
| HT-29 and RKO | IC50 = 12.5 µM | — | — | caspase-3,8,9 | [ | ||
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50 = 50 μM | — | — | G2/M phase arrest, cyclinA | [ | ||
| — | — | Mouse lung xenograft model (BALB/c nude mice) | 100 mg/kg (18 days) | ↓ cancer cell growth | [ | ||
| Anise, carrot, caraway, celeriac, celery, coriander, cumin, dill, fig, grapefruit, lemon, lime, orange, parsley, parsnip, turnip | DLD-1 and LoVo | IC50 = 30 and 50 μM | — | — | G2/M phase arrest, cyclin E | [ | |
| MCF-7 | IC50 = 50 μM | — | — | G1-phase phase arrest, P53 | [ | ||
| Hep-G2 | IC50 = 25–50 mM | — | — | G2/M phase arrest, Cdk1 inhibition | [ | ||
| IC50 = 25–100 μM | — | — | G2-M phase arrest, P53 | [ | |||
| A549 (NSCLC) | 79.1 ± 2.8% | — | — | G1-phase arrest, P53 | [ | ||
| NCI-H460 | 74.5 ± 3.1% | — | — | ||||
| MCF7 and ZR-75 | 50 μM | — | — | PTEN | [ | ||
| HepG2 | 50 mM | — | — | PI3K/AKT inhibition, LXR (α and β) | [ | ||
| — | — | NDEA induced liver cancer | 25 and 50 mg/kg (14 days) | ↓ cancer cell growth | |||
| Carrot, grapefruit, lemon, lime, parsley, parsnip | MCF-7 | IC50 = 52.2 µM | — | — | G1-phase arrest; caspase 3,9 | [ | |
| Lemon | HCT-15 | IC50 = 18.1 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ↓ cell viability | [ | |
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50 =14.3 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | IC50 = 20.2 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | IC50 = 21.2 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| XF498 | IC50 = 28.4 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| Lemon | HCT-15 | IC50 = 7.0 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ↓ cell viability | [ | |
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50 = 6.8 ± 0.1 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | IC50 = 8.8 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | IC50 = 8.8 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| XF498 | IC50 = 7.2 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| A549 | 0.25 mM | — | — | NF-κB inactivation | [ | ||
| Fructus liquidambaris | A549 | IC50 = 65.28 ± 5.36 μM | — | — | P53 | [ | |
| Lime, parsley | SGC-7901 | IC50 = 62.6 μM | — | — | promoting G1-phase arrest; PI3K/Akt/m-TOR signaling | [ | |
| HT-29 | IC50 = 78 µM | — | — | G1-phase arrest; P53 | [ | ||
| HL-60 | 10 μM | — | — | caspase 3,9 | [ | ||
| H23 | 10 μg/mL | — | — | P53 | [ | ||
| HeLa | 200 μM for imperatorin and 5 μM for cisplatin | — | — | Hsp27 and Hsp72 | [ | ||
| HCT116 | 150 μM | mTOR | [ | ||||
| HCT-15 | IC50 = 19.4 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ↓ cell viability | [ | ||
| A549 | IC50 = 16.4 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | IC50 =13.7 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | IC50 = 14.5 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| XF498 | IC50 = 12.3 ± 0.5 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| Lime, parsley | SGC-7901 | IC50 = 18.75 μg·mL−1 | SGC-7901 cell-induced xenograft model (mice) | 10 mg/kg (20 days) | G1-phase arrest; caspase 3,9 | [ | |
| DU145 | 100 µM | — | — | G1-phase arrest | [ | ||
| HCT-15 | IC50 = 5.6 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ↓ cell viability | [ | ||
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50 = 12.2 ± 0.4 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | IC50 = 6.8 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | IC50 = 9.9 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| XF498 | IC50 = 10.7 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| Broad bean, blackberry, raspberry | U937 | IC50 = 40 µM | Mice | 30mg/kg (30 days) | Bax | [ | |
| Anise, carrot, caraway celeriac, celery, cumin, dill, grapefruit, lemon, lime, parsley, parsnip, turnip | HepG2 | 100 µM | — | — | Bax/Bcl-2 ratio | [ | |
| SK-N-AS and SW620 | IC50 = 56.3 µM for SK-N-AS and 88.5 µM for SW620 | — | — | Caspase-3,8,9 | [ | ||
| Lime, parsley | L5178Y (mouse T-cell lymphoma cells) | IC50 = 40.33 ± 0.63 µM | — | — | caspase 3,9 | [ | |
| HCT-15 | IC50 = 3.4 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ↓ cell viability | [ | ||
| A549 (NSCLC) | IC50 = 9.5 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-OV-3 | IC50 = 19.3 ± 0.3 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| SK-MEL-2 | IC50 = 16.5 ± 0.2 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| XF498 | IC50 = 16.1 ± 0.5 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| A549, HCT-15, SK-MEL-2, SK-OV-3, XF498 | IC50 > 30 μg·mL−1 | — | — | ||||
| Carrot, celeriac, celery, cilantro, cumin, dill, fig, grapefruit, lemon, lime, parsley, parsnip | KBv200 | 75.3% (80 μg·mL−1) | — | — | NF-κB inactivation G1/S phase arrest, c-FLIP, and IAP inhibition | [ | |
| K562 | 92.4% (80 μg·mL−1) | — | — | ||||
| MCF-7 | 17.32 ± 4.28% (8 μg·mL−1) | — | — | G1/G0 phase arrest | [ | ||
| SMMC7721 | 40 μM | — | — | G1 phase arrest, cyclin E | [ | ||
| MCF-7/ADR | IC10 = 8 μg/mL | P-gp efflux function inhibition | [ | ||||
| IC50 = 25.59 ± 1.74 µg/mL | P-gp ATPase activity inhibition | [ | |||||
| 43.0 µM | EMT inhibition | ||||||
| 107.5 µM | G0/G1 phase arrest | ||||||
| Parsnip | A549 | 50 μM | — | — | NF-κB inactivation | [ | |
| Lime | SW480 | 25 µM (67%) | — | — | caspase-3,8 | [ | |
Human cancer cell lines: A549 (NSCLC), NCI-H460 (NSCLC), H23, and H1299 = lung cancer; Caki = renal carcinoma; DLD-1, LoVo, HCT-15, HT-29, HCT116, RKO, SW480 and SW620 = colorectal cancer; DU145 = prostate cancer; HL-60 = promyelocytic leukemia; HeLa and SiHa = cervical cancer; HepG2, Huh-7 and SMMC7721 = liver carcinoma; HT-1080 = fibrosarcoma; KBM-5, K562 = human chronic myeloid leukaemia; KBv200 = oral squamous carcinoma; MCF7 SKBR-3 and ZR-75 = breast cancer; SH-SY5Y and SK-N-AS = neuroblastoma; SK-MEL-2 = melanoma; SK-OV-3 = ovarian cancer; SGC-7901 = gastric cancer cell; U937 = leukemia; U87 and U251 = glioma cells; XF498 = CNS solid tumor; MCF-7/ADR = doxorubicin resistant derivatives of MCF-7 cells overexpressing P-gp; ↑ = increase; ↓ = decrease.
Figure 1A schema of different molecular mechanisms that are targeted by furanocoumarin. It shows several molecular singling pathways modulation that leads to autophagy, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Black lines: induce, and red lines: inhibit.
Figure 2A schema of anti-angiogenesis effects of furanocoumarin. FC via activation/inhibition of a sequences of cellular and molecular pathways exerts its anti-angiogenesis effects. Black lines: induce, and red lines: inhibit.