| Literature DB >> 35003288 |
Mi Kyung Lim1,2, Ju Yeon Kim2, Jeongho Jeong2, Eun Hye Han2, Sang Ho Lee2, Soyeon Lee2, Sun-Don Kim3, Jinu Lee1.
Abstract
Aster glehni, a traditional plant on Ulleung Island in the Republic of Korea, has been recognized for its multiple medicinal properties. However, potential toxicity and safety analyses of A. glehni have not been previously investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the safety profile of ethanolic extract of A. glehni leaves and stems (EAG) in terms of genotoxicity and subchronic oral animal toxicity under OECD guidelines and GLP conditions. Toxicological assessments were performed at doses of 1,250, 2,500, and 5,000 mg/kg/day in a 13-week oral repeated-dose toxicity study of EAG in male and female SD rats. In addition, an Ames test, an in vitro mammalian chromosomal aberration test, and a micronucleus test were performed. No toxicological changes in clinical signs, body weights, water and food consumption, urinalysis, hematology, clinical biochemistry, gross findings, and histopathological examinations were observed in subchronic oral animal toxicity. In addition, EAG gave negative results when evaluated using in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests. In conclusion, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of EAG was considered to be 5,000 mg/kg/day, and no target organs were identified in both sexes of rats. EAG was also classified as nonmutagenic and nonclastogenic in genotoxicity testing. Collectively, these results show a lack of general toxicity and genotoxicity for EAG that supports clinical work for development as a herbal medicine.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003288 PMCID: PMC8736694 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1018101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Amino acid composition of EAG.
| Amino acida | Tyr | Gly | Ser | Ala | Glu | Lys | Leu | Met | Val | Arg | Asp | Ile | Thr | Phe | Pro | His | Cys | Trp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG | ND | 225.0 | 183.4 | 161.9 | 355.0 | 47.1 | 193.7 | 19.3 | 141.1 | 53.6 | 292.6 | 117.2 | 154.6 | 146.2 | 203.7 | 39.5 | 96.9 | 13.0 |
| EAG | ND | 53.9 | 78.3 | 67.9 | 197.6 | 7.1 | 84.6 | ND | 41.3 | 26.7 | 380.1 | 46.4 | 60.4 | 43.0 | 616.9 | 16.7 | 28.2 | 10.9 |
aUnit: mg/100 g, Tyr, tyrosine; Gly, glycine; Ser, serine; Ala, alanine; Glu, glutamic acid; Lys, lysine; Leu, leucine; Met, methionine; Val, valine; Arg, arginine; Asp, aspartic acid; Ile, isoleucine; Thr, threonine; Phe, phenylalanine; Pro, proline; His, histidine; Cys, cysteine; Trp, tryptophan; ND, not detected; AG, ethanolic leaf extract of Aster glehni; and EAG, ethanolic leaf and stem extract of Aster glehni.
Figure 1Effect of ethanolic extract of A. glehni on body weights in SD rats. (a) Mean body weights of male rats and (b) mean body weight of female rats treated with EAG for 2 weeks. (c) Mean body weights of male rats and (d) mean body weight of female rats treated with EAG for 13 weeks. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 9–10 per group). Significant difference at P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01 levels compared with the negative control.
Urinalysis of male and female SD rats in the 13-week repeated oral toxicity study of EAG.
| Tests | Result | EAG (mg/kg/day) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||||||
| 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | ||
| No. of animals examined | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| GLU | Negative | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| BIL | Negative | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||
| KET | Negative | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Trace | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||||
| SG | ≤1.005 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 1.010 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| 1.015 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.020 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1∗∗ | |
|
| |||||||||
| pH | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 8.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 8.5 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4∗∗ | 5∗∗ | |
| Volume (mL) | 13.0 ± 4.6 | 11.6 ± 1.9 | 15.2 ± 1.1 | 11.4 ± 4.4 | 17.6 ± 5.5 | 10.8 ± 2.8 | 12.4 ± 4.6 | 8.8 ± 4.0∗∗ | |
/∗∗Significant difference at P < 0.05/P < 0.01 levels compared with the negative control by the Mann–Whitney U test. GLU, glucose (mg/dL); BIL, bilirubin (mg/dL); KET, ketone body (mg/dL); and SG, specific gravity.
Hematological parameters of male and female SD rats in the 13-week repeated oral toxicity study of EAG.
| Tests | EAG (mg/kg/day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | |
| Male | ||||
| RBC (106/ | 8.99 ± 0.55 | 9.01 ± 0.22a | 8.81 ± 0.37 | 8.87 ± 0.42 |
| HGB (g/dL) | 15.3 ± 0.5 | 15.5 ± 0.4a | 15.0 ± 0.5 | 15.0 ± 0.4 |
| HCT (%) | 47.3 ± 1.8 | 47.9 ± 1.4a | 46.7 ± 1.3 | 46.6 ± 1.6 |
| MCV (fL) | 52.7 ± 1.9 | 53.2 ± 1.0a | 53.1 ± 2.6 | 52.5 ± 1.1 |
| MCH (pg) | 17.1 ± 0.8 | 17.2 ± 0.3a | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 16.9 ± 0.5 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 32.4 ± 0.5 | 32.3 ± 0.4a | 32.1 ± 0.8 | 32.3 ± 0.5 |
| PLT (103/ | 919.2 ± 61.3 | 905.9 ± 93.0a | 890.4 ± 71.7 | 933.3 ± 74.8 |
| WBC (103/ | 6.30 ± 1.37 | 7.22 ± 2.18a | 7.54 ± 1.16 | 7.91 ± 0.97 |
| NEU (103/ | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.6a | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| LYM (103/ | 4.6 ± 1.2 | 5.2 ± 1.6a | 5.4 ± 1.0 | 6.3 ± 1.0∗ |
| MONO (103/ | 0.28 ± 0.12 | 0.31 ± 0.10a | 0.32 ± 0.11 | 0.30 ± 0.06 |
| EOS (103/ | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.03a | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.03 |
| BASO (103/ | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01a | 0.01 ± 0.00 | 0.01 ± 0.00 |
| PT (sec) | 8.0 ± 0.2 | 8.1 ± 0.2a | 8.0 ± 0.2 | 7.8 ± 0.2 |
| Female | ||||
| RBC (106/ | 7.98 ± 0.35 | 7.72 ± 0.30 | 7.86 ± 0.22 | 7.94 ± 0.28 |
| HGB (g/dL) | 14.3 ± 0.3 | 14.0 ± 0.4 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | 14.3 ± 0.4 |
| HCT (%) | 43.5 ± 1.3 | 42.8 ± 1.2 | 43.2 ± 1.9 | 43.7 ± 1.2 |
| MCV (fL) | 54.6 ± 1.8 | 55.5 ± 2.1 | 54.9 ± 0.8 | 55.0 ± 0.8 |
| MCH (pg) | 17.9 ± 0.6 | 18.1 ± 0.7 | 18.0 ± 0.4 | 17.9 ± 0.3 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 32.8 ± 0.2 | 32.7 ± 0.4 | 32.7 ± 0.4 | 32.6 ± 0.4 |
| PLT (103/ | 969.9 ± 60.9 | 1023.9 ± 89.3 | 977.4 ± 87.8 | 950.3 ± 66.4 |
| WBC (103/ | 3.67 ± 0.95 | 3.75 ± 1.03 | 3.84 ± 1.22 | 4.01 ± 1.18 |
| NEU (103/ | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| LYM (103/ | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 1.0 | 3.3 ± 0.9 |
| MONO (103/ | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.05 |
| EOS (103/ | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.03 |
| BASO (103/ | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.00 ± 0.01 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.01 |
| PT (sec) | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 7.4 ± 0.2## | 7.3 ± 0.2## | 7.4 ± 0.2## |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.Significant difference at P < 0.05 levels compared with the negative control by Scheffe multiple range test. ##Significant difference at P < 0.01 levels compared with the negative control by Duncan multiple range test. aNumber of animals in the group was 9; otherwise mean of 10 animals/sex/group. RBC, red blood cell; HGB, hemoglobin concentration; HCT, hematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean cell hemoglobin; MCHC, mean cell hemoglobin concentration; PLT, platelet count; WBC, white blood cell; NEU, neutrophil; LYM, lymphocyte; MONO, monocyte; EOS, eosinophil; BASO, basophil; and PT, prothrombin time.
Clinical biochemistry parameters of male and female SD rats in the 13-week repeated oral toxicity study of EAG.
| Tests | EAG (mg/kg/day) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | |
| Male | ||||
| AST (U/L) | 83.7 ± 16.7 | 77.2 ± 14.9a | 82.6 ± 15.9 | 70.6 ± 6.6 |
| ALT (U/L) | 33.3 ± 5.8 | 32.6 ± 6.3a | 33.1 ± 4.1 | 31.8 ± 3.1 |
| ALP (U/L) | 88.1 ± 15.4 | 82.1 ± 16.0a | 89.8 ± 17.8 | 93.5 ± 18.0 |
| CPK (U/L) | 160.9 ± 80.9 | 173.8 ± 124.2a | 157.1 ± 94.7 | 118.0 ± 50.8 |
| TBIL (mg/dL) | 0.149 ± 0.030 | 0.145 ± 0.032a | 0.145 ± 0.020 | 0.145 ± 0.020 |
| GLU (mg/dL) | 155.0 ± 19.3 | 149.7 ± 14.8a | 151.1 ± 22.1 | 145.0 ± 17.0 |
| TCHO (mg/dL) | 89.0 ± 21.2 | 101.8 ± 21.3a | 101.4 ± 24.0 | 104.8 ± 24.2 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 56.3 ± 25.8 | 63.2 ± 26.2a | 60.6 ± 19.9 | 65.6 ± 28.2 |
| TP (g/dL) | 6.27 ± 0.16 | 6.37 ± 0.19a | 6.29 ± 0.29 | 6.30 ± 0.26 |
| ALB (g/dL) | 2.90 ± 0.07 | 2.95 ± 0.11a | 2.95 ± 0.11 | 2.93 ± 0.09 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 13.9 ± 1.6 | 14.7 ± 1.1a | 14.4 ± 2.3 | 13.6 ± 1.9 |
| CRE (mg/dL) | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 0.39 ± 0.02a | 0.39 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.03 |
|
| ||||
| Female | ||||
| AST (U/L) | 70.1 ± 11.2 | 76.8 ± 13.8 | 76.4 ± 14.2 | 73.0 ± 18.0 |
| ALT (U/L) | 22.1 ± 3.5 | 24.1 ± 6.3 | 25.0 ± 4.6 | 25.5 ± 3.6 |
| ALP (U/L) | 43.5 ± 15.6 | 54.2 ± 14.1 | 46.8 ± 13.4 | 45.8 ± 11.1 |
| CPK (U/L) | 146.6 ± 126.3 | 126.4 ± 84.9 | 149.6 ± 94.6 | 128.1 ± 54.7 |
| TBIL (mg/dL) | 0.169 ± 0.024 | 0.190 ± 0.038 | 0.176 ± 0.020 | 0.174 ± 0.018 |
| GLU (mg/dL) | 121.4 ± 14.5 | 129.3 ± 16.1 | 122.7 ± 14.6 | 122.0 ± 10.7 |
| TCHO (mg/dL) | 86.2 ± 20.0 | 92.5 ± 8.5 | 100.5 ± 17.6 | 85.3 ± 10.9 |
| TG (mg/dL) | 35.6 ± 6.3 | 35.0 ± 4.7 | 36.3 ± 8.4 | 32.9 ± 8.4 |
| TP (g/dL) | 5.89 ± 0.26 | 6.11 ± 0.21 | 6.02 ± 0.20 | 5.97 ± 0.17 |
| ALB (g/dL) | 2.99 ± 0.13 | 3.11 ± 0.15 | 3.05 ± 0.11 | 3.12 ± 0.11 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 15.8 ± 2.3 | 15.0 ± 1.3 | 15.0 ± 2.4 | 14.3 ± 1.2 |
| CRE (mg/dL) | 0.48 ± 0.04 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.02 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. aNumber of animals in group was 9; otherwise mean of 10 animals/sex/group. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; CPK, creatine phosphokinase; TBIL, total bilirubin; GLU, glucose; TCHO, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; TP, total protein; ALB, albumin; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; and CRE, creatinine.
Histopathologic findings of male and female SD rats in the 13-week repeated oral toxicity study of EAG.
| Organs | Findings | EAG (mg/kg/day) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||||||
| 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | 0 | 1,250 | 2,500 | 5,000 | ||
| Nonglandular stomach | Hyperplasia, squamous cells, limiting ridge | 0 | 3 | 7∗∗ | 10∗∗∗ | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8∗∗∗ |
| No. of animals examined | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
∗∗/∗∗∗Significant difference at P < 0.01/P < 0.001 levels compared with the negative control by Fisher two-tailed test.
Results of bacterial reverse mutation assay.
| Test article | Dose ( | Colonies/plate [factor]a | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA98 | TA100 | TA1535 | TA1537 | WP2 | |||||||
| −S9 mix | +S9 mix | −S9 mix | +S9 mix | −S9 mix | +S9 mix | −S9 mix | +S9 mix | −S9 mix | +S9 mix | ||
| EAG | 0 | 26 ± 4 | 25 ± 3 | 114 ± 8 | 107 ± 9 | 14 ± 2 | 15 ± 2 | 15 ± 2 | 15 ± 2 | 22 ± 3 | 29 ± 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||
| 50 | 25 ± 6 | 28 ± 3 | 111 ± 6 | 102 ± 9 | 12 ± 4 | 16 ± 5 | 13 ± 2 | 13 ± 3 | 22 ± 4 | 25 ± 4 | |
| [1.0] | [1.1] | [1.0] | [0.9] | [0.9] | [1.1] | [0.9] | [0.9] | [1.0] | [0.9] | ||
| 150 | 27 ± 4 | 30 ± 5 | 107 ± 15 | 120 ± 16 | 10 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 15 ± 1 | 12 ± 3 | 18 ± 3 | 26 ± 7 | |
| [1.1] | [1.2] | [0.9] | [1.1] | [0.8] | [1.0] | [1.0] | [0.8] | [0.8] | [0.9] | ||
| 500 | 34 ± 5 | 34 ± 4 | 103 ± 7 | 105 ± 5 | 13 ± 1 | 17 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 14 ± 1 | 20 ± 2 | 26 ± 6 | |
| [1.3] | [1.4] | [0.9] | [1.0] | [1.0] | [1.1] | [0.9] | [1.0] | [0.9] | [0.9] | ||
| 1,500 | 26 ± 5 | 40 ± 3 | 109 ± 6 | 120 ± 10 | 11 ± 1 | 15 ± 2 | 12 ± 2 | 13 ± 2 | 23 ± 4 | 26 ± 4 | |
| [1.0] | [1.6] | [1.0] | [1.1] | [0.8] | [1.0] | [0.8] | [0.9] | [1.0] | [0.9] | ||
| 3,000 | 34 ± 5 | 56 ± 5 | 121 ± 2 | 137 ± 1 | 13 ± 2 | 13 ± 3 | 13 ± 3 | 17 ± 3 | 22 ± 2 | 27 ± 2 | |
| [1.3] | [2.3] | [1.1] | [1.3] | [0.9] | [0.9] | [0.9] | [1.2] | [1.0] | [0.9] | ||
| 5,000 | 34 ± 2 | 63 ± 6 | 116 ± 12 | 137 ± 3 | 13 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 12 ± 2 | 20 ± 1 | 25 ± 2 | 23 ± 3 | |
| [1.3] | [2.5] | [1.0] | [1.3] | [0.9] | [0.8] | [0.8] | [1.3] | [1.1] | [0.8] | ||
| Positive controlb | 225 ± 16 | 118 ± 8 | 465 ± 60 | 1504 ± 102 | 408 ± 12 | 142 ± 19 | 265 ± 20 | 182 ± 22 | 227 ± 25 | 104 ± 8 | |
| [8.8] | [4.8] | [4.1] | [14.0] | [29.9] | [9.3] | [18.1] | [12.1] | [10.3] | [3.6] | ||
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. aThree plates were used each dose. Factor = no. of colonies of treated plate/no. of colonies of negative control plate. bTA98: 2-NF 2 μg/plate (−S9 mix), B[a]P 1 μg/plate (+S9 mix); TA100:SA 0.5 μg/plate (−S9 mix), 2-AA 1 μg/plate (+S9 mix); TA1535:SA 0.5 μg/plate (−S9 mix), 2-AA 2 μg/plate (+S9 mix); TA1537:ICR-191 0.5 μg/plate (−S9 mix), 2-AA 1 μg/plate (+S9 mix); and WP2 uvrA:4NQO 0.5 μg/plate (−S9 mix), 2-AA 6 μg/plate (+S9 mix). 2-NF, 2-nitrofluorene; B[a]P, benzo[a]pyrene; SA, sodium azide; 2-AA, 2-aminoanthracene; ICR-191, acridine mutagen ICR 191; and 4NQO, 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide.
In vitro chromosome aberration test in Chinese hamster lung cells with EAG.
| Treatment schedulea | S9 mix | Dose ( | PP + ER (%) | Ratio of aberrant metaphaseb (%) | Cell countsc | Mean | RICCd (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flask A | Flask B | |||||||
| 06–18 | + | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8,662 | 8,264 | 8,463 | 100 |
| 350 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 8,263 | 8,387 | 8,325 | 97 | ||
| 700 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 8,563 | 8,790 | 8,676 | 104 | ||
| 1,300 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 6,083 | 6,262 | 6,172 | 57 | ||
| 1,400 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5,440 | 5,382 | 5,411 | 43 | ||
| B[a]P 20 | 0.00 | 15.00∗∗ | 6,000 | 5,850 | 5,925 | 52 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 06–18 | − | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9,162 | 9,348 | 9,255 | 100 |
| 300 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 9,528 | 8,722 | 9,124 | 98 | ||
| 600 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 8,670 | 8,912 | 8,791 | 92 | ||
| 1,100 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 6,609 | 6,657 | 6,633 | 57 | ||
| 1,200 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 6,032 | 5,864 | 5,947 | 46 | ||
| 4NQO 0.4 | 0.00 | 10.33∗∗ | 7,309 | 7,192 | 7,250 | 67 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| 24–0 | − | 0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 8,900 | 8,910 | 8,905 | 100 |
| 225 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 8,996 | 9,273 | 9,134 | 104 | ||
| 450 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 9,589 | 9,273 | 9,431 | 109 | ||
| 800 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 6,245 | 6,552 | 6,398 | 56 | ||
| 900 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 6,031 | 5,889 | 5,960 | 49 | ||
| 4NQO 0.4 | 0.00 | 9.33∗∗ | 7,012 | 6,669 | 6,840 | 64 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Initial cell count | 3,142 | 3,162 | 3,152 | |||||
∗∗Significant difference at P < 0.01 levels compared with the negative control by Fisher's exact test. aTreatment time – recovery time, hours, bGap excludes, 150 metaphases were examined per culture. cAfter harvesting mitotic cells, each culture was trypsinized and suspended with 0.5 mL of 0.1% trypsin and 5 mL of culture medium. The cell suspensions of 0.4 mL/culture were diluted 50 times with 19.6 mL of Isoton® sol. The cells in 0.5 mL of Isoton® sol. were counted twice/culture using Coulter Counter model Z2. The actual number of cells per flask = mean cell count × 550. dRelative increase in cell count = ((cell count of treated flask – initial cell count)/(cell count of the negative control flask – initial cell count)) × 100, PP, polyploid; ER, endoreduplication; B[a]P, benzo[a]pyrene (positive control); and 4NQO, 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (positive control).
Observations of micronucleus and PCE:RBC ratio.
| Test article | Dose (mg/kg/day) | Animals per dose | MNPCEa (mean ± SD) | PCE:RBC ratio (mean ± SD) | % control |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAG | 0 | 6 | 1.33 ± 1.03 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 100 |
| 500 | 5b | 1.20 ± 0.84 | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 101 | |
| 1,000 | 6 | 1.00 ± 1.10 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 100 | |
| 2,000 | 6 | 1.50 ± 1.38 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 99 | |
|
| |||||
| CPA | 70 | 6 | 110.50 ± 29.71∗∗ | 0.39 ± 0.02## | 69 |
∗∗Significant difference at P < 0.01 levels compared with the negative control by the Mann–Whitney. ##Significant difference at P < 0.01 levels compared with the control by Student's t-test. aRatio of MNPCE with 4,000 PCE, bOne of the mice was died. PCE, polychromatic erythrocyte; RBC, red blood cells (polychromatic erythrocyte + normochromatic erythrocyte); MNPCE, micronucleated polychromatic erythrocyte; and CPA, cyclophosphamide monohydrate (positive control).