Literature DB >> 32769752

Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices.

Andreea D Fişuş1, Nino D Hirnschall, Oliver Findl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, IOLMaster 700 (biometer A), and ANTERION (biometer B).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Karl Landsteiner Institute, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
METHOD: Biometric measurements of cataract patients performed between June and July 2019 were reviewed. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery were measured with both SS-OCT devices on the same day. The following biometry parameters were compared: keratometry, central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL). RESULT: In total, 389 eyes of 209 subjects were measured with both devices. The mean absolute difference between the keratometry data of the 2 devices was 0.04 ± 0.05 mm (7.80 ± 0.26 mm for biometer A and 7.82 ± 0.26 mm for biometer B; P < .0001) for the steep keratometry readings and 0.04 ± 0.04 mm (7.63 ± 0.26 mm and 7.65 ± 0.25 mm; P < .0001) for the flat keratometry readings. For ACD and LT, the mean absolute difference was 0.07 ± 0.04 mm and 0.07 ± 0.04 mm. The mean absolute difference for AL was 0.02 ± 0.03 mm (23.55 ± 1.18 mm for biometer A and 23.54 ± 1.18 mm for biometer B; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Good agreement was found between the 2 devices, with a minor offset for ACD and LT measurements. Although differences were found to be small, the devices should not be used interchangeably.
Copyright © 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 32769752     DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  10 in total

1.  Repeatability of a new swept-source optical coherence tomographer and agreement with other three optical biometers.

Authors:  Shi-Ming Cheng; Jia-Sheng Zhang; Xu Shao; Ze-Tong Wu; Tian-Tian Li; Po Wang; Jun-Hai Lin; A-Yong Yu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Similarity of eyes in a cataractous population-How reliable is the biometry of the fellow eye for lens power calculation?

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nóra Szentmáry; Alan Cayless; Veronika Röggla; Christina Leydolt; Jascha Wendelstein; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Refractive Precision of Ray Tracing IOL Calculations Based on OCT Data versus Traditional IOL Calculation Formulas Based on Reflectometry in Patients with a History of Laser Vision Correction for Myopia.

Authors:  Bjørn Gjerdrum; Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Per Olof Lundmark; Bente Monica Aakre
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-26

4.  Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Mi Yeon Song; Sung Rae Noh; Kook Young Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of ocular biometry in primary angle-closure disease with two swept source optical coherence tomography devices.

Authors:  Boonsong Wanichwecharungruang; Anyarak Amornpetchsathaporn; Wisakorn Wongwijitsook; Kittipong Kongsomboon; Somporn Chantra
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Translation model for CW chord to angle Alpha derived from a Monte-Carlo simulation based on raytracing.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Nóra Szentmáry; Alan Cayless; Johannes Weisensee; Jascha Wendelstein; Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Agreement between Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.

Authors:  Ji Young Moon; Soo Chang Cho; Hyun Jin Kim; Roo Min Jun; Kyung Eun Han
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-15

8.  Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.

Authors:  Amita Panda; Ashok Nanda; Kalyani Sahoo
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.969

9.  Comparison of two novel swept-source optical coherence tomography devices to a partial coherence interferometry-based biometer.

Authors:  Tommy C Y Chan; Marco C Y Yu; Vivian Chiu; Gilda Lai; Christopher K S Leung; Poemen P M Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology.

Authors:  Jing Dong; Jinhan Yao; Shuimiao Chang; Piotr Kanclerz; Ramin Khoramnia; Xiaogang Wang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.