Literature DB >> 12581990

Is the cerebellum a smith predictor?

R C Miall1, D J Weir, D M Wolpert, J F Stein.   

Abstract

The motor system may use internal predictive models of the motor apparatus to achieve better control than would be possible by negative feedback. Several theories have proposed that the cerebellum may form these predictive representations. In this article, we review these theories and try to unify them by reference to an engineering control model known as a Smith Predictor. We suggest that the cerebellum forms two types of internal model. One model is a forward predictive model of the motor apparatus (e.g., limb and muscle), providing a rapid prediction of the sensory consequences of each movement. The second model is of the time delays in the control loop (due to receptor and effector delays, axonal conductances, and cognitive processing delays). This model delays a copy of the rapid prediction so that it can be compared in temporal register with actual sensory feedback from the movement. The result of this comparison is used both to correct for errors in performance and as a training signal to learn the first model. We discuss evidence that the cerebellum could form both of these models and suggest that the cerebellum may hold at least two separate Smith Predictors. One, in the lateral cerebellum, would predict the movement outcome in visual, egocentric, or peripersonal coordinates. Another, in the intermediate cerebellum, would predict the consequences in motor coordinates. Generalization of the Smith Predictor theory is discussed in light of cerebellar involvement in nonmotor control systems, including autonomic functions and cognition.

Year:  1993        PMID: 12581990     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1993.9942050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  224 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of nonvisual feedback loops during reaching: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  M Desmurget; H Gréa; J S Grethe; C Prablanc; G E Alexander; S T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action.

Authors:  C D Frith; S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Diffusion of nitric oxide can facilitate cerebellar learning: A simulation study.

Authors:  N Schweighofer; G Ferriol
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Visual, motor and attentional influences on proprioceptive contributions to perception of hand path rectilinearity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert A Scheidt; Kyle P Lillis; Scott J Emerson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging examination of two modular architectures for switching multiple internal models.

Authors:  Hiroshi Imamizu; Tomoe Kuroda; Toshinori Yoshioka; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events.

Authors:  Philip D Nixon
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 8.  Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Angela Sirigu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Role of uncertainty in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Robert J van Beers; Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Walking flexibility after hemispherectomy: split-belt treadmill adaptation and feedback control.

Authors:  Julia T Choi; Eileen P G Vining; Darcy S Reisman; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 13.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.