Literature DB >> 35946809

Individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across orofacial speech movements and limb reaching movements.

Nick M Kitchen1, Kwang S Kim1, Prince Z Wang1, Robert J Hermosillo1, Ludo Max1,2.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor adaptation is critical for human motor control but shows considerable interindividual variability. Efforts are underway to identify factors accounting for individual differences in specific adaptation tasks. However, a fundamental question has remained unaddressed: Is an individual's capability for adaptation effector system specific or does it reflect a generalized adaptation ability? We therefore tested the same participants in analogous adaptation paradigms focusing on distinct sensorimotor systems: speaking with perturbed auditory feedback and reaching with perturbed visual feedback. Each task was completed once with the perturbation introduced gradually (ramped up over 60 trials) and, on a different day, once with the perturbation introduced suddenly. Consistent with studies of each system separately, visuomotor reach adaptation was more complete than auditory-motor speech adaptation (80% vs. 29% of the perturbation). Adaptation was not significantly correlated between the speech and reach tasks. Moreover, considered within tasks, 1) adaptation extent was correlated between the gradual and sudden conditions for reaching but not for speaking, 2) adaptation extent was correlated with additional measures of performance (e.g., trial duration, within-trial corrections) only for reaching and not for speaking, and 3) fitting individual participant adaptation profiles with exponential rather than linear functions offered a larger benefit [lower root mean square error (RMSE)] for the reach task than for the speech task. Combined, results suggest that the ability for sensorimotor adaptation relies on neural plasticity mechanisms that are effector system specific rather than generalized. This finding has important implications for ongoing efforts seeking to identify cognitive, behavioral, and neurochemical predictors of individual sensorimotor adaptation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study provides the first detailed demonstration that individual sensorimotor adaptation characteristics are independent across articulatory speech movements and limb reaching movements. Thus, individual sensorimotor learning abilities are effector system specific rather than generalized. Findings regarding one effector system do not necessarily apply to other systems, different underlying mechanisms may be involved, and implications for clinical rehabilitation or performance training also cannot be generalized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; reaching; sensorimotor adaptation; speech; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35946809      PMCID: PMC9484989          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00167.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  91 in total

1.  Motor cortex hand area and speech: implications for the development of language.

Authors:  Ingo Gerrit Meister; Babak Boroojerdi; Henrik Foltys; Roland Sparing; Walter Huber; Rudolf Töpper
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Cerebellar regions involved in adaptation to force field and visuomotor perturbation.

Authors:  Opher Donchin; Kasja Rabe; Jörn Diedrichsen; Níall Lally; Beate Schoch; Elke Ruth Gizewski; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Partial compensation for altered auditory feedback: a tradeoff with somatosensory feedback?

Authors:  Shira Katseff; John Houde; Keith Johnson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Dissociating the roles of the cerebellum and motor cortex during adaptive learning: the motor cortex retains what the cerebellum learns.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Alejandro Vazquez; Neel Pasricha; Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Grasp with hand and mouth: a kinematic study on healthy subjects.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; F Benuzzi; M Gangitano; S Grimaldi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Understanding sensorimotor adaptation and learning for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Amy J Bastian
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  The perils of learning to move while speaking: One-sided interference between speech and visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Marcus Y M Quek; Calum B Prescott; John-Stuart Brittain; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-06

9.  Implicit motor learning within three trials.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ruttle; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intermanual transfer of visuomotor adaptation is related to awareness.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Heiko K Strüder; Opher Donchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.