Thomas R Campion1, Catherine K Craven2, David A Dorr3, Boyd M Knosp4. 1. Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA. 2. Institute for Health Care Delivery Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. 4. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Among National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, adoption of electronic data warehouses for research (EDW4R) containing data from electronic health record systems is nearly ubiquitous. Although benefits of EDW4R include more effective, efficient support of scientists, little is known about how CTSA hubs have implemented EDW4R services. The goal of this qualitative study was to understand the ways in which CTSA hubs have operationalized EDW4R to support clinical and translational researchers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After conducting semistructured interviews with informatics leaders from 20 CTSA hubs, we performed a directed content analysis of interview notes informed by naturalistic inquiry. RESULTS: We identified 12 themes: organization and data; oversight and governance; data access request process; data access modalities; data access for users with different skill sets; engagement, communication, and literacy; service management coordinated with enterprise information technology; service management coordinated within a CTSA hub; service management coordinated between informatics and biostatistics; funding approaches; performance metrics; and future trends and current technology challenges. DISCUSSION: This study is a step in developing an improved understanding and creating a common vocabulary about EDW4R operations across institutions. Findings indicate an opportunity for establishing best practices for EDW4R operations in academic medicine. Such guidance could reduce the costs associated with developing an EDW4R by establishing a clear roadmap and maturity path for institutions to follow. CONCLUSIONS: CTSA hubs described varying approaches to EDW4R operations that may assist other institutions in better serving investigators with electronic patient data.
OBJECTIVE: Among National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs, adoption of electronic data warehouses for research (EDW4R) containing data from electronic health record systems is nearly ubiquitous. Although benefits of EDW4R include more effective, efficient support of scientists, little is known about how CTSA hubs have implemented EDW4R services. The goal of this qualitative study was to understand the ways in which CTSA hubs have operationalized EDW4R to support clinical and translational researchers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After conducting semistructured interviews with informatics leaders from 20 CTSA hubs, we performed a directed content analysis of interview notes informed by naturalistic inquiry. RESULTS: We identified 12 themes: organization and data; oversight and governance; data access request process; data access modalities; data access for users with different skill sets; engagement, communication, and literacy; service management coordinated with enterprise information technology; service management coordinated within a CTSA hub; service management coordinated between informatics and biostatistics; funding approaches; performance metrics; and future trends and current technology challenges. DISCUSSION: This study is a step in developing an improved understanding and creating a common vocabulary about EDW4R operations across institutions. Findings indicate an opportunity for establishing best practices for EDW4R operations in academic medicine. Such guidance could reduce the costs associated with developing an EDW4R by establishing a clear roadmap and maturity path for institutions to follow. CONCLUSIONS: CTSA hubs described varying approaches to EDW4R operations that may assist other institutions in better serving investigators with electronic patient data.
Authors: Griffin M Weber; Shawn N Murphy; Andrew J McMurry; Douglas Macfadden; Daniel J Nigrin; Susanne Churchill; Isaac S Kohane Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jyoti Kamal; Jianhua Liu; Michael Ostrander; Jennifer Santangelo; Ravi Dyta; Patrick Rogers; Hagop S Mekhjian Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2010-11-13
Authors: Shawn N Murphy; Griffin Weber; Michael Mendis; Vivian Gainer; Henry C Chueh; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Elmer V Bernstam; William R Hersh; Stephen B Johnson; Christopher G Chute; Hien Nguyen; Ida Sim; Meredith Nahm; Mark G Weiner; Perry Miller; Robert P DiLaura; Marc Overcash; Harold P Lehmann; David Eichmann; Brian D Athey; Richard H Scheuermann; Nick Anderson; Justin Starren; Paul A Harris; Jack W Smith; Ed Barbour; Jonathan C Silverstein; David A Krusch; Rakesh Nagarajan; Michael J Becich Journal: Acad Med Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: William R Hersh; James Cimino; Philip R O Payne; Peter Embi; Judith Logan; Mark Weiner; Elmer V Bernstam; Harold Lehmann; George Hripcsak; Timothy Hartzog; Joel Saltz Journal: EGEMS (Wash DC) Date: 2013-10-08
Authors: Daniella Meeker; Paul Fu; Gary Garcia; Irene E Dyer; Kabir Yadav; Ross Fleishman; Hal F Yee Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Donna A Santillan; Mark K Santillan; Heather A Davis; Mark Crooks; Patrick J Flanagan; Chris E Ortman; Elissa Z Faro; Stephen K Hunter; Boyd K Knosp Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2022-05-23
Authors: Boyd M Knosp; Catherine K Craven; David A Dorr; Elmer V Bernstam; Thomas R Campion Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 7.942
Authors: Chunlei Tang; Jing Ma; Li Zhou; Joseph Plasek; Yuqing He; Yun Xiong; Yangyong Zhu; Yajun Huang; David Bates Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: William R Hogan; Elizabeth A Shenkman; Temple Robinson; Olveen Carasquillo; Patricia S Robinson; Rebecca Z Essner; Jiang Bian; Gigi Lipori; Christopher Harle; Tanja Magoc; Lizabeth Manini; Tona Mendoza; Sonya White; Alex Loiacono; Jackie Hall; Dave Nelson Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Michael G Kahn; Joyce Y Mui; Michael J Ames; Anoop K Yamsani; Nikita Pozdeyev; Nicholas Rafaels; Ian M Brooks Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Wenjun He; Katie G Kirchoff; Royce R Sampson; Kimberly K McGhee; Andrew M Cates; Jihad S Obeid; Leslie A Lenert Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.497