Literature DB >> 19550198

Synergies and distinctions between computational disciplines in biomedical research: perspective from the Clinical andTranslational Science Award programs.

Elmer V Bernstam1, William R Hersh, Stephen B Johnson, Christopher G Chute, Hien Nguyen, Ida Sim, Meredith Nahm, Mark G Weiner, Perry Miller, Robert P DiLaura, Marc Overcash, Harold P Lehmann, David Eichmann, Brian D Athey, Richard H Scheuermann, Nick Anderson, Justin Starren, Paul A Harris, Jack W Smith, Ed Barbour, Jonathan C Silverstein, David A Krusch, Rakesh Nagarajan, Michael J Becich.   

Abstract

Clinical and translational research increasingly requires computation. Projects may involve multiple computationally oriented groups including information technology (IT) professionals, computer scientists, and biomedical informaticians. However, many biomedical researchers are not aware of the distinctions among these complementary groups, leading to confusion, delays, and suboptimal results. Although written from the perspective of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) programs within academic medical centers, this article addresses issues that extend beyond clinical and translational research. The authors describe the complementary but distinct roles of operational IT, research IT, computer science, and biomedical informatics using a clinical data warehouse as a running example. In general, IT professionals focus on technology. The authors distinguish between two types of IT groups within academic medical centers: central or administrative IT (supporting the administrative computing needs of large organizations) and research IT (supporting the computing needs of researchers). Computer scientists focus on general issues of computation such as designing faster computers or more efficient algorithms, rather than specific applications. In contrast, informaticians are concerned with data, information, and knowledge. Biomedical informaticians draw on a variety of tools, including but not limited to computers, to solve information problems in health care and biomedicine. The paper concludes with recommendations regarding administrative structures that can help to maximize the benefit of computation to biomedical research within academic health centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19550198      PMCID: PMC2884382          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8144d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  23 in total

1.  Basic local alignment search tool.

Authors:  S F Altschul; W Gish; W Miller; E W Myers; D J Lipman
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1990-10-05       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Cultivating informatics competencies in a community of practice.

Authors:  Amy J Barton
Journal:  Nurs Adm Q       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

3.  Who are the informaticians? What we know and should know.

Authors:  William Hersh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US academic health centers: strategic value and opportunities for investment.

Authors:  Fran Turisco; Diane Keogh; Connie Stubbs; John Glaser; William F Crowley
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Breaking the translational barriers: the value of integrating biomedical informatics and translational research.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren; Hugh H Tilson; David Dowdy
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Translational research: moving discovery to practice.

Authors:  E A Zerhouni
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system.

Authors:  Yong Y Han; Joseph A Carcillo; Shekhar T Venkataraman; Robert S B Clark; R Scott Watson; Trung C Nguyen; Hülya Bayir; Richard A Orr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Learning objectives for medical student education--guidelines for medical schools: report I of the Medical School Objectives Project.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Where's the science in medical informatics?

Authors:  C P Friedman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Building a virtual cancer research organization.

Authors:  Mark C Hornbrook; Gene Hart; Jennifer L Ellis; Donald J Bachman; Gary Ansell; Sarah M Greene; Edward H Wagner; Roy Pardee; Mark M Schmidt; Ann Geiger; Amy L Butani; Terry Field; Hassan Fouayzi; Irina Miroshnik; Liyan Liu; Robert Diseker; Karen Wells; Rick Krajenta; Lois Lamerato; Christine Neslund Dudas
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005
View more
  16 in total

1.  AMIA Board white paper: definition of biomedical informatics and specification of core competencies for graduate education in the discipline.

Authors:  Casimir A Kulikowski; Edward H Shortliffe; Leanne M Currie; Peter L Elkin; Lawrence E Hunter; Todd R Johnson; Ira J Kalet; Leslie A Lenert; Mark A Musen; Judy G Ozbolt; Jack W Smith; Peter Z Tarczy-Hornoch; Jeffrey J Williamson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Predictors of student success in graduate biomedical informatics training: introductory course and program success.

Authors:  Irmgard U Willcockson; Craig W Johnson; William Hersh; Elmer V Bernstam
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Probabilistic techniques for obtaining accurate patient counts in Clinical Data Warehouses.

Authors:  Risa B Myers; Jorge R Herskovic
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Gap analysis of biomedical informatics graduate education competencies.

Authors:  Anna L Ritko; Michelle Odlum
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 5.  Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.

Authors:  Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Linking scientific discovery and better health for the nation: the first three years of the NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Awards.

Authors:  Robert M Califf; Lars Berglund
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Characterizing Data Discovery and End-User Computing Needs in Clinical Translational Science.

Authors:  Parmit K Chilana; Elishema Fishman; Estella M Geraghty; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Fredric M Wolf; Nick R Anderson
Journal:  J Organ End User Comput       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.349

8.  The National Institutes of Health's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS): design, contents, functionality and experience to date.

Authors:  James J Cimino; Elaine J Ayres; Lyubov Remennik; Sachi Rath; Robert Freedman; Andrea Beri; Yang Chen; Vojtech Huser
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 9.  Neuroinformatics Software Applications Supporting Electronic Data Capture, Management, and Sharing for the Neuroimaging Community.

Authors:  B Nolan Nichols; Kilian M Pohl
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Personalized medicine: challenges and opportunities for translational bioinformatics.

Authors:  Casey Lynnette Overby; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.