Literature DB >> 32580174

Evaluation of CBCT scatter correction using deep convolutional neural networks for head and neck adaptive proton therapy.

Arthur Lalonde1, Brian Winey1, Joost Verburg1, Harald Paganetti1, Gregory C Sharp1.   

Abstract

Adaptive proton therapy (APT) is a promising approach for the treatment of head and neck cancers. One crucial element of APT is daily volumetric imaging of the patient in the treatment position. Such data can be acquired with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), although scatter artifacts make uncorrected CBCT images unsuitable for proton therapy dose calculation. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the performance of a U-shape deep convolutive neural network (U-Net) to perform projection-based scatter correction and enable fast and accurate dose calculation on CBCT images in the context of head and neck APT. CBCT projections are simulated for a cohort of 48 head and neck patients using a GPU accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) code . A U-Net is trained to reproduce MC projection-based scatter correction from raw projections. The accuracy of the scatter correction is experimentally evaluated using CT and CBCT images of an anthropomorphic head phantom. The potential of the method for head and neck APT is assessed by comparing proton therapy dose distributions calculated on scatter-free, uncorrected and scatter-corrected CBCT images. Finally, dose calculation accuracy is estimated in experimental patient images using a previously validated empirical scatter correction as reference. The mean and mean absolute HU differences between scatter-free and scatter-corrected images are -0.8 and 13.4 HU, compared to -28.6 and 69.6 HU for the uncorrected images. In the head phantom, the root-mean square difference of proton ranges calculated in the reference CT and corrected CBCT is 0.73 mm. The average 2%/2 mm gamma pass rate for proton therapy plans optimized in the scatter free images and re-calculated in the scatter-corrected ones is 98.89%. In experimental CBCT patient images, a 3%/3 mm passing rate of 98.72% is achieved between the proposed method and the reference one. All CBCT projection volume could be corrected in less than 5 seconds.
© 2020 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; U-Net; adaptive radiotherapy; deep learning; proton therapy; scatter correction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32580174      PMCID: PMC8920050          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9fcb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  33 in total

1.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view.

Authors:  B Ohnesorge; T Flohr; K Schwarz; J P Heiken; K T Bae
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Danique L J Barten; Jim P Tol; Max Dahele; Ben J Slotman; Wilko F A R Verbakel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Real-time scatter estimation for medical CT using the deep scatter estimation: Method and robustness analysis with respect to different anatomies, dose levels, tube voltages, and data truncation.

Authors:  Joscha Maier; Elias Eulig; Tim Vöth; Michael Knaup; Jan Kuntz; Stefan Sawall; Marc Kachelrieß
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Characterization of scattered radiation in kV CBCT images using Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Geneviève Jarry; Sean A Graham; Douglas J Moseley; David J Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Frank Verhaegen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Proton therapy for head and neck cancer: expanding the therapeutic window.

Authors:  Jonathan E Leeman; Paul B Romesser; Ying Zhou; Sean McBride; Nadeem Riaz; Eric Sherman; Marc A Cohen; Oren Cahlon; Nancy Lee
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Water equivalent path length calculations using scatter-corrected head and neck CBCT images to evaluate patients for adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Jihun Kim; Yang-Kyun Park; Gregory Sharp; Paul Busse; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Stephanie Lim-Reinders; Brian M Keller; Shahad Al-Ward; Arjun Sahgal; Anthony Kim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, proton radiotherapy, and adaptive proton radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; David Ly; Tu D Dan; John Ondos; Holly Ning; Arnaud Belard; John O'Connell; Robert W Miller; Nicole L Simone
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  CBCT correction using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network and unpaired training to enable photon and proton dose calculation.

Authors:  Christopher Kurz; Matteo Maspero; Mark H F Savenije; Guillaume Landry; Florian Kamp; Marco Pinto; Minglun Li; Katia Parodi; Claus Belka; Cornelis A T van den Berg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Comparison of CBCT based synthetic CT methods suitable for proton dose calculations in adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Adrian Thummerer; Paolo Zaffino; Arturs Meijers; Gabriel Guterres Marmitt; Joao Seco; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Johannes A Langendijk; Stefan Both; Maria F Spadea; Antje C Knopf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  A Survey on Deep Learning for Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Ching-Wei Wang; Muhammad-Adil Khalil; Nabila Puspita Firdi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Mislav Bobić; Arthur Lalonde; Gregory C Sharp; Clemens Grassberger; Joost M Verburg; Brian A Winey; Antony J Lomax; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Mislav Bobić; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Gregory C Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.901

5.  CT-on-Rails Versus In-Room CBCT for Online Daily Adaptive Proton Therapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Konrad P Nesteruk; Mislav Bobić; Arthur Lalonde; Brian A Winey; Antony J Lomax; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Generating synthetic CT from low-dose cone-beam CT by using generative adversarial networks for adaptive radiotherapy.

Authors:  Liugang Gao; Kai Xie; Xiaojin Wu; Zhengda Lu; Chunying Li; Jiawei Sun; Tao Lin; Jianfeng Sui; Xinye Ni
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

7.  Virtual monoenergetic micro-CT imaging in mice with artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Brent van der Heyden; Stijn Roden; Rüveyda Dok; Sandra Nuyts; Edmond Sterpin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of group housing and incremental hay supplementation in calf starters at different ages on growth performance, behavior, and health.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadi; Ebrahim Ghasemi; Masoud Alikhani; Majid Akbarian-Tefaghi; Morteza Hosseini Ghaffari
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Management of Motion and Anatomical Variations in Charged Particle Therapy: Past, Present, and Into the Future.

Authors:  Julia M Pakela; Antje Knopf; Lei Dong; Antoni Rucinski; Wei Zou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Generating synthesized computed tomography from CBCT using a conditional generative adversarial network for head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Yun Zhang; Sheng-Gou Ding; Xiao-Chang Gong; Xing-Xing Yuan; Jia-Fan Lin; Qi Chen; Jin-Gao Li
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.