Literature DB >> 31610527

CBCT correction using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network and unpaired training to enable photon and proton dose calculation.

Christopher Kurz1, Matteo Maspero, Mark H F Savenije, Guillaume Landry, Florian Kamp, Marco Pinto, Minglun Li, Katia Parodi, Claus Belka, Cornelis A T van den Berg.   

Abstract

In presence of inter-fractional anatomical changes, clinical benefits are anticipated from image-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Nowadays, cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging is mostly utilized during pre-treatment imaging for position verification. Due to various artifacts, image quality is typically not sufficient for photon or proton dose calculation, thus demanding accurate CBCT correction, as potentially provided by deep learning techniques. This work aimed at investigating the feasibility of utilizing a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cycleGAN) for prostate CBCT correction using unpaired training. Thirty-three patients were included. The network was trained to translate uncorrected, original CBCT images (CBCTorg) into planning CT equivalent images (CBCTcycleGAN). HU accuracy was determined by comparison to a previously validated CBCT correction technique (CBCTcor). Dosimetric accuracy was inferred for volumetric-modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) and opposing single-field uniform dose (OSFUD) proton plans, optimized on CBCTcor and recalculated on CBCTcycleGAN. Single-sided SFUD proton plans were utilized to assess proton range accuracy. The mean HU error of CBCTcycleGAN with respect to CBCTcor decreased from 24 HU for CBCTorg to  -6 HU. Dose calculation accuracy was high for VMAT, with average pass-rates of 100%/89% for a 2%/1% dose difference criterion. For proton OSFUD plans, the average pass-rate for a 2% dose difference criterion was 80%. Using a (2%, 2 mm) gamma criterion, the pass-rate was 96%. 93% of all analyzed SFUD profiles had a range agreement better than 3 mm. CBCT correction time was reduced from 6-10 min for CBCTcor to 10 s for CBCTcycleGAN. Our study demonstrated the feasibility of utilizing a cycleGAN for CBCT correction, achieving high dose calculation accuracy for VMAT. For proton therapy, further improvements may be required. Due to unpaired training, the approach does not rely on anatomically consistent training data or potentially inaccurate deformable image registration. The substantial speed-up for CBCT correction renders the method particularly interesting for adaptive radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31610527     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4d8c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Improving CBCT quality to CT level using deep learning with generative adversarial network.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Ning Yue; Min-Ying Su; Bo Liu; Yi Ding; Yongkang Zhou; Hao Wang; Yu Kuang; Ke Nie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  CBCT-based synthetic CT generation using generative adversarial networks with disentangled representation.

Authors:  Jiwei Liu; Hui Yan; Hanlin Cheng; Jianfei Liu; Pengjian Sun; Boyi Wang; Ronghu Mao; Chi Du; Shengquan Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-12

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A Comparison Study Between CNN-Based Deformed Planning CT and CycleGAN-Based Synthetic CT Methods for Improving iCBCT Image Quality.

Authors:  Bo Yang; Yankui Chang; Yongguang Liang; Zhiqun Wang; Xi Pei; Xie George Xu; Jie Qiu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Evaluation of CBCT scatter correction using deep convolutional neural networks for head and neck adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Harald Paganetti; Gregory C Sharp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Comparison of weekly and daily online adaptation for head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Mislav Bobić; Arthur Lalonde; Gregory C Sharp; Clemens Grassberger; Joost M Verburg; Brian A Winey; Antony J Lomax; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Multitask 3D CBCT-to-CT translation and organs-at-risk segmentation using physics-based data augmentation.

Authors:  Navdeep Dahiya; Sadegh R Alam; Pengpeng Zhang; Si-Yuan Zhang; Tianfang Li; Anthony Yezzi; Saad Nadeem
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Onboard cone-beam CT-based replan evaluation for head and neck proton therapy.

Authors:  Alexander Stanforth; Liyong Lin; Jonathan J Beitler; James R Janopaul-Naylor; Chih-Wei Chang; Robert H Press; Sagar A Patel; Jennifer Zhao; Bree Eaton; Eduard E Schreibmann; James Jung; Duncan Bohannon; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang; Mark W McDonald; Jun Zhou
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 10.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.