| Literature DB >> 32533916 |
Mandana Arbab1, Max W Shen2, Beverly Mok1, Christopher Wilson1, Żaneta Matuszek3, Christopher A Cassa4, David R Liu5.
Abstract
Although base editors are widely used to install targeted point mutations, the factors that determine base editing outcomes are not well understood. We characterized sequence-activity relationships of 11 cytosine and adenine base editors (CBEs and ABEs) on 38,538 genomically integrated targets in mammalian cells and used the resulting outcomes to train BE-Hive, a machine learning model that accurately predicts base editing genotypic outcomes (R ≈ 0.9) and efficiency (R ≈ 0.7). We corrected 3,388 disease-associated SNVs with ≥90% precision, including 675 alleles with bystander nucleotides that BE-Hive correctly predicted would not be edited. We discovered determinants of previously unpredictable C-to-G, or C-to-A editing and used these discoveries to correct coding sequences of 174 pathogenic transversion SNVs with ≥90% precision. Finally, we used insights from BE-Hive to engineer novel CBE variants that modulate editing outcomes. These discoveries illuminate base editing, enable editing at previously intractable targets, and provide new base editors with improved editing capabilities.Entities:
Keywords: base editing; disease correction; machine learning; precision genome editing; transversion base editing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32533916 PMCID: PMC7384975 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.037
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell ISSN: 0092-8674 Impact factor: 41.582