Literature DB >> 27120160

Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.

Dominik Paquet1, Dylan Kwart1, Antonia Chen1, Andrew Sproul2, Samson Jacob2, Shaun Teo1, Kimberly Moore Olsen1, Andrew Gregg1,3, Scott Noggle2, Marc Tessier-Lavigne1.   

Abstract

The bacterial CRISPR/Cas9 system allows sequence-specific gene editing in many organisms and holds promise as a tool to generate models of human diseases, for example, in human pluripotent stem cells. CRISPR/Cas9 introduces targeted double-stranded breaks (DSBs) with high efficiency, which are typically repaired by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) resulting in nonspecific insertions, deletions or other mutations (indels). DSBs may also be repaired by homology-directed repair (HDR) using a DNA repair template, such as an introduced single-stranded oligo DNA nucleotide (ssODN), allowing knock-in of specific mutations. Although CRISPR/Cas9 is used extensively to engineer gene knockouts through NHEJ, editing by HDR remains inefficient and can be corrupted by additional indels, preventing its widespread use for modelling genetic disorders through introducing disease-associated mutations. Furthermore, targeted mutational knock-in at single alleles to model diseases caused by heterozygous mutations has not been reported. Here we describe a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing framework that allows selective introduction of mono- and bi-allelic sequence changes with high efficiency and accuracy. We show that HDR accuracy is increased dramatically by incorporating silent CRISPR/Cas-blocking mutations along with pathogenic mutations, and establish a method termed 'CORRECT' for scarless genome editing. By characterizing and exploiting a stereotyped inverse relationship between a mutation's incorporation rate and its distance to the DSB, we achieve predictable control of zygosity. Homozygous introduction requires a guide RNA targeting close to the intended mutation, whereas heterozygous introduction can be accomplished by distance-dependent suboptimal mutation incorporation or by use of mixed repair templates. Using this approach, we generated human induced pluripotent stem cells with heterozygous and homozygous dominant early onset Alzheimer's disease-causing mutations in amyloid precursor protein (APP(Swe)) and presenilin 1 (PSEN1(M146V)) and derived cortical neurons, which displayed genotype-dependent disease-associated phenotypes. Our findings enable efficient introduction of specific sequence changes with CRISPR/Cas9, facilitating study of human disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27120160     DOI: 10.1038/nature17664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  47 in total

1.  Comparison of DNA sequences with protein sequences.

Authors:  W R Pearson; T Wood; Z Zhang; W Miller
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 5.736

2.  A mutation in APP protects against Alzheimer's disease and age-related cognitive decline.

Authors:  Thorlakur Jonsson; Jasvinder K Atwal; Stacy Steinberg; Jon Snaedal; Palmi V Jonsson; Sigurbjorn Bjornsson; Hreinn Stefansson; Patrick Sulem; Daniel Gudbjartsson; Janice Maloney; Kwame Hoyte; Amy Gustafson; Yichin Liu; Yanmei Lu; Tushar Bhangale; Robert R Graham; Johanna Huttenlocher; Gyda Bjornsdottir; Ole A Andreassen; Erik G Jönsson; Aarno Palotie; Timothy W Behrens; Olafur T Magnusson; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Ryan J Watts; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Modeling familial Alzheimer's disease with induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Takuya Yagi; Daisuke Ito; Yohei Okada; Wado Akamatsu; Yoshihiro Nihei; Takahito Yoshizaki; Shinya Yamanaka; Hideyuki Okano; Norihiro Suzuki
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Chen Yu; Yanxia Liu; Tianhua Ma; Kai Liu; Shaohua Xu; Yu Zhang; Honglei Liu; Marie La Russa; Min Xie; Sheng Ding; Lei S Qi
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 5.  Animal models of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Jürgen Götz; Lars M Ittner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Regulation of Gene Editing Activity Directed by Single-Stranded Oligonucleotides and CRISPR/Cas9 Systems.

Authors:  Pawel Bialk; Natalia Rivera-Torres; Bryan Strouse; Eric B Kmiec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Swedish mutation causes early-onset Alzheimer's disease by beta-secretase cleavage within the secretory pathway.

Authors:  C Haass; C A Lemere; A Capell; M Citron; P Seubert; D Schenk; L Lannfelt; D J Selkoe
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing.

Authors:  Luhan Yang; Marc Guell; Susan Byrne; Joyce L Yang; Alejandro De Los Angeles; Prashant Mali; John Aach; Caroline Kim-Kiselak; Adrian W Briggs; Xavier Rios; Po-Yi Huang; George Daley; George Church
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Characterization and molecular profiling of PSEN1 familial Alzheimer's disease iPSC-derived neural progenitors.

Authors:  Andrew A Sproul; Samson Jacob; Deborah Pre; Soong Ho Kim; Michael W Nestor; Miriam Navarro-Sobrino; Ismael Santa-Maria; Matthew Zimmer; Soline Aubry; John W Steele; David J Kahler; Alex Dranovsky; Ottavio Arancio; John F Crary; Sam Gandy; Scott A Noggle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Probing sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease using induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Mason A Israel; Shauna H Yuan; Cedric Bardy; Sol M Reyna; Yangling Mu; Cheryl Herrera; Michael P Hefferan; Sebastiaan Van Gorp; Kristopher L Nazor; Francesca S Boscolo; Christian T Carson; Louise C Laurent; Martin Marsala; Fred H Gage; Anne M Remes; Edward H Koo; Lawrence S B Goldstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  311 in total

1.  Very fast CRISPR on demand.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Roger S Zou; Shuaixin He; Yuta Nihongaki; Xiaoguang Li; Shiva Razavi; Bin Wu; Taekjip Ha
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Mapping a diversity of genetic interactions in yeast.

Authors:  Jolanda van Leeuwen; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2017-08-12

3.  Simultaneous reprogramming and gene editing of human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Sara E Howden; James A Thomson; Melissa H Little
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants.

Authors:  Max W Shen; Mandana Arbab; Jonathan Y Hsu; Daniel Worstell; Sannie J Culbertson; Olga Krabbe; Christopher A Cassa; David R Liu; David K Gifford; Richard I Sherwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A Facile Method to Engineer Mutant Kras Alleles in an Isogenic Cell Background.

Authors:  Konstantin Budagyan; Jonathan Chernoff
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 6.  Are Tanycytes the Missing Link Between Type 2 Diabetes and Alzheimer's Disease?

Authors:  Sudhanshu P Raikwar; Sachin M Bhagavan; Swathi Beladakere Ramaswamy; Ramasamy Thangavel; Iuliia Dubova; Govindhasamy Pushpavathi Selvakumar; Mohammad Ejaz Ahmed; Duraisamy Kempuraj; Smita Zaheer; Shankar Iyer; Asgar Zaheer
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.590

7.  Initiation of Parental Genome Reprogramming in Fertilized Oocyte by Splicing Kinase SRPK1-Catalyzed Protamine Phosphorylation.

Authors:  Lan-Tao Gou; Do-Hwan Lim; Wubin Ma; Brandon E Aubol; Yajing Hao; Xin Wang; Jun Zhao; Zhengyu Liang; Changwei Shao; Xuan Zhang; Fan Meng; Hairi Li; Xiaorong Zhang; Ruiming Xu; Dangsheng Li; Michael G Rosenfeld; Pamela L Mellon; Joseph A Adams; Mo-Fang Liu; Xiang-Dong Fu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  High-Throughput Imaging for the Discovery of Cellular Mechanisms of Disease.

Authors:  Gianluca Pegoraro; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Highly Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Jean Ann Maguire; Fabian L Cardenas-Diaz; Paul Gadue; Deborah L French
Journal:  Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 10.  In vivo epigenome editing and transcriptional modulation using CRISPR technology.

Authors:  Cia-Hin Lau; Yousin Suh
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.788

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.