Literature DB >> 33398158

PAM-less plant genome editing using a CRISPR-SpRY toolbox.

Qiurong Ren1, Simon Sretenovic2, Shishi Liu1, Xu Tang1, Lan Huang1, Yao He1, Li Liu1, Yachong Guo1, Zhaohui Zhong1, Guanqing Liu3, Yanhao Cheng2, Xuelian Zheng1, Changtian Pan2, Desuo Yin2, Yingxiao Zhang2, Wanfeng Li4, Liwang Qi4, Chenghao Li5, Yiping Qi6,7, Yong Zhang8.   

Abstract

The rapid development of the CRISPR-Cas9, -Cas12a and -Cas12b genome editing systems has greatly fuelled basic and translational plant research1-6. DNA targeting by these Cas nucleases is restricted by their preferred protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs). The PAM requirement for the most popular Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 (SpCas9) is NGG (N = A, T, C, G)7, limiting its targeting scope to GC-rich regions. Here, we demonstrate genome editing at relaxed PAM sites in rice (a monocot) and the Dahurian larch (a coniferous tree), using an engineered SpRY Cas9 variant8. Highly efficient targeted mutagenesis can be readily achieved by SpRY at relaxed PAM sites in the Dahurian larch protoplasts and in rice transgenic lines through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Furthermore, an SpRY-based cytosine base editor was developed and demonstrated by directed evolution of new herbicide resistant OsALS alleles in rice. Similarly, a highly active SpRY adenine base editor was developed based on ABE8e (ref. 9) and SpRY-ABE8e was able to target relaxed PAM sites in rice plants, achieving up to 79% editing efficiency with high product purity. Thus, the SpRY toolbox breaks a PAM restriction barrier in plant genome engineering by enabling DNA editing in a PAM-less fashion. Evidence was also provided for secondary off-target effects by de novo generated single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) due to SpRY-mediated transfer DNA self-editing, which calls for more sophisticated programmes for designing highly specific sgRNAs when implementing the SpRY genome editing toolbox.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33398158     DOI: 10.1038/s41477-020-00827-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Plants        ISSN: 2055-0278            Impact factor:   15.793


  39 in total

Review 1.  The emerging and uncultivated potential of CRISPR technology in plant science.

Authors:  Yingxiao Zhang; Aimee A Malzahn; Simon Sretenovic; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 2.  Applications of CRISPR-Cas in agriculture and plant biotechnology.

Authors:  Haocheng Zhu; Chao Li; Caixia Gao
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 3.  CRISPR/Cas brings plant biology and breeding into the fast lane.

Authors:  Angelina Schindele; Annika Dorn; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 9.740

4.  Serum and cell-mediated viral-specific delayed cutaneous basophil reactions during cytomegalovirus infection of guinea pigs.

Authors:  B P Griffith; P W Askenase; G D Hsiung
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1982-05-01       Impact factor: 4.868

5.  Highly efficient heritable plant genome engineering using Cas9 orthologues from Streptococcus thermophilus and Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Jeannette Steinert; Simon Schiml; Friedrich Fauser; Holger Puchta
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  CRISPR-Cas12b enables efficient plant genome engineering.

Authors:  Meiling Ming; Qiurong Ren; Changtian Pan; Yao He; Yingxiao Zhang; Shishi Liu; Zhaohui Zhong; Jiaheng Wang; Aimee A Malzahn; Jun Wu; Xuelian Zheng; Yong Zhang; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants.

Authors:  Russell T Walton; Kathleen A Christie; Madelynn N Whittaker; Benjamin P Kleinstiver
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants.

Authors:  Xu Tang; Levi G Lowder; Tao Zhang; Aimee A Malzahn; Xuelian Zheng; Daniel F Voytas; Zhaohui Zhong; Yiyi Chen; Qiurong Ren; Qian Li; Elida R Kirkland; Yong Zhang; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 15.793

9.  A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice.

Authors:  Xu Tang; Guanqing Liu; Jianping Zhou; Qiurong Ren; Qi You; Li Tian; Xuhui Xin; Zhaohui Zhong; Binglin Liu; Xuelian Zheng; Dengwei Zhang; Aimee Malzahn; Zhiyun Gong; Yiping Qi; Tao Zhang; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity.

Authors:  Michelle F Richter; Kevin T Zhao; Elliot Eton; Audrone Lapinaite; Gregory A Newby; Benjamin W Thuronyi; Christopher Wilson; Luke W Koblan; Jing Zeng; Daniel E Bauer; Jennifer A Doudna; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  32 in total

1.  CRISPR-Act3.0 for highly efficient multiplexed gene activation in plants.

Authors:  Changtian Pan; Xincheng Wu; Kasey Markel; Aimee A Malzahn; Neil Kundagrami; Simon Sretenovic; Yingxiao Zhang; Yanhao Cheng; Patrick M Shih; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 15.793

Review 2.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Boosting plant genome editing with a versatile CRISPR-Combo system.

Authors:  Changtian Pan; Gen Li; Aimee A Malzahn; Yanhao Cheng; Benjamin Leyson; Simon Sretenovic; Filiz Gurel; Gary D Coleman; Yiping Qi
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 17.352

4.  SpG and SpRY variants expand the CRISPR toolbox for genome editing in zebrafish.

Authors:  Fang Liang; Yu Zhang; Lin Li; Yexin Yang; Ji-Feng Fei; Yanmei Liu; Wei Qin
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 17.694

5.  Dissecting cis-regulatory control of quantitative trait variation in a plant stem cell circuit.

Authors:  Xingang Wang; Lyndsey Aguirre; Daniel Rodríguez-Leal; Anat Hendelman; Matthias Benoit; Zachary B Lippman
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Efficient deletion of multiple circle RNA loci by CRISPR-Cas9 reveals Os06circ02797 as a putative sponge for OsMIR408 in rice.

Authors:  Jianping Zhou; Mingzhu Yuan; Yuxin Zhao; Quan Quan; Dong Yu; Han Yang; Xu Tang; Xuhui Xin; Guangze Cai; Qian Qian; Yiping Qi; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 9.803

7.  Plant genome editing branches out.

Authors:  Logan T Hille; Benjamin P Kleinstiver
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 17.352

8.  ABE8e with Polycistronic tRNA-gRNA Expression Cassette Sig-Nificantly Improves Adenine Base Editing Efficiency in Nicotiana benthamiana.

Authors:  Zupeng Wang; Xiaoying Liu; Xiaodong Xie; Lei Deng; Hao Zheng; Hui Pan; Dawei Li; Li Li; Caihong Zhong
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Next Generation Cereal Crop Yield Enhancement: From Knowledge of Inflorescence Development to Practical Engineering by Genome Editing.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Penelope L Lindsay; David Jackson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Applications and Major Achievements of Genome Editing in Vegetable Crops: A Review.

Authors:  Young-Cheon Kim; Yeeun Kang; Eun-Young Yang; Myeong-Cheoul Cho; Roland Schafleitner; Jeong Hwan Lee; Seonghoe Jang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.