Literature DB >> 34183861

Efficient C•G-to-G•C base editors developed using CRISPRi screens, target-library analysis, and machine learning.

Luke W Koblan1,2,3, Mandana Arbab1,2,3, Max W Shen1,2,3,4, Jeffrey A Hussmann5,6,7,8,9, Andrew V Anzalone1,2,3, Jordan L Doman1,2,3, Gregory A Newby1,2,3, Dian Yang5,7,8,9, Beverly Mok1,2,3, Joseph M Replogle5,7,10,11,8,9, Albert Xu5,6,10,12, Tyler A Sisley2, Jonathan S Weissman13,14,15,16,17, Britt Adamson18,19,20,21, David R Liu22,23,24.   

Abstract

Programmable C•G-to-G•C base editors (CGBEs) have broad scientific and therapeutic potential, but their editing outcomes have proved difficult to predict and their editing efficiency and product purity are often low. We describe a suite of engineered CGBEs paired with machine learning models to enable efficient, high-purity C•G-to-G•C base editing. We performed a CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) screen targeting DNA repair genes to identify factors that affect C•G-to-G•C editing outcomes and used these insights to develop CGBEs with diverse editing profiles. We characterized ten promising CGBEs on a library of 10,638 genomically integrated target sites in mammalian cells and trained machine learning models that accurately predict the purity and yield of editing outcomes (R = 0.90) using these data. These CGBEs enable correction to the wild-type coding sequence of 546 disease-related transversion single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) with >90% precision (mean 96%) and up to 70% efficiency (mean 14%). Computational prediction of optimal CGBE-single-guide RNA pairs enables high-purity transversion base editing at over fourfold more target sites than achieved using any single CGBE variant.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34183861      PMCID: PMC8985520          DOI: 10.1038/s41587-021-00938-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  39 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors.

Authors:  Andrew V Anzalone; Luke W Koblan; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Physical fitness: fun and games.

Authors:  B D Epstein
Journal:  J Fla Med Assoc       Date:  1980-04

3.  Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems.

Authors:  Keiji Nishida; Takayuki Arazoe; Nozomu Yachie; Satomi Banno; Mika Kakimoto; Mayura Tabata; Masao Mochizuki; Aya Miyabe; Michihiro Araki; Kiyotaka Y Hara; Zenpei Shimatani; Akihiko Kondo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells.

Authors:  Holly A Rees; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Directed evolution of adenine base editors with increased activity and therapeutic application.

Authors:  Nicole M Gaudelli; Dieter K Lam; Holly A Rees; Noris M Solá-Esteves; Luis A Barrera; David A Born; Aaron Edwards; Jason M Gehrke; Seung-Joo Lee; Alexander J Liquori; Ryan Murray; Michael S Packer; Conrad Rinaldi; Ian M Slaymaker; Jonathan Yen; Lauren E Young; Giuseppe Ciaramella
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Nicole M Gaudelli; Alexis C Komor; Holly A Rees; Michael S Packer; Ahmed H Badran; David I Bryson; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities.

Authors:  Jason M Gehrke; Oliver Cervantes; M Kendell Clement; Yuxuan Wu; Jing Zeng; Daniel E Bauer; Luca Pinello; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.

Authors:  Melissa J Landrum; Jennifer M Lee; Mark Benson; Garth Brown; Chen Chao; Shanmuga Chitipiralla; Baoshan Gu; Jennifer Hart; Douglas Hoffman; Jeffrey Hoover; Wonhee Jang; Kenneth Katz; Michael Ovetsky; George Riley; Amanjeev Sethi; Ray Tully; Ricardo Villamarin-Salomon; Wendy Rubinstein; Donna R Maglott
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage.

Authors:  Alexis C Komor; Yongjoo B Kim; Michael S Packer; John A Zuris; David R Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity.

Authors:  Michelle F Richter; Kevin T Zhao; Elliot Eton; Audrone Lapinaite; Gregory A Newby; Benjamin W Thuronyi; Christopher Wilson; Luke W Koblan; Jing Zeng; Daniel E Bauer; Jennifer A Doudna; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 54.908

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR in cancer biology and therapy.

Authors:  Alyna Katti; Bianca J Diaz; Christina M Caragine; Neville E Sanjana; Lukas E Dow
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Pathways to de novo domestication of crop wild relatives.

Authors:  Shaun Curtin; Yiping Qi; Lázaro E P Peres; Alisdair R Fernie; Agustin Zsögön
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants.

Authors:  Kai Hua; Peijin Han; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Designing and executing prime editing experiments in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Jordan L Doman; Alexander A Sousa; Peyton B Randolph; Peter J Chen; David R Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 17.021

Review 5.  Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents.

Authors:  Aditya Raguram; Samagya Banskota; David R Liu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 66.850

6.  A precise and efficient adenine base editor.

Authors:  Tianxiang Tu; Zongming Song; Xiaoyu Liu; Shengxing Wang; Xiaoxue He; Haitao Xi; Jiahua Wang; Tong Yan; Haoran Chen; Zhenwu Zhang; Xiujuan Lv; Jineng Lv; Xiu-Feng Huang; Junzhao Zhao; Chao-Po Lin; Caixia Gao; Jinwei Zhang; Feng Gu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  Internally inlaid SaCas9 base editors enable window specific base editing.

Authors:  Lurong Jiang; Jie Long; Yang Yang; Lifang Zhou; Jing Su; Fengming Qin; Wenling Tang; Rui Tao; Qiang Chen; Shaohua Yao
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 11.600

Review 8.  CRISPR-based genome editing through the lens of DNA repair.

Authors:  Tarun S Nambiar; Lou Baudrier; Pierre Billon; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Towards a CRISPeR understanding of homologous recombination with high-throughput functional genomics.

Authors:  Samuel B Hayward; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 10.  In vivo somatic cell base editing and prime editing.

Authors:  Gregory A Newby; David R Liu
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 11.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.