| Literature DB >> 32531908 |
Elba Mauriz1,2.
Abstract
The monitoring of biomarkers in body fluids provides valuable prognostic information regarding disease onset and progression. Most biosensing approaches use noninvasive screening tools and are conducted in order to improve early clinical diagnosis. However, biofouling of the sensing surface may disturb the quantification of circulating biomarkers in complex biological fluids. Thus, there is a great need for antifouling interfaces to be designed in order to reduce nonspecific adsorption and prevent inactivation of biological receptors and loss of sensitivity. To address these limitations and enable their application in clinical practice, a variety of plasmonic platforms have been recently developed for biomarker analysis in easily accessible biological fluids. This review presents an overview of the latest advances in the design of antifouling strategies for the detection of clinically relevant biomarkers on the basis of the characteristics of biological samples. The impact of nanoplasmonic biosensors as point-of-care devices has been examined for a wide range of biomarkers associated with cancer, inflammatory, infectious and neurodegenerative diseases. Clinical applications in readily obtainable biofluids such as blood, saliva, urine, tears and cerebrospinal and synovial fluids, covering almost the whole range of plasmonic applications, from surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: LSPR; SERS; SPR; biological fluids; circulating biomarkers; low-fouling; nanoplasmonics
Year: 2020 PMID: 32531908 PMCID: PMC7345924 DOI: 10.3390/bios10060063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Clinical (plasma/serum/saliva/urine) biomarkers, including virus particles, nucleic acids, proteins and antibodies, that can be monitored by surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based biosensors. The scheme in the box below represents a plasmonic sensing system based on the Kretschmann configuration. The incident light passes through a glass prism before being reflected by the sensing surface and captured by a detector. The refractive index at the interface and the surface plasmon wave frequency will change upon the binding of analytes. The amount of bound molecules can be measured in real time at a fixed incident angle or by tracking angle–SPR-resolved responses. The inset in the background depicts the generation of a surface plasmon wave that will propagate along the conductor–dielectric interface upon interaction with an incident plane-polarized light. Adapted with permission from Fehran et al. [10] (Copyright © (2018) Elsevier), Rapisuwon et al. [5] (under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons CC BY License) and Chen et al. [15] (Copyright © (2019) Elsevier).
Figure 2(a) Representation of the localized surface plasmon on nanoparticles and absorbance spectra obtained for binding events on nanoparticles. (b) Schematic diagram depicting the electromagnetic enhancement of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS). Incoming radiation of resonant wavelength (hνexc) interacts with the nanoparticle, exciting a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR). The near-field interaction between the Raman scatterer (i.e., analyte) and the plasmonic nanostructure increases the intensity of the scattered light (hνscat). Adapted with permission from Masson et al. [24] (Copyright © (2020) Royal Society of Chemistry) and Strobbia et al. [17] (under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons CC BY License).
Figure 3(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of an array of nanoholes in a gold film; (b) experimental setup of a plasmonic-based nanohole array biosensor. Adapted with permission from Gordon et al. [29] (Copyright © (2008) American Chemical Society).
Figure 4Illustration of chain hydration and chain flexibility of (a) hydrophilic polymers, (b) zwitterionic polymers and (c) SAMs, which have different attributes of surface resistance and nonspecific protein adsorption. Reproduced with permission from Chen et al. [42] (Copyright © (2010) Elsevier).
Key analytical features of clinical diagnostics by plasmonic biosensors classified according to the characteristics of biological samples, detection format (namely instrument configuration or biological receptor) and sensitivity or detection range.
| Biofluid | Detection Format (Instrument Configuration/Biological Receptor) | Antifouling Strategy/Sample Dilution | Detection Range/LOD | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood (serum, plasma) | ||||
| Nucleic acids | ||||
| MicroRNA | SPR (gold nanoparticles) | DNA tetrahedron probes/ | 0.8 fM (miRNA-429, random miRNA) | [40] |
| SPR (near-dispersionless microfluidic system) | Copolymer brushes: zwitterionic carboxybetaine and chains of OEG-SAMs/ | 0.6 nM (miRNA16) | [59] | |
| SPRi (orthogonal signal amplification) | CYTOP fluoropolymer/ | 3.46–10.5 fM (cancer and healthy 40% diluted serum); | [60] | |
| SERS (Ag/Au nanospheres-based probes) | Target-catalyzed hairpin assembly/ | 0.306 fM/1 fM to 10 nM (miR-133a) | [61] | |
| Circulating tumor DNA | LSPR (gold nanorods) | Spiked healthy patient serum | 2 ng mL−1 | [62] |
| Circulating tumor cells | SPR (grating coupled fluorescence imaging/antibody imprinting) | BSA 2% blocking/ | N/A | [65] |
| LSPR (enhanced electrochemistry, gold nanostars, aptamers) | Glassy carbon electrode | 5 to 10 cells/mL | [66] | |
| Exosomes | SPRi (AuNPs/antibody) | Incubation in 1% ( | 104 particles/μL | [68] |
| SPRi (array of antibodies) | Carboxylated PEGs/ | N/A (increased the signal response from 5% to 20%) | [69] | |
| Cancer-Related Proteins | ||||
|
PSA | SPR (fiber optic, nanopatterned enhancement/antibody) | Diluted serum samples 1:13/ | 0.1 pg mL−1 | [71] |
| SPR (direct detection/antibody) | Serum samples diluted serially to 1:10, 1:100, 1:1000 and 1:10,000 times (rabbit serum samples) | N/A (protein content in serum samples) | [72] | |
|
CEA | SPR (Biofunctional gold nanoparticles, sandwich assay/antibodies) | Plasma diluted to 30% with PBS/BSA. | N/A | [73] |
| SPR (carbon nanotube (MWCNTs)-polydopamine (PDA)-Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs), sandwich assay/polyclonal antibody) | Carbide nanosheets of Ti3C2-MXene/ | 0.07 fM | [74] | |
|
Alpha fetoprotein | SPR sandwich assay, direct detection/antibody) | Serum spiked samples | Concentration | [75] |
| SERS (antibody) | Diluted blood serum (1:250)/ | 0.078 ng mL−1 ng/mL (AFP-L3) | [76] | |
|
CA125/MUC16 ovarian tumor biomarker | SPRi (cystamine linker/antibody) | Diluted Serum/ | 2.2–150 U/mL | [77] |
|
Cytokeratin 19 fragment | SPR (carboxyl-functionalized molybdenum disulfide nanocomposites/antibody) | Different spiked ratios of spiked serum samples (16.6%–0%) | 0.05 pg mL−1 (6.25%) | [78] |
|
Folic acid | SPR (graphene-on-metal interfaces/folic acid receptors) | Immersion of folic receptors in mixtures of human serum and bovine serum albumin (BSA) with a volume ratio (1:1). | 10–800 fM | [79] |
| Alzheimer biomarkers | ||||
|
Amyloid beta 1–42 (Aβ42) | SPRi (peptoid nanosheet/antibody-mimetic) | Dilution ratios (1:2000 to 1:64,000) | 1–10,000 pM | [81] |
|
Protein Tau | SPR (Sandwich assay/aptamer-antibody) | Alkanethiol mixtures and PEG molecules/ | 50 fM (Tau-381) | [82] |
| Inflammation biomarkers | ||||
|
Interleukins | SPRi (citrate-stabilized Fe3O4@Au core/shell nanoparticles (NPs)/sandwich antibody–antigen-antibody) | Iron oxide/gold core/shell nanomaterial/ | 10 pM–100 nM (IL-6) | [28] |
| Infectious agents | ||||
|
Hepatitis B | SPR (antigen HBsAg) | Copolymer poly[(N-(2-hydro-xypropyl) methacrylamide)-co-(carboxybetaine methacrylamide)] brush/ | 0.0002 to <1 IUmL−1 | [85] |
|
Brucella | SPR (4-mercaptobenzoic acid (4-MBA)/DNA probes) | Real serum samples 1:6400 dilution, 10 donors | 15.3–54.9 pM (DNA probes of IS711 gene) | [86] |
| Saliva | ||||
| Cortisol | LSPR (gold nanoparticles of different sizes/aptamer) | Centrifuged and filtered real saliva samples | 0.01 nM | [91] |
| Hepatitis B | SPR (amplified fluorescence/hepatitis B surface antigen) | Brushes of poly[(N-(2-hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide)-co-(carboxybetaine methacrylamide)]/ | 0.01 to >1 IU/mL | [92] |
| Metalloproteinase-9 | SPR (immunosensor/antibody) | Carboxymethyldextran hydrogel/ | 8 pg mL−1 (0.087 pM) | [93] |
| ABH antigens | SPRi (multiplex format, sandwich assay anti-A, anti-B and anti-H antibodies) | Carboxymethyldextran, 64 real saliva samples/ | N/A precision at 0.06%–4.9% CV. | [94] |
| Urine | ||||
| Glucose | SPR fiber optic (phenylboronic-acid-modified Au nanoparticles) | Spiked urinary samples | 2.8 mM | [96] |
| Human serum albumin | SPR (gold nanoparticles) | Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and N-methacryloyl- | 1.9 pM | [97] |
| MicroRNA | t-SPR (transmission surface plasmon resonance, capped gold (CG) | Spiked healthy volunteers samples | 30 fM (monitoring probes (I, II, III and R) | [98] |
| 3-Nitrotyrosine | SPR (immunosensor, indirect competitive immunoassay/3NT-OVA conjugates) | Artificial urine, spiked human urine samples | 0.12 μg mL−1 | [99] |
| Gluten immunogenic peptid (33-mer α2-gliadin) | SPR (indirect competitive assay/gluten immunogenic peptid) | BSA 10 mg mL−1 2 min blocking/ | 1.6–4.0 ng mL−1 | [100] |
| Cerebrospinal Fluid | ||||
| Dopamine | SPR (multiwalled carbon nanotubes/electrostatic interactions) | Polypyrrole polymer imprinting dopamine cation exchange polymer, nafion/ | 18.9 pM | [101] |
| Synovial Fluid | ||||
| Interleukins | SPRi (multiplex format/antibody sandwich cascade) | Spiked equine and human patient samples | 2 fM (IL-1β and IL-6) | [26] |
| Tears | ||||
| Lysozyme and lactoferrin | LSPR (silica gold nanoshells/electrostatic attraction) | Poly(N isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) (PNM) hydrogels/ | N/A | [103] |
Figure 5(a) Schematic illustration of low-fouling SPR biosensor for high-sensitivity detection of miRNA in complex matrix based on DNA tetrahedron. (b) Effect of surface density of DNA tetrahedron probes (DTPs) on nonspecific adsorption (the amount of protein adsorption decreased with the increase of surface density until the surface density of 5.22 × 1012 molecules per cm2 in 100% serum and 100% plasma). (c) Detection of let-7a in 100% human serum (green histogram) and buffer (red histogram). Adapted with permission from Nie et al. [40] (Copyright © (2018) American Chemical Society).
Figure 6(a) Schematic representation showing the detection procedure of the SPR biosensor consisting of a Ti3C2-MXene-based sensing platform and a multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT)–polydopamine (PDA)–Ag nanoparticle (AgNP) signal enhancer (Ab: antibody; APA: staphylococcal protein A). (b) Analytical results of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in human serum. Adapted with permission from Wu et al. [74] (Copyright © (2019) Elsevier).
Figure 7(a) Scheme of the synthesis route of single-layer MoS2; (b) single-layer carboxyl-MoS2 nanocomposites; (c) the carboxyl-MoS2-based SPR chip; (d) the carboxyl-MoS2-based SPR sensing mechanism to detect the lung cancer biomarker CYFRA21-1. SPR sensorgrams were analyzed for the CYFRA21-1 protein in spiked human serum samples using the carboxyl-MoS2-based chip, showing (e) different serum concentrations that were used to assess interference analysis during the test and (f) comparisons of different serum ratios in SPR biosensing for interference analysis. Adapted with permission from Chiu et al. [78] (under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons CC BY License).
Figure 8(a) Schematic illustration of the detection of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) serum by loop-displaying peptoid nanosheets in combination with 3D surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) sensor chip. The AD peptoid 3 (ADP3) loop-displaying peptoid nanosheets were immobilized on the 3D sensor chip with carboxylated poly(OEGMA-co-HEMA) brushes fabricated on the gold surface by surface-induced polymerization (SIP). As the serum sample flow passed through the chip, Aβ42 in the serum was captured by the ADP3 loop in the nanosheet, generating SPRi binding signals. (b) Evaluation of the sensitivity of the ADP3 loop-displaying peptoid nanosheets to detect AD sera. SPRi binding signals of nanosheets with 100% ADP3 loop to AD and normal sera at different dilution ratios are shown. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 14). (c) Representative SPRi sensorgram showing the binding of nanosheets with 100% ADP3 loop to AD serum at different dilution ratios. Reproduced with permission from Zhu et al. [81] (Copyright © (2017) WILEY-VCH).
Figure 9(a) SPR procedure for ABH antigen detection in saliva. (b,c) SPR sensorgrams of ABH antigen detection in red blood cells (direct assay) (b) and saliva (sandwich assay) (c). Adapted with permission from Peungthum et al. [94] (Copyright (2017) © Royal Society of Chemistry).