Literature DB >> 32509912

Preoperative prediction of angular insertion depth of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Mohammad M R Khan1, Robert F Labadie2, Jack H Noble1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Cochlear implants (CIs) use an array of electrodes surgically threaded into the cochlea to restore hearing sensation. Techniques for predicting the insertion depth of the array into the cochlea could guide surgeons toward more optimal placement of the array to reduce trauma and preserve the residual hearing. In addition to the electrode array geometry, the base insertion depth (BID) and the cochlear size could impact the overall array insertion depth. Approach: We investigated using these measurements to develop a linear regression model that can make preoperative or intraoperative predictions of the insertion depth of lateral wall CI electrodes. Computed tomography (CT) images of 86 CI recipients were analyzed. Using previously developed automated algorithms, the relative electrode position inside the cochlea was measured from the CT images.
Results: A linear regression model is proposed for insertion depth prediction based on cochlea size, array geometry, and BID. The model is able to accurately predict angular insertion depths with a standard deviation of 41 deg and absolute deviation error of 32 deg. Conclusions: Surgeons may use this model for patient-customized selection of electrode array and/or to plan a BID for a given array that minimizes the likelihood of causing trauma to regions of the cochlea where residual hearing exists.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  angular insertion depth; cochlear implant; image-guided cochlear implantation; lateral wall electrode arrays; straight electrode arrays

Year:  2020        PMID: 32509912      PMCID: PMC7269369          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.3.031504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  29 in total

1.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  J Xu; S A Xu; L T Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

2.  Predicting basal cochlear length for electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Marc H Unkelbach; Martin G Mack; Andreas Radeloff; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-06

3.  Cochlear Implant Insertion Depth Prediction: A Temporal Bone Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Lukas Anschuetz; Stefan Weder; Georgios Mantokoudis; Martin Kompis; Marco Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Analysis of Different Approaches for Clinical Cochlear Coverage Evaluation After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Daniel Schurzig; Max Eike Timm; Cornelia Batsoulis; Samuel John; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27

6.  Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Joseph B Nadol; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Clinical Applicability of a Preoperative Angular Insertion Depth Prediction Method for Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Christoph Rathgeb; Marco Demattè; Abraam Yacoub; Lukas Anschuetz; Franca Wagner; Georgios Mantokoudis; Marco Caversaccio; Wilhelm Wimmer
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  A Novel Method for Clinical Cochlear Duct Length Estimation toward Patient-Specific Cochlear Implant Selection.

Authors:  Daniel Schurzig; Max Eike Timm; Cornelia Batsoulis; Rolf Salcher; Daniel Sieber; Claude Jolly; Thomas Lenarz; Masoud Zoka-Assadi
Journal:  OTO Open       Date:  2018-10-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Hybrid active shape and deep learning method for the accurate and robust segmentation of the intracochlear anatomy in clinical head CT and CBCT images.

Authors:  Yubo Fan; Dongqing Zhang; Rueben Banalagay; Jianing Wang; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 2.  Advances in hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Osama Tarabichi; Megan Jensen; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.814

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.