Literature DB >> 15967880

Predicting basal cochlear length for electric-acoustic stimulation.

Oliver Adunka1, Marc H Unkelbach, Martin G Mack, Andreas Radeloff, Wolfgang Gstoettner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of predicting electrode insertion depth necessary in cochlear implantations for electric-acoustic stimulation by means of preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).
DESIGN: Human temporal bone study with evaluation of cochlear dimensions.
SETTING: Tertiary care medical center.
METHODS: Eight fresh human temporal bones were scanned, and basal cochlear structures were reconstructed and measured. Standard cochlear implantations with a free-fitting array were performed, and the bones then underwent histologic analysis using a technique that allows sectioning of undecalcified bones. After embedding, all bones underwent conventional radiologic analysis with further insertion measurements. Preimplantation HRCT data were compared with radiologic and histologic data.
RESULTS: Preimplantation HRCT-based measurements correlated very well with postimplantation radiologic data. A mean failure of 0.3 mm was found. Mean values for the first 360 degrees ranged from 18.8 to 22.0 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Preimplantation HRCT-based prediction of cochlear implant insertion depths is both feasible and accurate. It is especially useful when aiming for hearing preservation, where insertion depths of 360 degrees are necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967880     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.131.6.488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  12 in total

1.  Automatic Cochlear Duct Length Estimation for Selection of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

Authors:  Alejandro Rivas; Ahmet Cakir; Jacob B Hunter; Robert F Labadie; M Geraldine Zuniga; George B Wanna; Benoit M Dawant; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  [Hearing with combined electric acoustic stimulation].

Authors:  U Baumann; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Topography of neurovascular structures in relation to round window and how it relates to cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Anjali Singla; Tulika Gupta; Daisy Sahni; Ashok Kumar Gupta; Anjali Aggarwal
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Daniel Schurzig; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Preoperative prediction of angular insertion depth of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Mohammad M R Khan; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-06-03

6.  On the accuracy of cochlear duct length measurement in computed tomographic images.

Authors:  G Jakob Lexow; Marcel Kluge; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani; Thomas S Rau
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

Review 8.  Measuring Cochlear Duct Length - a historical analysis of methods and results.

Authors:  Robert W Koch; Hanif M Ladak; Mai Elfarnawany; Sumit K Agrawal
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-07

9.  Comment on "The Effect of Cochlear Size on Cochlear Implantation Outcomes".

Authors:  M Bilgin Eser; Başak Atalay; M Tayyar Kalcıoğlu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Patient specific selection of lateral wall cochlear implant electrodes based on anatomical indication ranges.

Authors:  Max Eike Timm; Omid Majdani; Tobias Weller; Mayra Windeler; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner; Rolf Benedikt Salcher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.