BACKGROUND: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of framework type on the survival probability of temporary implant-supported crowns and on the implant platform structure after dynamic fatigue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty (30) external hexagon implants (3.75 x 10 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin following the ISO-14801. Standardized temporary crowns (n=10, N=30) were manufactured in acrylic resin and divided according to the framework type: Total plastic, Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium. The crowns were installed onto the implants (20N.cm) and fatigued (100N, 2 Hz) to determine the crowns' survival probability for missions of 300.000 and 600.000 cycles. Fatigue data were submitted to the Kaplan-Meier test followed by Wilcoxon and Log Rank, all with α = 5%. The implant platforms were parametrically inspected based on the scanning before and after the fatigue to evaluate the damage. The strain values were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey test, all with α = 5%. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that the Total plastic showed less implant damage (-0.07 ± -0.03 mm) than the Plastic with CoCr base (-0.08 ± -0.04 mm) and the Titanium (-0.10 ± -0.01 mm) frameworks. Therefore, the framework type to manufacture implant-supported temporary crowns influences the fatigue survival of the restoration and the implant platform damage. The Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium frameworks showed superior reliability than the Total plastic framework which could not survive 600,000 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The Plastic with CoCr base and the Titanium framework are suitable for restorations over 3 months in use, without a difference in the implant platform damage. Key words:Implant dentistry, axial loading, occlusion, methodo-logical study. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: This in vitro study evaluated the effect of framework type on the survival probability of temporary implant-supported crowns and on the implant platform structure after dynamic fatigue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty (30) external hexagon implants (3.75 x 10 mm) were embedded in acrylic resin following the ISO-14801. Standardized temporary crowns (n=10, N=30) were manufactured in acrylic resin and divided according to the framework type: Total plastic, Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium. The crowns were installed onto the implants (20N.cm) and fatigued (100N, 2 Hz) to determine the crowns' survival probability for missions of 300.000 and 600.000 cycles. Fatigue data were submitted to the Kaplan-Meier test followed by Wilcoxon and Log Rank, all with α = 5%. The implant platforms were parametrically inspected based on the scanning before and after the fatigue to evaluate the damage. The strain values were analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Tukey test, all with α = 5%. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that the Total plastic showed less implant damage (-0.07 ± -0.03 mm) than the Plastic with CoCr base (-0.08 ± -0.04 mm) and the Titanium (-0.10 ± -0.01 mm) frameworks. Therefore, the framework type to manufacture implant-supported temporary crowns influences the fatigue survival of the restoration and the implant platform damage. The Plastic with CoCr base and Titanium frameworks showed superior reliability than the Total plastic framework which could not survive 600,000 cycles. CONCLUSIONS: The Plastic with CoCr base and the Titanium framework are suitable for restorations over 3 months in use, without a difference in the implant platform damage. Key words:Implant dentistry, axial loading, occlusion, methodo-logical study. Copyright:
Authors: Michelle Paulino Sousa; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Sérgio de Oliveira; Paulo César da Cruz Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2019 Mar/Apr Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: Antonio Braulino de Melo Filho; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Nathália de Carvalho Ramos; Julio Nogueira Luz; Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Mauro Pedrine Santamaria; Renata Marques de Melo Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2019-04-04
Authors: João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Renata Marques de Melo; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Rodrigo Othávio de Assunção E Souza; Marco Antonio Bottino Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Date: 2018 November/Dec Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Renato Sussumu Nishioka; Marco Antonio Bottino; Vinícius Anéas Rodrigues Journal: Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent Date: 2020 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 1.840
Authors: João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Larissa Marcia Marques Alves; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Renata Marques de Melo; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges; Tarcísio José Arruda Paes-Junior; Marco Antonio Bottino Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2019-10-07
Authors: Estevam A Bonfante; Nelson R F A da Silva; Paulo G Coelho; Daniel E Bayardo-González; Van P Thompson; Gerson Bonfante Journal: Eur J Oral Sci Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.612
Authors: Regina Furbino Villefort; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luiz Borges; Nívia Castro Binda; Carlos Eduardo de Almeida Ferreira; Marco Antonio Bottino; Sandra Lúcia Ventorim von Zeidler Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 3.240