Davide Nasi1, Mauro Dobran1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Marche Polytechnic University Faculty of Medicine, Ancona, Marche, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Do alterations of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC) lead to hydrocephalus, and can this effect be mitigated by early cranioplasty (CP)? In this meta-analysis, we evaluated whether the timing of CP decreased the incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for English language articles (1990-2020). We included case series, case-control, and cohort studies, and clinical trials assessing the incidence of hydrocephalus in adult patients undergoing early CP (within 3 months) versus late CP (after 3 months) after DC. RESULTS: Eleven studies matched the inclusion criteria. The rate of postoperative hydrocephalus was not significantly different between the early (=96/1063; 9.03%) and late CP (=65/966; 6.72%) group (P = 0.09). Only in the three studies specifically reporting on the rate of hydrocephalus after DC performed to address traumatic brain injury (TBI) alone was there a significantly lower incidence of hydrocephalus with early CP (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early CP (within 90 days) after DC performed in TBI patients alone was associated with a lower incidence of hydrocephalus. However, this finding was not corroborated in the remaining eight studies involving CP for pathology exclusive of TBI. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: Do alterations of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC) lead to hydrocephalus, and can this effect be mitigated by early cranioplasty (CP)? In this meta-analysis, we evaluated whether the timing of CP decreased the incidence of postoperative hydrocephalus. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane databases using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for English language articles (1990-2020). We included case series, case-control, and cohort studies, and clinical trials assessing the incidence of hydrocephalus in adult patients undergoing early CP (within 3 months) versus late CP (after 3 months) after DC. RESULTS: Eleven studies matched the inclusion criteria. The rate of postoperative hydrocephalus was not significantly different between the early (=96/1063; 9.03%) and late CP (=65/966; 6.72%) group (P = 0.09). Only in the three studies specifically reporting on the rate of hydrocephalus after DC performed to address traumatic brain injury (TBI) alone was there a significantly lower incidence of hydrocephalus with early CP (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early CP (within 90 days) after DC performed in TBI patients alone was associated with a lower incidence of hydrocephalus. However, this finding was not corroborated in the remaining eight studies involving CP for pathology exclusive of TBI. Copyright:
Hydrocephalus is one of the main complications of decompressive craniectomy (DC).[9] In the literature, the rate of hydrocephalus after DC ranged from 11.9% to 36% in adults, with most cases requiring ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement (VPS).[8] Early cranioplasty (CP) was typically defined as those performed within ≤3 months after DC.[6] In this meta-analysis, we evaluated whether early versus late CP resulted in a lower rate of hydrocephalus following DC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Search strategy
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed utilizing the PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from 1999 to 2020. Keywords included “Cranioplasty, early” or ‘‘cranioplasty, timing.”
Study selection and outcome
In 11 studies (comparative case control or cohort), we asked whether early CP (i.e., CP ≤3 months) versus later CP differently impacted the rate of hydrocephalus following DC [Table 1].[1-5,7,9,10-12,14]
Table 1:
Characteristics of included studies reporting hydrocephalus rate related to cranioplasty timing.
Characteristics of included studies reporting hydrocephalus rate related to cranioplasty timing.
Statistical method for meta-analysis
The meta-analysis was performed using STATA/IC 13.1 statistical package (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). The log odds ratios (LORs) and 95% confidence intervals for each outcome were then reckoned as by “early” and “late” time points. LORs were pooled using the Mantel–Haenszel method with fixed effects model. The I2 metric was reported to further quantify heterogeneity (0% = no heterogeneity, 100% = maximal heterogeneity). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Inclusion of eleven studies
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this meta- analysis [Figure 1]. Ten studies were retrospective, and one study involved a prospective cohort.[1-5,7,9,10-12,14]
Figure 1:
Flowchart of search mechanism according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Flowchart of search mechanism according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.All papers were classified as level of evidence “IIIB.”
Indications for DC
Indications for initial DC included; arteriovenous malformations, ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, infection, ruptured aneurysm, trauma (i.e., traumatic brain injury [TBI] alone – 3 studies),[3,8,11] or tumors. Nine of 11 studies defined early CP as CP as those performed within equal to/ or <3 postoperative months versus late CP, occurring after 3 postoperative months. All studies reported the development of hydrocephalus as a complication following DC; in 8 of 11 studies, hydrocephalus required a VPS [Table 1].
Pooled rate of hydrocephalus
The pooled rate of hydrocephalus for these 11 studies averaged 7.93% (n = 161/2029, with a range of 0.7–28.4%). The rate of postoperative hydrocephalus was not significantly different between the early (=96/1063; 9.03%) and late CP (=65/966; 6.72%) groups [Figure 2].
Figure 2:
Meta-analysis of hydrocephalus rate in the 11 included studies.
Meta-analysis of hydrocephalus rate in the 11 included studies.However, in three studies solely involving patients undergoing DC for TBI, there was a significantly lower incidence of hydrocephalus in the early CP patients (=11/152; 7,23%) versus late CP (=36/171; 21.05%) [Figure 3].[3,8,11]
Figure 3:
Meta-analysis of hydrocephalus rate in the three studies focused on trauma patients.
Meta-analysis of hydrocephalus rate in the three studies focused on trauma patients.
DISCUSSION
We utilized this meta-analysis to determine whether early CP decreased the rate of hydrocephalus following DC. Notably, we did not find any prospective, randomized, comparative studies to clearly answer this question.
Studies favoring early CP for DC to reduce incidence of hydrocephalus
In Xu et al. study in 2015, they reviewed three studies involving 312 patients that showed early CP following DC increased the risk of hydrocephalus.[15] When Tasiou et al. reviewed 10 studies evaluating the timing of CP after DC for TBI, four of which were included in our own meta-analysis, they reported a general trend for early CP to improve cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and perfusion.[13]
Rate of hydrocephalus requiring VP shunt after DC
In 2016, Malcom et al. observed in four studies their following DC that the pooled rate of hydrocephalus requiring a VP shunt was slightly lower (5.6%) than the rate in our study (7.93%).[6]
Why would early CP decrease rates of hydrocephalus?
Early CP may restore normal intracranial CSF pressure dynamics resulting in the spontaneous resolution of hydrocephalus and other CSF disturbances. On the contrary, delayed cranial reconstruction, by prolonging this disruption, may result in permanent dysfunction of the arachnoid granulations resulting in permanent hydrocephalus (e.g., such as the one seen in hydrocephalus induced by long- term CSF drainage).[8,9]
CONCLUSION
Early CP (within or equal to 90 days) after DC performed in TBI patients was associated with a lower incidence of hydrocephalus. However, this finding was not corroborated in other studies for patients undergoing DC attributed to other etiologies.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with in ethical standards.
Authors: Ryan P Morton; Isaac Josh Abecassis; Josiah F Hanson; Jason K Barber; Mimi Chen; Cory M Kelly; John D Nerva; Samuel N Emerson; Chibawanye I Ene; Michael R Levitt; Michelle M Chowdhary; Andrew L Ko; Randall M Chesnut Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: James G Malcolm; Rima S Rindler; Jason K Chu; Jonathan A Grossberg; Gustavo Pradilla; Faiz U Ahmad Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Brian P Walcott; Churl-Su Kwon; Sameer A Sheth; Corey R Fehnel; Robert M Koffie; Wael F Asaad; Brian V Nahed; Jean-Valery Coumans Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Taco Goedemans; Dagmar Verbaan; Olivier van der Veer; Maarten Bot; René Post; Jantien Hoogmoed; Michiel B Lequin; Dennis R Buis; W Peter Vandertop; Bert A Coert; Pepijn van den Munckhof Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: H Mee; F Anwar; I Timofeev; N Owens; K Grieve; G Whiting; K Alexander; K Kendrick; A Helmy; P Hutchinson; A Kolias Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-05-17
Authors: C Iaccarino; A Kolias; P D Adelson; A M Rubiano; E Viaroli; A Buki; G Cinalli; K Fountas; T Khan; S Signoretti; V Waran; A O Adeleye; R Amorim; A Bertuccio; A Cama; R M Chesnut; P De Bonis; A Estraneo; A Figaji; S I Florian; R Formisano; P Frassanito; C Gatos; A Germanò; C Giussani; I Hossain; P Kasprzak; F La Porta; D Lindner; A I R Maas; W Paiva; P Palma; K B Park; P Peretta; A Pompucci; J Posti; S K Sengupta; A Sinha; V Sinha; R Stefini; G Talamonti; A Tasiou; G Zona; M Zucchelli; P J Hutchinson; F Servadei Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Wojciech Czyżewski; Jakub Jachimczyk; Zofia Hoffman; Michał Szymoniuk; Jakub Litak; Marcin Maciejewski; Krzysztof Kura; Radosław Rola; Kamil Torres Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 3.748